<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

  <title>The Skeptic Digest</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/list/digest/"/>
  <link rel="self"      href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive_atom/digest/"/>
  
  <updated>2012-05-17T02:43:41Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>The Skeptic Digest List Owner</name>
     
    <email>&#100;&#105;&#103;&#x65;&#115;&#116;&#64;&#115;&#107;&#101;&#112;&#116;&#105;&#99;&#46;&#111;&#x72;&#103;&#46;&#x75;&#x6B;</email>
  </author>
  <id>http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi</id>
 
  <generator>Skeptic mailing lists 5.0.0</generator>
 

  <entry>
    <title>The Skeptic Digest Volume 21, Issue 4.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20090325124553/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2009-03-25:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20090325124553%2F</id>
    
    <published>2009-03-25T12:45:53Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-25T12:45:53Z</updated>
    <content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Arial;&quot;&gt;The Skeptic Digest: Volume 21, Issue 4.&amp;#160;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:small;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Arial;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;----------------&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Features -- Little Atoms Podcast -- Events -- Dubious News -- Administrivia&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;----------------&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Features&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Columns:&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Editorial (Lindsay Kallis and Chris French)&lt;br /&gt;
        Hits &amp;#38; Misses (Mark Williams)&lt;br /&gt;
        Skeptic at Large (Wendy M. Grossman)&lt;br /&gt;
        Skeptical Stats (Mark Williams)&lt;br /&gt;
        Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)&lt;br /&gt;
        Through a Glass Darkly (Michael Heap)&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Humour:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt; Sprite by Donald Rooum, Cartoons by Tim Pearce&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Pictures:&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; Hilary Evans' Paranormal Picture Gallery&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Reviews:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Occult London; by Merlin Coverley (Tessa Kendall)&lt;br /&gt;
        2012: The year of the Mayan prophecy; by Daniel Pinchbeck (Mark Newbrook)&lt;br /&gt;
        The Paperback Apocalypse: how the Christian Church was left behind; by Robert M Price (Mike Hutton)&lt;br /&gt;
        Counter-Knowledge: How we surrendered to conspiracy theories, quack medicine, bogus science and fake history; by Damian Thompson (Mark Newbrook)&lt;br /&gt;
        Jinn from Hyperspace: And other scribblings - both serious and whimsical; by Alan Sokal (Paul Taylor)&lt;br /&gt;
        Beyond the Hoax: Science, philosophy and culture; by Alan Sokal (Paul Taylor)&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;span style=&quot;font-size:medium;&quot;&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Little Atoms Podcast&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Little Atoms, the official podcast of The Skeptic magazine, is produced and presented by Neil Denny, Padraig Reidy, Anthony Burn and (very occasionally) Richard Sanderson and broadcast every Friday from 19:00 to 19:30 GMT on Resonance 104.4 FM. It is a show about ideas and each show features a guest from the worlds of science, journalism, politics, academia, human rights or the arts in conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        Recent guests have included: Tracey Brown, Stephen Law, Andrew Copson, Nick Cohen, Steve Jones, Jonathan Heawood, Nick Davies.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        The latest guests and news can be found here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://little-atoms.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;http://little-atoms.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        while the podcast itself can be found here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds2.feedburner.com/littleatomspodcast&quot;&gt;http://feeds2.feedburner.com/littleatomspodcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:medium;&quot;&gt;Events&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        In addition to the usual line-up of events, it would be worth noting the 3rd and 4th October 2009 in your diaries. The Amazing Meeting! (TAM) is being held in the UK for the first time, in London, later this year. The website &lt;a href=&quot;http://tamlondon.org/&quot;&gt;http://tamlondon.org/&lt;/a&gt; will go fully live soon, while a Facebook page and Twitter feed (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=58881253486&quot;&gt;http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=58881253486&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/tamlondon&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/tamlondon&lt;/a&gt; respectively) are in place to report the latest news.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        A complete list of upcoming events is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/events&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/events&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        This list includes events from:&lt;br /&gt;
        Skeptics in the Pub in the UK: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Goldsmiths' Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldsmtihs.ac.uk/apru&quot;&gt;www.goldsmtihs.ac.uk/apru&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Center for Inquiry, London: &lt;a href=&quot;http://cfilondon.org&quot;&gt;http://cfilondon.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:medium;&quot;&gt;Dubious News&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Standing room only&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        When I first heard of the Atheist Bus Campaign, I was quite amused. Launched back in October, the campaign is essentially a joint venture from the British Humanist Association and Richard Dawkins, attempting to add balance to the religious propaganda which frequently appears on London public transport.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        The campaign takes the form of a large red, yellow and pink poster plastered to the side of London&amp;#8217;s buses, proudly proclaiming &amp;#8220;There&amp;#8217;s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&amp;#8221;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        Frankly, the posters are quite tricky to miss but if you don&amp;#8217;t live in the capital then you can be forgiven for not having heard of them until now. Despite having exceeded the original &amp;#163;5,500 target (which Dawkins agreed to match, pound for pound) by around &amp;#163;140,000 at the time of writing (*152,000 at the time of circulating this digest email), the original intention was to adorn only 30 buses (of the 8000 vehicles operating on London&amp;#8217;s 700 different routes each day) for one month. The campaign has however, become a lot bigger than initially expected. The British Humanist Association released a statement only a few days ago which officially launched the campaign in over 24 other locations and stated the adverts had already run on 800 buses, the London Underground and &amp;#8220;two large LCD screens on Oxford Street&amp;#8221;.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        Now I realise that criticising the first ever atheist advertising campaign is unlikely to be particularly popular, especially when said campaign involves the Patron Saint of Atheism Himself, but to be honest, I don&amp;#8217;t understand it.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        I like the concept, it&amp;#8217;s quaint and catchy; but if the slogan is truly to intended to stop people from worrying about the existence of God, in my opinion it has failed. It&amp;#8217;s a great way to catch media attention and to perhaps make atheism a point of discussion but that&amp;#8217;s all. I don&amp;#8217;t believe anyone will walk away from the poster with a new confidence in the world and I certainly don&amp;#8217;t believe it will make anyone question their faith.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        While Alpha Course and other religious posters adorn the London transport system forcefully promoting all manner of books, seminars and revivals where God may be discovered, the atheist alternative simply offers a worry-free life, safe in the knowledge that there &amp;#8220;probably is no God&amp;#8221;. I don&amp;#8217;t find that a convincing line and I&amp;#8217;m not sure anyone else should either. My views about religion are based on my experiences and upbringing, the company I keep, but importantly also the available evidence. The Bible offers no substantial evidence for belief in a divine creator especially when considered against the available criticism. I won&amp;#8217;t proclaim my approach to the topic has ever been neutral but the slogan does nothing to prompt theists to question their beliefs. If anything, the direction to &amp;#8220;stop worrying and enjoy your life&amp;#8221; is more akin to one of the Ten Commandments.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        In discussing the slogan with another atheist, I was reminded of an exchange between James Randi and Chris French in an interview earlier this year. Towards the end of the interview (which should appear in print in the next issue, and online as a video around the same time), Randi volunteered: &amp;#8220;All I want is just to get people thinking. Have them ask questions, have them think about what I have told them. Don&amp;#8217;t believe me any more than you believe these other people who make these claims. I&amp;#8217;m making a claim too; it may not be true, investigate it, think about it.&amp;#8221; French echoed the same sentiment in return, saying: &amp;#8220;The bottom line is, just think for yourselves, question everything. Question what I&amp;#8217;m telling you and look at the evidence&amp;#8221;.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Simon says&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        In the spirit of mobilising community members, the RSPCA also issued a statement in October urging the Church to consider and celebrate animals as it places new emphasis on making &amp;#8220;Time for God&amp;#8217;s Creation&amp;#8221;. Seeking to promote awareness of, and a responsible attitude towards, animal suffering, the RSPCA&amp;#8217;s press release states &amp;#8220;Many people tend to think that animal abuse happens at the hands of just a few, but in truth as a society we need to think far more deeply about how our lifestyle impacts on animals and how we may be, directly or indirectly, permitting suffering&amp;#8221;.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        The call was timed to coincide with Animal Welfare Sunday (5th October 2008), while the RSPCA also published a &amp;#8220;Service for Animal Welfare booklet, written by Professor Linzey, complete with prayers, readings and liturgies&amp;#8221;. It would seem that Prof. Linzey is no stranger to animal ethics or religion, either. As employee of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, an Anglican priest, vegetarian and first holder of an academic post in Ethics, Theology and Animal Welfare, he is well suited to his role espousing the ethical lifestyle, a topic which is gaining increasing publicity in recent times.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        Despite some questionable practices such as a controversial euthanasia policy (a topic which will be returned to at a later date), People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have for some time approached celebrities sympathetic to their cause, producing campaigns to increase awareness about ethical lifestyles. Ricky Gervais, for instance, has recently written to Gordon Brown asking if his &amp;#8220;office  be so good as to prod [the Ministry of Defence] with a stick&amp;#8221; as they are reluctant to discontinue the use of black bearskin for their Guards&amp;#8217; ceremonial caps. Simon Cowell appeared in a similar campaign stating &amp;#8220;If you wouldn&amp;#8217;t wear your dog, please don&amp;#8217;t wear any fur&amp;#8221;. Ironically, single campaigns such as these have a much greater potential for a long-term impact on the attitudes of future generations &amp;#8211; Cowell was judged as more famous than either God or the Queen, coming top in a poll of 1600 children under te
n.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Frankenstein&amp;#8217;s microchip&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        Few will forget the image of the Vacanti mouse &amp;#8211; the unfortunate rodent which, in 1997, received attention from world media due to the ear-shaped cartilage structure artificially created on its back. Since then, there have been developments towards the creation of human-animal hybrid embryos, with the Human Fertility Embryology (HFE) Bill passing its final reading in the House of Commons in October 2008, nearly two years after motions for the outlawing of such embryo research, with a majority of almost two to one.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        Although the HFE will permit the creation of three types of hybrid embryo for stem cell research it is, remarkably, not the most striking development in recent times (not to mention the Roman Catholic Church calling for women to be permitted to give birth to human-animal hybrids, according to the Times). Researchers working on a project termed NACHIP at the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry have successfully created a neuro-semiconductor interface. In essence, they managed to integrate living mammalian neurons and silicone in a new microchip. Fused to the microchip with proteins found naturally in the brain, electrical signals pass bi-directionally through the neuronal ionic channels. Once refined, the technology could enable the development of much more sophisticated drug screening methodology and, potentially, genetically powered hard discs. It&amp;#8217;s perhaps not as sensational as a woman giving birth to a dog but it&amp;#8217;s just as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;A shot in the dark&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        The opportunity to criticise anything children hold dear gives me a warm, fuzzy, glow inside, and nothing epitomises the strict morality advocated by 1950&amp;#8217;s childhood legends more than the Lone Ranger. Aside from Silver (who was quite clearly the unsung star of the show), one of the Lone Ranger&amp;#8217;s trademarks (or more aptly, gimmicks) was his fashioned silver bullet which, as you&amp;#8217;ve probably guessed, is just inaccurate.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        The idea that the Lone Ranger could perhaps cast his own bullets or at least acquire them effortlessly simply doesn&amp;#8217;t match the reality. Without a high heat resistant graphite mould from which to cast the rounds, it would be almost impossible to heat the silver to its melting point of 962 degrees Celsius to obtain a clean, shiny bullet, a fact Gun World staff discovered when they attempted this. They encountered similar problems when trying to find the correct mix of gunpowder to weight the bullet while maintaining an accurate shot.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        The resulting article entitled Lone Ranger, Go Away is a lengthy analysis of their attempts and failures to forge silver bullets with typical tools. In short, if you&amp;#8217;re an enthusiast wishing to re-enact scenes from the popular television program (or an assassin looking for a classy calling card), I&amp;#8217;d suggest giving up on forging ammunition by campfire and using electrolysis as a method to obtain a silver-plated bullet instead.&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
        ----------------&lt;br /&gt;
        Skeptical Digest is written by Mark Williams and e-mailed quarterly alongside published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To subscribe to or leave the digest, visit http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/list/digest (we do not sell, give away, or rent the e-mailing list)&lt;br /&gt;
        ----------------&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
    



    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 21.3 (Autumn 2008)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20090208173547/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2009-02-08:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20090208173547%2F</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-08T17:35:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-08T17:35:47Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CONTENTS&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dubious News - In this Issue - Little Atoms Podcast - Events - Administrivia
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reagan, Clinton, Bush, Plait
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In recent times, the qualifications required for US politicians and political candidates have notoriously come under question. Certainly, with airtime given to Barack Obama's breakfast preferences and whether those expensive Italian shoes really make John McCain any less 'American', popular political discussion seems to be increasingly vacuous.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is little doubt, however, that a certain newly elected President is actually very well suited to his new role, despite a penchant for t-shirts and baseball caps. At least one online (admittedly spoof) news portal declared the &amp;#34;Phil Plait Phenomenon&amp;#34; in full swing, and it only seems fitting to recognise the latest appointment to the ranks of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since JREF's foundation in 1994, James Randi has been at its helm in the role of President, figurehead, and general sceptical icon. The JREF press release issued on the 4th August, however, marked an end to this reign and a movement &amp;#34;up-and-sideways&amp;#34; for Randi, to the position of &amp;#34;Founder and Chairman of the Board&amp;#34;. Meanwhile, Phil Plait adopts the vacated presidential position. Plait (a familiar name to many sceptics) runs the website Bad Astronomy, founded the blog of the same title in 2005, and recently rose to interstellar notoriety with an asteroid bearing his name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Randi stated that the changes to the JREF structure would provide &amp;#34;the time and opportunity to finish my next two books: A Magician in the Laboratory, and Wrong!&amp;#34;, though in the edition of SWIFT on March 19th 2004, he wrote: &amp;#34;I lose no opportunity to get to my keyboard and record my thoughts before the inevitability of time catches up with me. I estimate that I have two more books in me. Perhaps quantity will substitute for scholarship&amp;#34;. Thankfully, with these latest offerings following a publication in 2005, that estimate is already Wrong! and I hope this paves the way for many further publications from Randi's hand.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Denver, the most inviting place on Earth
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We now know that aliens not only exist, but are also exempt from criminal prosecution in America, or at least those are the implications of an article in the Denver Post. The reported story rests on an alleged alien visitation to Denver, in which a stereotypically grey, inverted pear-shape head, appeared at the window of a man who coincidentally happened to have a video camera pointing in the same direction with the belief that local deviants had been peering into his house at his young daughters.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously it is easy to mistake a pervert for an alien, but the resulting worldwide attention given to the videotape goes to show precisely how frenzied the media can become when armed with a poorly taken video, an endorsement of authenticity, and a healthy imagination.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Validated by a film editor also from Denver, a reconstruction of the videotape was looped over and over on news channels while its owner, Stan Romanek, described his thoughts of the images. Details of the preliminary investigation and precisely how the tape was proven to be authentic are seemingly unreleased, but more interesting hoaxes have been uncovered in the past.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Cottingley Fairies, for instance, started life in 1917, long before international media. They were a private joke between relatives but photos were soon endorsed and validated by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Harold Snelling (an expert in 20th century fake photography) rendering them as a unique mystery. After debate lasting for 64 years, four of the five photos were eventually revealed as fakes through a confession from their creators. They were made using paper cut-outs and hatpins, though the authenticity of the fifth photo was always maintained.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the Denver case, however, the story becomes wonderfully farcical with Romanek's claim that he has encountered aliens on over 100 other occasions. To keep allegedly authentic video evidence of an extraterrestrial visitation hidden for years is implausible for so many reasons, but to remain silent about countless other incidents including abductions and torture, suggests a completely different motivation than the promotion of public awareness, especially when the incidents are later revealed to the media.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A news conference was organised for Romanek and the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) by Jeff Packman, a local resident. Around 30 journalists attended with at least 12 further TV cameras present. At the conference, Packman suggested that the city develop an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission that would handle alien encounters.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What seems evident from the Denver case, the Cottingley Fairies, and countless other examples, is the impressively low threshold of evidence required for a vaguely inventive hoax to gain international awareness and become part of our culture. The perpetuation of poorly supported claims in the face of common sense and fundamental questioning paves the way for future dubious thought.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One thing is certain: if aliens genuinely were peering into Denver homes, no prosecutions would be brought for breach of privacy or trespassing. Their existence would become a worldwide news story and justifiably so. Rather than media sensationalism and willing liberal acceptance as a default position, what is perhaps required is a little reflection on the nature of claims and the suspension of belief until the discovery of robust evidence.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The end of the world is pretty
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With this issue of Hits and Misses taking a decidedly extraterrestrial turn, it seems an appropriate time to mention developments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the Conseil Europ�en pour la Recherche Nucl�aire (CERN).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Crudely explained, the LHC is a ring of evacuated piping, buried 100 metres under the Franco-Swiss border and surrounded by 9300 powerful, superconducting magnets, forming the world's largest cryogenic facility. Inside the 'beam pipes', protons are accelerated to speeds approaching that of light, travelling 11,245 times around the 26.6 km ring every second before intentional collisions between the particles are created. The energy and particles created as a result of the collisions are under study in an attempt to better understand high energy events and interactions.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Presuming the current tentative schedule is met, the LHC is due to begin testing and collecting data this September. It will be six to seven years, however, before any results can be analysed. The reason for this is that the particle events under investigation will only occur in a minority of the interactions and, even then, their presence will be masked by 'noise' generated from other interactions. The events are also very short-lived, lasting only for fractions of a second. As a result, data of sufficient statistical power will take the best part of a decade to collect.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At its core, it is hoped that the data from the LHC will support the existence of the Higgs boson, the only particle identified within the most accurate theoretical physical model (Standard Model) which has not yet been observed. Consequently, without the Higgs boson, our current understanding of physics would need revising.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Throughout the development of the LHC, controversy has existed about its safety, not least due to the fact that it is the most powerful particle accelerator ever developed. While physicists would likely consider the annihilation of Earth to be resounding proof of their hypotheses, such an event, though unlikely, would inevitably cause difficulties disseminating results in a peer-reviewed format. Trips to the CERN complex can be booked at its website, through which a frightening array of quite colourful equipment can be seen, so if nothing else, the end of the world is pretty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Little Atoms
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic now has an official podcast; Little Atoms is &amp;#34;a show about ideas&amp;#34;, and its hosts, Neil Denny, Padraig Reidy, and Anthony Burn, converse weekly with a guest about &amp;#34;freedom of expression, free inquiry, empirical rationalism, skepticism, the scientific method, secular humanism and liberal democracy&amp;#34;. With past guests such as Christopher Hitchens, Jon Ronson, and James Randi, you can be guaranteed there is never a dull moment on-air! The Little Atoms podcasts can be accessed via our website and also on iTunes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic Vol 21, No 3 Autumn 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Making UFOlogy History&lt;br/&gt;
David Clarke reviews three books on classic UFO cases published 60 years after the birth of UFOlogy
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The recovered memory debate:&lt;br/&gt;
False memories of the memory literature?
James Ost analyzes and critiques a body of false memory literature
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Profits of the New Age&lt;br/&gt;
Jon Cohen reports on a sceptical day spent at The Mystic Arts Exhibition, 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Humour&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Sprite, by Donald Rooum
Cartoons by Tim Pearce
Pictures from Hilary Evans' Paranormal Picture Gallery&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skeptical Stats:&lt;br/&gt;
A column based on the observation that sometimes statistics don't lie
- they're just plain crazy...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hits and Misses:&lt;br/&gt;
Reagan, Clinton, Bush, Plait&lt;br/&gt;
Denver, the most inviting place on Earth
The end of the world is pretty&lt;br/&gt;
Little Atoms
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Lindsay Kallis and Chris French)
Skeptic at Large (Wendy M. Grossman)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
Through a Glass Darkly (Michael Heap)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Science and Religions: A Very Short Introducion by Thomas Dixon
The Satanic Scriptures by Peter H. Gilmore
In God We Doubt: Confessions of a  Failed Atheist by John Humphrys
How to Be a Good Atheist by Nick Harding
  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Events&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;A complete list of upcoming events at Skeptics in the Pub in the UK, at the Center for Inquiry, London (&lt;a href=&quot;http://cfilondon.org&quot;&gt;http://cfilondon.org&lt;/a&gt;) and at the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit at Goldsmiths (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru/lectures&quot;&gt;http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru/lectures&lt;/a&gt;) are at &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/events&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/events&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skeptical Digest is written by Mark Williams and e-mailed quarterly alongside published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To subscribe to or leave the digest, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/list/digest&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/list/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;

    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 21.2 (Summer 2008)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20080906112849/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2008-09-06:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20080906112849%2F</id>
    
    <published>2008-09-06T11:28:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-06T11:28:49Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CONTENTS&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dubious News - In this Issue - New Website - Little Atoms Podcast -
Events - Administrivia
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Retired at twelve years old
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge was first pledged by James
Randi on 6 March 1998 and during its existence to date, none of the
applicants have passed even the preliminary tests. On 6 March 2010,
however, the challenge is to be retired and the collective sigh of
relief from fraudulent performers might even faintly shift the Earth's
axis of rotation (of course that's probably unlikely given the
inherent difficulty in accurately targeting a single focal point so as
to avoid any cancellation effects from equal and opposing forces, but
you get the idea). In any case, the termination of the challenge
creates a rather notable absence in the sceptics' default defence
against claimants of all things supernatural.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although it will no longer be possible to follow Sylvia Browne's
'progress' with the challenge or to learn of further perfectly
reasonable excuses for not taking JREF money and scientific acclaim,
there are a number of organisations that still offer prize money for
successful applicants.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the UK, the Association for Skeptical Enquiry (ASKE) is currently
offering �14,000 to anyone successfully demonstrating psychic powers,
and the Indian Skeptics are offering 100,000 Rupees to be awarded by B
Premanand himself, for any psychic, supernatural or paranormal
demonstration. The list of prize funds continues too: $100,000 (AUS)
from Australian Skeptics (including $20,000 for anyone who nominates a
successful applicant), $50,000 (US) from CFI's Independent
Investigations Group and, bizarrely, $2,500 (US) from Scientific
American for a photograph of a spirit or a &amp;#34;visible psychic
manifestation&amp;#34; under test conditions.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On its website, ASKE provides a list of 20 worldwide challenges which,
at the time of publication, collectively offer over $1,500,000 in
prize money in addition to the JREF prize. Randi states that the
reasons for the discontinuation of the JREF challenge are to make
available more funding for future projects and scholarships, and as he
says in the first edition of this year's SWIFT, it will also bring an
end to &amp;#34;hundreds of poorly-constructed applications, and the endless
hours of phone, e-mail, and in-person discussions we've had to suffer
through&amp;#34;. So while one challenge that grew from a humble $100 (US)
ends, many more are ready to continue in its place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blind guesswork?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Ganzfeld procedure has its origins in 1930s Gestalt theory but has
been used consistently as an experimental method for testing telepathy
and remote viewing since the 1970s. In brief, the experiment is
typically conducted using two rooms, in one of which the individual
acting as the receiver is placed in effective perceptual isolation.
They sit comfortably in a chair under a red light, with half ping-pong
balls covering their eyes and listen to white noise (which is also
coincidentally often used during military interrogation). Meanwhile, a
set of images (or video clips) is randomly selected from a large pool
of such stimuli and a particular target stimulus is randomly selected
from that set. The 'sender' then concentrates on the chosen target in
an attempt to telepathically transmit stimulus information to the
receiver. The receiver, who typically enters a mildly altered state of
consciousness, is asked to free-associate any images or sensations
they experience during the isolation, and is asked to identify target
images when taken out of the Ganzfeld state afterwards. The technique
provides little information about the physical experiences of the
receiver when in the Ganzfeld state, but a study conducted by Harvard
researchers and published in The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 
combined technological and traditional measures to provide exactly
that. This particular study used functional magnetic resonance imaging
(fMRI) to observe the haemodynamic response and neural activity of
participants who were presented with two images (two-alternative
forced-choice tasks). Another individual, either biologically or
emotionally associated with the receiver, focused on the target image,
which was randomly selected from the two, and attempted to transmit
this to the receiver.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Whereas the original Ganzfeld tests rely substantially upon
participants' ability to match visualised images to target images,
usually in the presence of distractor images, the imaging technique
was hypothesised to highlight any telepathic effect as participants'
brain activity (as measured by blood-oxygen level changes) would be
distinctly different in response to novel images than in response to
familiar ones. Previous (non-paranormal) research into familiarity
effects had already reliably demonstrated such effects. Perhaps it is
not a great shock to learn that the results were in line with chance
expectation, but despite the counter arguments that ESP involves
fundamentally different neural activity to normal perception, or that
ESP effects are too weak to accurately measure in this manner, the
study retains its methodological merit. If significant neurological
differences are exhibited when studying 'normal' senses, perhaps a
null result when testing ESP will add further weight towards a
critical analysis of the alleged phenomenon. Or perhaps it's about
time 'real' psychics were tested. I'm sure $1,000,000 should cover the
research costs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only 64 years to live
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr Yoshiro Nakamatsu plans to die in 2072, which is no small feat,
since he will be celebrating his 80th birthday this year. Nakamatsu,
or Dr Nakamats as he is more widely known, has no apparent morbid
fascination; this date has simply been borne out of his research and
his theory of devoting equal attention to food, drink, sleep, muscle
training, spirituality, and sex. The Japanese inventor has over 3200
patents registered to his name, earning him a place in the Guinness
Book of World Records and beating Thomas Edison, who registered a mere
1093. Dr Nakamats was the mind behind the digital watch, the floppy
disk, the CD (devised because the popping noise from his vinyl copy of
Beethoven's Fifth was a distraction from inventing), the DVD and the
taxi-meter. He is also the only person to have licensed 16 patents to
IBM. Nakamats eats only one meal per day consisting of no more than
700 kilocalories, and since 1971 has photographed every meal in order
to recall those which might stimulate the best ideas. Dr Nakamats is
not exactly 'normal'.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nakamats is currently developing many projects, including: an energy
self-sufficient house, bouncing shoes to decrease physical stress
caused by walking, snack foods to improve mental performance, a
revolutionary fluid to make sex more enjoyable (and designed to
rectify Japan's falling birth rate), and paradoxically, a condom again
intended to heighten pleasure, but also to rectify the world from
AIDS. The common factor between all of these concepts, however, is
that Nakamats devised them whilst underwater.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would seem that the man who sleeps only four hours per day also
finds inspiration whilst becoming slightly hypoxic. Nakamats immerses
himself underwater in a feat of endurance in his own swimming pool
until desperate for air or until ideas are forthcoming. He then
emerges and scribbles the ideas on a Plexiglas tablet before
continuing about the day.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In order to fulfil such a varied lifestyle with so little sleep,
Nakamats naps in a device dubbed the Cerebrex, which is of course his
own invention. It is a chair which, although comfy in appearance, also
allegedly increases the blood circulation to the brain and increases
synaptic activity in the brain through pulsating sound produced from
headrest to footrest. Due to the unique technology contained within
the recliner, Nakamats claims one hour in the chair has the same
effect on the brain as eight hours of sleep.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The theory of power napping, however, is not new. Polyphasic sleep
gives a supposed method to reclaim up to six hours that would
otherwise be spent sleeping. It involves sleeping for a core period of
a few hours and then taking strictly timed naps of 20 minutes or so
throughout the day. In many cases a seemingly polyphasic schedule such
as the one undertaken by Nakamats can simply be biphasic (normal)
sleep with longer periods of sleep deprivation, but why so many
notable individuals, such as Edison, DaVinci, Churchill, Franklin, and
Napoleon, have been rumoured to keep odd sleeping patterns still
remains unanswered.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic Vol 21, No 2 Summer 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of the Dying Brain
Jason J Braithwaite offers an in-depth analysis and critique of the
survivalist's neuroscience of near-death experiences
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Searching for Cressie, the Crescent Lake Monster
Benjamin Radford recounts the story of his search for a monster that never was
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An Evening with James Randi &amp;#38; Friends
Jon Cohen reports on the evening that will be remembered for all
eternity as the greatest night there ever was (probably)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Humour&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Sprite, by Donald Rooum
Cartoons by Tim Pearce
Pictures from Hilary Evans' Paranormal Picture Gallery&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skeptical Stats:&lt;br/&gt;
A column based on the observation that sometimes statistics don't lie
- they're just plain crazy...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hits and Misses:&lt;br/&gt;
Retired at twelve years old&lt;br/&gt;
Blind guesswork?&lt;br/&gt;
Only 64 years to live
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Lindsay Kallis and Chris French)
Skeptic at Large: eHealth (Wendy M. Grossman)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
Through a Glass Darkly (Michael Heap)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Who Shot JFK? by Robin Ramsay
The Psychic Handbook by Craig &amp;#38; Jane Hamilton Parker
DVD - Nick Pope: The Man Who Left the MoD - The UFO Phenomenon
Unveiled directed by Philip Gardiner
Quirkology: The Curious Science of Everyday Lives by Richard Wiseman
&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic Website &amp;#38; Weekly Podcast
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've very secretly been working on a new website - with added podcast
- to bring a bit more content and functionality to The Skeptic and
hope you'll take some time to have a look and send us feedback on the
new site. There are a few bugs and glitches to iron out and we will be
adding more content over the next few months, but we'll attempt to
make the transition to the new site as painless as possible.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've also teamed up with the team behind Little Atoms at Resonance FM
to bring you a weekly rationalist and sceptical talkshow, with a
sprinkling of other interesting guests. We've already had over 3500
views and almost 2000 downloads since our test run last month and have
73 episodes ready to listen to, featuring; Ben Goldacre, A.C.
Grayling, Simon Singh, Julian Baggini, Johann Hari, David Colquhoun,
Francis Wheen, Christopher Hitchens, Jon Ronson, James Randi, David
Aaronovitch and many notable others.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a sneak preview, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/joomla&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/joomla&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Events&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skeptics in the Pub
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Leicester&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Real X-Files - Nick Pope&lt;br/&gt;
Tuesday, September 16
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Sceptical Look at Spiritualism - Emma-Louise Rhodes
Tuesday, October 21
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic in the Courtroom - David Allen Green
Tuesday, November 18
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Authenticity and its Influence on Behaviour, Attitudes and Beliefs - Mike Heap
Tuesday, December 16
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/leicester&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/leicester&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Email: simon at skepticsinthepub.org
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;London&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bad Science - Ben Goldacre&lt;br/&gt;
Monday 15th September 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why don't creationists just shut up? - Paul Taylor
Monday 13th October 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Beasts on the Loose - Neil Arnold&lt;br/&gt;
Monday 17th November 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptics versus Believers - Professor Chris French and Nick Pope
Monday 8th December 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Email: pub at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;APRU @ Goldsmiths, London
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is God a Dangerous Meme? - Dr Susan Blackmore
Tuesday 7th Oct 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conspiracy Beliefs: A Social Psychological Perspective - Dr Karen Douglas
Tuesday 21st Oct 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Time to Rewrite Your Autobiography? - Dr Kimberley A. Wade
Tuesday 11th Nov 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Psychoactive Plants and Psychic People: Does Psilocybin Really Cause
Psi? - Dr David Luke&lt;br/&gt;
Tuesday 18th Nov 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Magical Beliefs and the Two Cerebral Hemispheres - Dr Christine Mohr
Tuesday 9th Dec 2008
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru&quot;&gt;http://goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Email: c.french at gold.ac.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptical Digest is written by Mark Williams and e-mailed
quarterly alongside published issues of The Skeptic; there may be
occasional additional mailings. To subscribe to or leave the digest,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or
rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/joomla&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/joomla&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;

    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 21.1 (Spring 2008)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20080503152500/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2008-05-03:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20080503152500%2F</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-03T15:25:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-03T15:25:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 21.1 (Spring 2008)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this 
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Number of people who became ill, suffering from headaches, 
nausea and respiratory problems after inhaling fumes
from a 65 ft wide crater made in Peruvian soil by a meteorite: 
over 200
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Size of the family home currently being constructed for 
Arnold Chase, an American businessman, whose property is set 
to contain a 103-seat cinema: 50,853 square feet, 
approximately equivalent to 2.2 Wembley football pitches
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Number of couples who simultaneously participated in a 
ten-second kiss on September 1st 2007, in an attempt to 
establish a new Guinness World Record: 6,980
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Average length of a giraffe's tongue: 19 inches
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Fastest recorded running speed of a giraffe: 34.7 mph
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Lowest rate of success in correctly identifying the 
presence of cancer using mammograms, as found by a 
longitudinal study of 72 US health facilities: 27%
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Date upon which the BBC declared in their radio bulletin 
&amp;#34;There is no news&amp;#34;, promptly deciding to play piano music 
instead: April 18th 1930, Good Friday
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of complaints received by police during a 20-mile 
naked walk in Dorset, raising money for the Marine 
Conservation Society: 18
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Charge for attendance at a two-hour 'psychic training 
workshop' run by the Psychic Sisters Consultation Service in 
Selfridges, Oxford Street: &amp;#163;30 per person
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Maximum number of people permitted to attend each training 
session: 8
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Length of the adult education course entitled &amp;#34;An In-Depth 
Study of Psychical Research&amp;#34; run by Prof Archie Roy at Glasgow 
University, advertised with the tagline &amp;#34;Paranormal phenomena 
do occur&amp;#34;: 20 weeks
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Cost for the course, in which Roy addresses topics such as 
hauntings, apparitions, mediumship, and reincarnation: &amp;#163;120
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Number of toilets contained within the new Wembley 
Stadium: 2,618
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Combined size of the two giant screens in the new Wembley 
Stadium: equivalent to 1200 television sets
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Length of the average blink: 0.3 seconds
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Cost to provide a cow to a Malawian dairy farmer through 
Oxfam: &amp;#163;250 per month
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Total amount of water used in the production of I kg of 
beef: between 13,000 and 100,000 litres, depending on 
production techniques
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Total amount of water used in the production of lkg of 
wheat: between 1,000 and 2,000 litres, depending on production 
techniques
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Mass of grain fed to a cow in order to produce lkg of 
beef: 7kg
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Number of bottles of probiotic drinks sold annually in the 
UK: 830 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Proportion of probiotic drinks which do not contain 
sufficiently 'robust' bacteria to even survive the digestive 
process, according to the Food Standards Agency: one half
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Percentage of medical practitioners registered in the 
Chicago district who, in a survey by peers, admitted to having 
placebo treatments: 45
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Most money ever spent on the internet in one minute, the 
&amp;#34;Mega Minute&amp;#34;, as recorded by Retail Decisions, an internet 
monitoring company: &amp;#163;767,500
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Longest episode of hiccups, recorded in Charles Osborn 
from Iowa: 68 years
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Half-life of human taste buds: 10 - 14 days
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;There seems to be an ever-increasing list of things which 
have been identified as detrimental to the health of the human 
body: saturated fat, drinking alcohol, not drinking alcohol, 
not sleeping enough, sleeping too much, masturbation, Cliff 
Richard and smoking, to name but a few. Interestingly though, 
Korean nationals can add another item to that list, 
specifically the humble fan. Writing in 2004 for the popular 
conservative Korean newspaper JoongAng Ilbo, writer Grant 
Surridge noted that there were generally in Korean newspapers 
&amp;#34;each summer from 1990 to 2004, about 10 stories related to 
someone dying in the presence of an electric fan&amp;#34;. Although I 
would perhaps expect greater mortality rates among 
enthusiastic listeners of Richard's Mistletoe and Wine (I am 
assured there are such people) than among responsible users of 
electric fans, Korean society has seemingly genuinely 
assimilated the legend that, in some cases, fans can cause 
death. It is alleged that specific conditions are necessary 
for fans to cause these deaths. Doors and windows must be 
sealed creating a closed, and possibly airtight, room. The 
demise of the victim is supposedly caused either through 
hypothermic effects, asphyxiation due to the creation of an 
airless vortex (sometimes surrounding the victim's face), 
asphyxiation due to ever-depleting levels of oxygen (and/or 
increasing levels of carbon dioxide), or some bizarre 
combination of all of those. Belief in the phenomenon is not 
confined to specific circles either. Fan death has been 
'endorsed' by some high-profile and well educated figureheads, 
while reports in the news and media are certainly not a 
rarity. So, why has fan death become such an entrenched 
belief? As Seo Min, a professor at Dankook University Medical 
School, wrote in a column on the topic, &amp;#34;It's not like Korea's 
air is any less oxygen rich&amp;#34;. His personal theory is that in a 
country which already holds a belief in killer fans, making 
such conclusions is perhaps easier than examining the evidence 
for other causes of death. I also wonder though if fan death 
could be used as an explanation of certain types of suicide, 
in order to spare the emotions or social stigma for family 
members and to avoid wider disclosure of a clearly sensitive 
issue?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Astrology offers many things, but never has the course of 
true love been more directed by the stars than in the case of 
P. Selvakumar, a 33-year-old Indian farm labourer who recently 
married a dog. Of course, when I said &amp;#34;true love&amp;#34; I actually 
meant nothing of the sort. Selvakumar actually approached his 
astrologer with a tale of cruelty and karma. As a teenager he 
found two dogs mating, so in an episode he has yet to explain, 
he decided to suspend their bodies from a tree, and stone and 
beat them to death. He stated, as reported by the Telegraph, 
that promptly afterwards &amp;#34;my legs and hands got paralysed and 
I lost hearing in one ear&amp;#34;. His wise astrologer obviously 
interpreted this as Karmic consequence, advising Selvakumar 
that he would need to atone for his actions in order to avoid 
future adverse health and alleviate his disability. The issue 
here extends far beyond the role of astrology and life 
decisions, though. The penance Selvakumar was directed to 
suffer in order to atone for his sins and improve his karma, 
was that of marrying and maintaining his marriage to a further 
dog. Exactly how such an action is even remotely supposed to 
impact upon poor health is immediately questionable, but the 
penance is also fundamentally selfish, designed solely to 
negate the supposed moral consequences of Selvakumar's past 
behaviour. As any good offender rehabilitation scheme 
establishes, one important method of reducing recidivism lies 
within the acceptance that a particular act is legally or 
morally wrong. An inter-species arranged marriage simply does 
no such thing; it neither establishes responsibility nor does 
it instil any sense that stoning and beating two dogs to death 
(a method often used to kill dogs when they are to be eaten, 
due to the belief that the stress hormones released during the 
process will make the meat taste nicer) is actually wrong. 
What motivated the teenage Selvakumar to commit the actions he 
did is a question which remains open for explanation, but 
aside from the rather slim possibility of a rather substantial 
placebo effect, I sincerely doubt his new bride 'Selvi' will 
be the talisman to good health for which he had hoped. Either 
way, I pity Selvi and her future prospects.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It always happens. Your least favourite child bought you a 
pair of novelty socks for Christmas when in fact you really 
wanted a pendant, an electronic gadget or a secret elixir to 
prolong and preserve your health. Your disappointment on 
squeezing those socks through the wrapping was almost visible 
to the little one. Thankfully Q-Link, a Bristol based company, 
has the product for you. It's a pendant, an electronic gadget 
and a secret elixir to prolong and preserve your health. 
Q-Link, who obviously take great pride in their highly 
scientific approach to their products which work &amp;#34;at the 
deepest or quantum level&amp;#34;, produce a range of pendants which 
protect the wearer from terrifyingly harmful electromagnetic 
radiation. Endorsed by, among others, the Times, the Mail and 
television's London Today programme, few could fail to be 
convinced by the sculpted casing which hides a shiny, 
symmetrical circuit board. The manufacturer claims that &amp;#34;The 
Q-Link acts as a tuning fork that resonates with the ideal 
frequency at which the body's own energy system should 
vibrate.&amp;#34; To me, the method through which this is achieved 
still seems a little fuzzy, however. The Q-Link Classic, for 
instance, contains a circuit board with etched pads as 
expected, in addition to a single component: a zero-ohm 
resistor. In essence, the pendant contains some metal and a 
bit of wire, all of which doesn't actually connect to 
anything. The product requires no batteries, has a lifetime 
guarantee, and for up to &amp;#163;119.95, promises to literally do 
something. Thankfully, with an order for the Q-Link Polished 
Silver Pendant, we will never again have to be concerned about 
the horrific nature of EMF radiation (such as light?). You're 
protected. That said, the possibilities to play practical 
jokes on radiographers who fail to take one visible x-ray 
while you're wearing the pendant are limitless.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;With George Bush's final presidential term coming to an end 
on the 20th January 2009, focus is inevitably being given to 
the policies and politics of his potential successors. Yet, to 
date, no Science and Technology policy debate has ever been 
held with hopeful candidates. With that in mind, now is the 
perfect time for the emergence of Sciencedebate. Billed as a 
&amp;#34;grassroots initiative spearheaded by a growing number of 
scientists and other concerned citizens&amp;#34;, Sciencedebate 2008 
aims to bring together the presidential candidates for the 
largest debate into what the organisers believe is possibly 
&amp;#34;the most important social issue of our time&amp;#34;. Although none 
of the candidates address all of the eight primary areas of 
science and technology in their proposals, the topics of 
energy, the environment and digital technology are among the 
most contested, while Clinton is notably the only candidate to 
address the topic of space. Sciencedebate has attracted 
high-level support from Nobel Laureates, scientists, business 
leaders, university deans, writers and many other signatories, 
though no formal arrangements have been made for the debate. 
In the current climate, a mass-scale debate on science is 
essential. It would reveal which candidates are best suited to 
and most capable of addressing the urgent and contentious 
issues facing society, while raising scientific awareness 
especially within the American public. The organisers and 
signatories are requesting support from any suitable sources 
and it is possible to do exactly that by visiting 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedebate2008.com&quot;&gt;http://www.sciencedebate2008.com&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Skeptic is changing...&lt;br/&gt;
Your favourite 20-year-old British sceptical magazine is 
changing. As we approach our 21st birthday, we think the time 
is right to find out what you like and what you don't like 
about the magazine so that we can give you more of what you 
want. With that in mind, we are collecting data via an online 
survey and we would be very grateful if you would spare a few 
minutes to complete it. Just go to the website of the 
Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit &lt;br/&gt;
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru&quot;&gt;http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru&lt;/a&gt;) and click on the &amp;#34;Skeptic 
Magazine Survey&amp;#34; link. We not only want to hear from current 
subscribers but also lapsed subscribers and those who have 
never subscribed - so if you know people who fit those 
descriptions who might also be willing to help out, please 
send them the details. We are also considering adopting a new 
title. We are well aware of the negative connotations that the 
word &amp;#34;sceptic&amp;#34;. Although we feel that such attitudes are based 
upon misunderstanding a new, more universally acceptable title 
could only be a good thing. Let us have your suggestions for a 
new title. If we adopt your suggested tide, we will let you 
have a year's free subscription to the re-launched magazine! 
Feel free to let us know what you think about The Skeptic by 
email too (write to edit at skeptic.org.uk). We want your 
opinions, both positive and negative, and your ideas for 
improvements. This is your opportunity to shape the future of 
your magazine - get in touch!&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks for your support! 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (21.1, Spring 2008)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Reincarnation: Overview of the work of Ian Stevenson 
(1918-2007) (Leonard Angel)
Exposing the Myth of Alcoholics Anonymous. Part 2: Cult not 
Cure (Steven Mohr)
Amazon's Amazing Admission (Mark Newbrook)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
From Michael Heap
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Ghost Hunters: The Victorians and the Hunt for Proof of Life 
After Death by Deborah Blum
How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic by 
Madsen Pirie
Phantasmagoria: Spirit Visions, Metaphor and Media into the 
Twenty-first Century by Marina Warner
Bad Medicine: Doctors Doing Harm Since Hippocrates by David 
Wootton&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 Yahoo; 2 ABC News; 3 Telegraph; 4, 5 San Diego Zoo; 6 
Chicago Tribune; 7 BBC News Newswatch; 8 BBC News; 9 Channel 4 
News - Online; 10 AOL; 11 Scotsman.com; 12 Glasgow University; 
13, 14 WNSL; 15 Bristol Neuroscience; 16 Oxfam; 17, 18, 19 
Vegetarian Society; 20, 23 The Times; 21 The Guardian; 22 
Reuters; 24 Guinness World Records; 25 Petersen, O.H. (2006), 
Human Physiology, p. 160.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue's clippings contributors: Mark Williams, 
with suggestion for this copy from John Roberts. A special 
thank-you to Sid Rodrigues, who persistently and indefatigably 
keeps filling The Skeptic's blog (&lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/news&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/news&lt;/a&gt;) 
with news stories and pointers. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed 
as follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not 
phone)&lt;br/&gt;
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at 
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at 
skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these 
addresses. E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, 
it probably means that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman 
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside 
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional 
additional mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to 
get off the list, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do 
not sell, give away, or rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in 
return for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions 
cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For pricing and availability 
of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the 
back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment by 
credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a 
British bank (sorry, but the banking charges for foreign 
cheques and postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is 
no relation to the (more recent) American magazine or the 
(older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Tuesday of 
every month at 7:00pm at the The Penderel's Oak, 283-288 High 
Holborn, London WC1V 7HP (Nearest tube: Holborn and Chancery 
Lane). A &amp;#163;2 donation is requested to cover the guest speaker's 
travelling expenses and sundries. Non-skeptics welcome. Turn 
up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list 
of upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be 
found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5th-10th May 2008 &lt;br/&gt;
CFI London event 'The Sources of the Book'. An Anatomy of the 
Literary Beginnings of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Six 
evenings at Conway Hall, London. Registration fee &amp;#163;30. See 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centerforinquiry.net/london/events/the_sources_of_the&quot;&gt;http://www.centerforinquiry.net/london/events/the_sources_of_the&lt;/a&gt;
_book/ for details.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 6th May 2008&lt;br/&gt;
Mahlon Wagner: &amp;#34;Chiropractic - A 113 year struggle from 
pseudoscience to legitimacy&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Saturday 10th May 2008&lt;br/&gt;
Skeptics in the Pub Outing to the Mystic Arts psychic fair at 
Olympia
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 20th May 2008 &lt;br/&gt;
Richard J. Evans: &amp;#34;Holocaust denial and freedom of speech&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 17th June 2008 &lt;br/&gt;
Dr. Ciar&amp;#225;n O’Keeffe and Steve Parsons: &amp;#34;How not to investigate 
the Paranormal&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed 
and friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular 
evening for all those interested in and/or skeptical of the 
paranormal, alternative medicine, psychic powers, 
pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions, creationism, Fortean 
phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost civilizations, 
etc. Further information and mailing list announcements 
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk. Suggestions for speakers 
or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;

    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 20.4 (Winter 2007)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20080210155752/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2008-02-10:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20080210155752%2F</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-10T15:57:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-10T15:57:52Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 20.4 (Winter 2007)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this 
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Fastest zorb ride (a sport in which practitioners hurtle 
down a hill inside a giant, translucent, inflatable ball) as 
verified by police radar: 32mph over 820 metres
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Proportion of snakes to people, residing in the village of 
Choto Pashla, West Bengal, where most of the reptiles are 
poisonous monocled cobra: 1:2
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Number of people, spread over 70 different countries, said 
to be affected by high levels (above 10 parts per billion) of 
naturally occurring arsenic in drinking water: 140 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Number of children in Britain aged between 5 and 19, taking 
hyperactivity medication: 400,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Total value of two, 372-year-old, church bells, complete 
with inscription reading &amp;#34;Love God&amp;#34;, stolen from a village 
church near Andover, Hampshire: &amp;#163;30,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Value of a 40-million-year old Egyptian fossilised whale 
before it was allegedly destroyed by European diplomats who 
drove over it in two 4-wheel-drive cars: $10,000,000 (US)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Total mass of a light green, coconut-sized gemstone, 
believed to be a diamond by its owner who claimed it didn't 
scratch when tested with a garage grinder: 8,000 carats
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Total fines issued to two 19-year-old Devonian boys, who 
tested deodorant and subsequently refused to pay for it as they 
didn't like the smell: &amp;#163;163
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Fine issued by Chinese police to two lovers who hugged in 
public, on Qi Xi, the Chinese equivalent of Valentine's day: 
nearly &amp;#163;330
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Number of people who were given a free outfit by a newly 
opened London clothing store, after responding to a company 
publicity stunt by queuing in the rain wearing nothing but 
underwear: 40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Number of legal appeal proceedings recently brought to the 
Kenyan High Court, by the group 'Friends of Jesus', seeking to 
overturn Christ's conviction and subsequent execution on the 
basis of a human rights violation: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Yearly number of road accidents in Britain, attributable to 
insects: 650,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Average value of items carried in a typical school bag, by 
British children of secondary school age: &amp;#163;265
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Number of people who signed an online petition requesting 
that the government did not slaughter 'Shambo', a black 
Friesian bull living in isolation at a Hindu temple in Wales, 
who tested positive for the bacteria which causes Bovine TB: 
24,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Percentage of the British public responding in 2005, who 
supported some type of ban on experiments which cause suffering 
to animals: 80&lt;br/&gt;
16. Percentage of British animal studies conducted in 2005, in 
which an anaesthetic was used: 40&lt;br/&gt;
17. Percentage of British animal studies conducted in 2006, in 
which an anaesthetic was used: 38
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Average price of an ecstasy tablet in Portsmouth, UK: 50 
pence.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Total amount gambled on the result of the latest series of 
Big Brother: 110 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Average speed of the two Voyager space probes, launched 30 
years ago to explore Jupiter and Saturn: more than 950 miles 
per minute&lt;br/&gt;
21. Number of languages in which a greeting was recorded, for 
inclusion with each probe: 54&lt;br/&gt;
22. Amount of power the Voyager craft need to function: the 
equivalent of 3 standard light bulbs
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Equivalent power of the impact of the 320 metre wide 
asteroid dubbed 99942 Apophis, in the unlikely even that it 
collides with the Earth in 2036: 850 million tons of TNT.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Average number of handbags one woman is likely to own over 
her lifetime, according to research conducted by an Essex 
shopping centre: 111
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Average total cost of these handbags: &amp;#163;8,436
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Barry L. Beyerstein, 19th May 1947 - 25th June 2007
Barry Lane Beyerstein was a sceptic. He held a Professorship in 
Psychology at Simon Fraser University, the chair position in 
the British Columbia Skeptics Society, and he was a co-founder 
of CSICOP. In addition to this, he was a husband and father. 
Whilst many tributes and accounts of Barry's life have focused 
on his achievements and extensive voluntary contributions to 
science and scepticism, the account on page 19 of the magazine 
gives the heartfelt sentiments of Barry's daughter, Lindsay. 
Her words immortalise Barry's personality far more 
appropriately than mine ever could.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It's life, Jim... but not as we know it. The famous Star 
Trek quotation may perhaps be a tired line, but this time it 
might have an element of truth. In August 2007, the New Journal 
of Physics published a paper by researchers working for the 
Russian Academy of Science, the Max-Planck Institute, and the 
University of Sydney explaining that, under a specific set of 
conditions in space, inorganic material may adopt the 
characteristics of living organisms. The group's findings add 
significantly to the debate surrounding the existence of 
inorganic and alien life, although they are, for now, purely 
theoretical. The group took inorganic dust particles and used 
computer simulations to model their behaviour when immersed and 
held in a plasma (the fourth state of matter consisting of 
charged particles created when electrons are dissociated from 
the atomic nuclei of a superheated gas). The model demonstrated 
that the particles would absorb electrons from the plasma thus 
attracting positive ions, and that under zero gravity 
conditions the dust particles would sometimes form helical 
structures comparable to that of DNA. This dust-formed double 
helix has the potential to store and retain varying amounts of 
information through its two electrostatically stable states, 
while sections of the structure can be copied from one helix to 
another (bifurcation) and the chain can even in a sense 
metabolise, using new plasma to persist and grow. In these 
respects, the structures possess some of the characteristics 
attributed to 'life', but that doesn't mean that if they were 
to exist in reality they would be 'living'. More correctly, 
these findings further blur the boundaries of 'life.' 
Previously, most scientists held that life could only occur in 
the presence of liquids such as water, but as Seth Shostak, a 
senior astronomer at the California-based SETI Institute said, 
&amp;#34;If you could have life in the hot gases of a star, or in the 
hot, interstellar gas that suffuses the space between the 
stars, well, not only would that be 'life as we don't know it' 
but it might be the most common type of life.&amp;#34; Shostak also 
noted that our existing ideas about what defines 'life' are 
already inadequate. The relevant principles the research paper 
considers are &amp;#34;autonomy, evolution, progeny and autopoiests&amp;#34;. 
But under these strict categories, as Shostak pointed out, 
mules (the sterile offspring of a male donkey and a female 
horse) could not be considered as living. That leaves us facing 
the potential absurdity that inorganic dust structures fulfill 
the academic criteria for life, but hybrid mammals do not. 
Perhaps it's science itself that now needs to evolve.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;According to various newspapers, including The Times and the 
Daily Mail, in late 2007, beachcombers in Southwest England may 
find themselves inundated with colourful plastic bath toys that 
will have floated over 17,000 miles of sea to reach the shore. 
The story began on 10 January 1992, when a Pacific storm washed 
three 40-foot containers from a ship bound for America from 
Hong Kong. Inside the containers were packages containing 
28,800 yellow ducks, green frogs, blue turtles, and red 
beavers, rubber bath toys produced by a Chinese manufacturer 
for the US company The First Years and packaged in fours. Their 
journey has taken them halfway around the world through 
Alaskan, Japanese, Hawaiian, Arctic, Atlantic, Canadian, 
Scottish and Cornish waters. The toys' progress has been 
meticulously charted by Seattle-based oceanographer Curtis 
Ebbesmeyer; supposedly they have traversed the North Pacific 
from Alaska to Japan and back to North America in around 3 
years. Their progress was twice as fast as the surface water 
during this trip, earning them the title 'hyper-ducks', but the 
toys averaged one mile per day even when challenged by Arctic 
ice. Two thirds of the friendly flotilla have already made 
their way successfully to foreign beaches, but the remaining 
internationally noted yellow icons are expected to be carried 
by the Gulf Stream to Cornish beaches in late 2007. Although 
their journey might seem trivial, the toys' adventure may 
contribute largely to oceanographic studies of water currents. 
This is not the first instance in which an accidental spill has 
aided study, either - in 1990, 61,000 Nike running shoes were 
lost overboard from another ship before being discovered on 
further beaches worldwide. Assuming scientists' models of 
surface currents are correct, UK residents may well find up to 
10,000 brightly coloured bath toys in the near future. Each is 
now worth a &amp;#163;50 bounty from the manufacturer as its 
contribution to science.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Spot the odd one out: acupuncture, saffron (the Middle 
Eastern spice), exercise, St. John's Wort, ketamine, 
electro-convulsive therapy and omega-3 fatty acids. Stop 
reading at the end of this sentence and really consider for a 
moment - which of the list has not been employed by health 
'practitioners' to treat depression? The answer: all of them 
deserve to be listed, none are odd. While many treatments for 
depression historically vary on the (non-standardised) scale of 
barbaric to pseudoscientific, it seems one of the more unlikely 
weapons to be considered in the recent treatment arsenals is 
that of ketamine. The journal Biological Psychiatry published 
findings from a preliminary study conducted by the National 
Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), suggesting that the drug 
acts remarkably quickly as an antidepressant, relieving some 
patients' symptoms within two hours. The significance of these 
results is obvious given that the most common medications 
currently used to treat depression typically need four to six 
weeks to take effect. In fact, the small-scale research 
returned results showing that 71% of participants experienced a 
halving in their measured depression after one day. In studies 
with established medication, it took eight weeks for 63% of 
participants to experience the same effects. Unfortunately 
every silver lining has a cloud. Aside from apparently being a 
powerful, if short-lasting anti-depressant, ketamine is also a 
psychedelic and a dissociative anaesthetic often used in 
veterinary medicine. The drug is popularly abused in clubbing, 
producing hallucinogenic effects and out of body experiences at 
higher concentrations. Although only small (subanaesthetic) 
concentrations of ketamine were administered to research 
participants, the possibility of hallucinations remained. If 
participants did experience this, ketamine would be easily 
separated from the inert placebo, reducing the validity of 
results and making participants more likely to provide false 
positive reports of its efficacy. Either way, it would seem 
best to find a new but similarly acting medication. Ketamine 
was classified as a Class 'C' drug, effective in the UK from 
January 2006. Possession of the substance can now yield a two 
year jail term, while individuals caught supplying the drug can 
earn 14 years behind bars - certainly long enough to cause 
depression in itself.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (20.4, Winter 2007)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Exposing the Myth of Alcoholics Anonymous. Part 1: History and 
(Lack of ) Effectiveness (Steven Mohr)
Believe it or Not (Sally Marlow interviews Mark Vernon)
Inside a Camphill Community (Matthew Provonsha)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis by Bryan Farha
How to Start Your Own Secret Society by Nick Harding
The History of Witchcraft by Lois Martin
Freemasonry by Giles Morgan&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1,3 ABC News (Australia); 2 AFP; 4,5 BBC News; 6 AHN Media - 
FeedSyndicate; 7,9,11 Reuters; 8,10 Metro; 12,13 Esure; 14 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wevaluelife.org&quot;&gt;http://www.wevaluelife.org&lt;/a&gt;; 15 Ipsos MORI; 16,17, Home Office 
Research Statistics; 18 Drugscope; 19,24,25 This is London; 20 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceflightnow.com&quot;&gt;http://www.spaceflightnow.com&lt;/a&gt;; 21,22 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astronomy.com&quot;&gt;http://www.astronomy.com&lt;/a&gt;; 
&lt;strong&gt;23 NASA&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue's clippings contributors: Mark Williams, 
Sid Rodrigues, the Wizard's Star List, Skeptic News. A special 
thank-you to Sid Rodrigues, who persistently and indefatigably 
keeps filling The Skeptic's blog &lt;br/&gt;
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&lt;/a&gt;) with news stories and 
pointers. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed 
as follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not 
phone)&lt;br/&gt;
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at 
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these 
addresses. E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, 
it probably means that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman 
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside 
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional 
additional mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get 
off the list, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, 
give away, or rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in return 
for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost 
UKP15/year for UK residents. For pricing and availability of 
back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back 
page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment by 
credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British 
bank (sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and 
postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation 
to the (more recent) American magazine or the (older) 
Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Tuesday of 
every month at 7:00pm at the The Penderel's Oak, 283-288 High 
Holborn, London WC1V 7HP (Nearest tube: Holborn and Chancery 
Lane). A &amp;#163;2 donation is requested to cover the guest speaker's 
travelling expenses and sundries. Non-skeptics welcome. Turn up 
at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of 
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be 
found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 19th February 2008&lt;br/&gt;
Paul Taylor &amp;#34;Why don't creationists just shut up?&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed 
and friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular 
evening for all those interested in and/or skeptical of the 
paranormal, alternative medicine, psychic powers, 
pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions, creationism, Fortean 
phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost civilizations, 
etc. Further information and mailing list announcements 
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk. Suggestions for speakers 
or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 20.3 (Autumn 2007)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20071209120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2007-12-09:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20071209120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2007-12-09T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-09T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 20.3 (Autumn 2007)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Total increase, per minute, of personal debt in Britain: 115 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Increase in sale of &amp;#34;No. 7 Preserve and Protect&amp;#34; serum in the 24
hours after a Horizon episode reported that research from Manchester
University supported its claims to reduce wrinkles in aging skin: 2,000
percent
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Days a cat survived without food or water, trapped in a crate of
motorcycle helmets travelling by sea from China to America: 35
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Percentage of websites a May, 2007, Google study showed can infect
visitors' computers with malicious software: .01
5. Proportion of malicious websites press reports said that the Google
study found: 1 in 10
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Number of children, many with no criminal record, whose DNA has been
stored without permission on the police DNA database: 521,901
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Highest bid for 'Jon Malipieman', an imaginary friend for sale on
eBay, before the service deleted the listing: $3,062
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of years of no-claims bonus recently lost by Britain's oldest
driver, 105-year-old Sheila Thompsons: 71
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Number of counts the Advertising Standards Authority upheld against
the Reverend Peter Popoff over ads for &amp;#34;Miracle Spring Water&amp;#34; and
&amp;#34;Miracle Olive Oil&amp;#34; on the shopping channel Soap on Deal TV: 11
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Percentage by which teens in a New York state study who watched
more than three hours of TV per day were less likely to graduate high
school: 82
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Number of previous driving licence suspensions or revocations
Michael Wiley, a one-legged, armless man, had prior to evading Florida
police in a 100 mph car chase in the spring of 2007: 18
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Height of the location of the world's highest swing, a viewing
platform on a 1,100 foot TV broadcast tower in China: 700 feet
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Cost of a nine-inch origami Hanji-paper bull moose from the website
of expert folder Robert J. Lang: $800
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Number of children of donors to the Nobel prize winners' sperm bank
profiled in the 2005 book Who's Your Daddy?: 30
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Number of copies sold as of February 2007 of the Left Behind book
series, which imagines a contemporary Rapture: more than 43 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Number of litres of water Americans use per day: 400 to 600
17. Number of litres of water most Europeans use per day, compared to
Americans: less than half&lt;br/&gt;
18. Proportion of the world's people who do not have the level of clean
water and sanitation services available 2,000 years ago in ancient
Rome: nearly half
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Amount by which world primary energy consumption increased in 2005:
2.7 percent
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Amount for which entrepreneur Gary Kremen sold the domain name
&amp;#34;sex.com&amp;#34; in 2006, after a 10-year legal battle to win it back after it
was stolen from him: $12 million&lt;br/&gt;
21. Amount the court ordered the conman who stole sex.com, Stephen
Michael Cohen, to pay Kremen: $65 million
22. Amount Cohen has actually paid: approximately $3 million in seized
real estate
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Proportion of drugs sold in developing countries that is fake: 25%
to 50%
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Potency of the frequently abused prescription drug Fentanyl
compared to heroin: 80:1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Number of countries in which governments block access to Internet
sites for political, social, or security reasons: at least 25
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Uri Geller recently offered to save Carlisle from an ancient curse
which causes floods, pestilence, and sporting humiliation (according to
Reuters, he offered to repurpose the city's &amp;#34;cursing stone&amp;#34; as a garden
ornament), but it seems he still had time for legal action against a
sceptical video posted to YouTube. Recently acquired by the Web search
engine company Google, YouTube is a site where anyone may post video
clips of up to ten minutes long, and millions do, anything from
highlights of 1970s tennis matches to self-filmed personal thoughts on
life. As you might expect, much of the material uploaded to the site is
copyright to someone other than the uploader, and since the Google
acquisition the pace of legal complaints has stepped up. Most of these
complaints come from large media companies like Viacom, which not long
ago followed up a failed licensing deal with a demand that all its
copyrighted material be removed from the site. However, according to
The Times, the latest workout of Geller's toned legal biceps focuses on
a short video featuring James Randi bending metal using sleight of hand
techniques. Geller is claiming he owns the copyright in ten seconds of
this video excerpt, taken from the 1993 TV programme Secrets of the
Psychics. Geller may have bitten off more than he realised. Suing
individual sceptics is one thing, but in straying into the field of
copyright claims he's taking on much bigger opponents. The Electronic
Frontier Foundation (EFF), a lobbying group focused on defending civil
liberties online and a staunch opponent of over-reaching copyright
claims, retaliated by filing suit against Geller for using &amp;#34;baseless
copyright claims&amp;#34; to stifle free speech. The crux of the issue is the
'fair use' (in the UK known as 'fair dealing') clause in US copyright
law which permits some limited use of copyright material for education,
criticism, or parody without the permission of the rights-holders. In
short, while it is questionable whether ten seconds of video footage
falls within fair use, silencing sceptical review on this basis may
similarly infringe the US First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
YouTube removed the video rather than risk prosecution under the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1998). However, the EFF has posted
all the relevant documents in the case, on its website
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org&quot;&gt;http://www.eff.org&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It sounded like a glorified tour of Edinburgh's most 'paranormally
active' (and media-friendly) areas, but the third annual Mary King's
Ghost Fest (held 11-20 May, 2007) featured the world's first infrasound
experiments in an allegedly haunted location. The research, led by
Ciaran O'Keeffe of Most Haunted fame, complemented what the Ghost Fest
website described as the &amp;#34;hugely popular overnight vigils in the
shadowy Blair Street Vaults&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;Electronic Voice Phenomenon (EVP)
Workshops&amp;#34;. Aside from the curiosity with which one might approach an
EVP workshop — perhaps they teach you how to create the phenomenon
after you die? — this experiment appears to be the most interesting
event. O'Keeffe and Steve Parsons, an investigator from the research
group Para.Science, were to play Pied Pipers, guiding the public
through the notorious underground network beneath Edinburgh's Royal
Mile. Along the way, Parsons would expose some of the visiting groups
to an infrasound stimulus created by his custom-built generator.
Because the generator operates at frequencies below 20Hz, the sound
should be below the range the human ear can perceive. The idea is to
establish whether, as O'Keeffe and Parsons' press release put it,
&amp;#34;infrasound could be the cause of feelings associated with paranormal
experiences or if such feelings truly are an inexplicable phenomena.&amp;#34;
The release also claimed that this research is the first of its kind to
examine this question. The basis comes from the late Engineering and
Design graduate and 'ghost hunter' Vic Tandy, who in &amp;#34;Ghost in the
Machine&amp;#34;, a 1998 paper published in the Journal of the Society for
Psychical Research, hypothesised that infra-sound of the order of 19Hz
might be responsible for many ghost sightings, as it closely matches
the natural resonant frequency of the human eye. Infrasound emitters
such as traffic, trains, thunder, and wind are now common in everyday
life, and infrasonic waves can carry over long distances with less
susceptibility to interference or disturbance than higher frequencies.
Testing Tandy's theory could, therefore, yield important and
interesting results. We'll keep you posted.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Geeks everywhere were groaning at the BBC's Panorama programme in
May, when it ran &amp;#34;Wi-fi: a warning signal&amp;#34;. In that story, Panorama
claimed that wi-fi – also known as wireless networking – was
potentially more dangerous than mobile phone masts. And it's in our
schools! And children have skulls that are immature and unformed! A
decade after people started worrying about mobile phone masts – during
which time all those same worried people bought themselves and their
children mobile phones – it's clearly time for the next Great
Technology Scare. The programme obliged with all the necessary
elements: a few scientists to say &amp;#34;We just don't know – so we're
worried&amp;#34;; an MP to accuse the government of complicity with industry in
ignoring the issue; a guy with a measuring device; and a miserable
victim (because apparently no one has told the producers of Panorama
that the plural of anecdote is not data). The victim in the case was a
woman who claims to be so sensitive to electromagnetic radiation that
she must shield her house with metal foil (helpfully supplied by one of
the programme's worry-mongers). We would point out that at heart what
wi-fi and mobile phones are is radios. The radiation they broadcast is
radio waves. Yes, the right frequencies and intensities of radiation
can be dangerous. But we've had radiation in the form of broadcast
media for some decades now. It only matters that wi-fi gives off three
times as much radiation as mobile phones (but much further from the
head) if that radiation is dangerous in the first place. Should we do
research into the long-term effects of the various types of radiation
we're surrounding ourselves with? Certainly. Should we panic on the
basis of a few vaguely ill people and rip out a technology being
embraced by millions because it's useful and functional? No. If we are
so concerned about children, shouldn't we be banning automobiles (which
kill 170 and seriously injure 4,000 every year), pollution (the WHO
found in 2004 that exposure to pollution or unsafe living conditions
kills 100,000 European children every year), or poverty (another 1,000
a year in Britain alone)? The BBC's own technology writers were
disgusted enough to publish their own critique of the programme on the
BBC website. We can only be grateful no one told the Panorama team that
wi-fi broadcasts in the same frequency band as microwave ovens.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;If there's one thing that's more galling than another, it's seeing
the limited public resources for health care spent on things like
homoeopathy rather than treatments with a sound basis of evidence. The
good news is that homoeopathy on the NHS is under increasing pressure.
According to The Times, more than half of English Primary Care Trusts
are now refusing to pay for homoeopathy or severely restricting access
to it, in part due to last year's letter from 13 scientists that
opposed NHS support of unproven or disproved treatments. Two
homoeopathic hospitals – Tunbridge Wells and the Royal London – are
being threatened with closure. An NHS report published at the end of
May concluded that what evidence there is to support homoeopathy is
&amp;#34;very weak&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;the evidence of cost-effectiveness is lacking&amp;#34;.
(Clearly the evidence needs further dilution.) The report suggested
that PCTs should reduce their coverage or eliminate it entirely. The
biggest difficulty now may be convincing the public that this is a
question of ensuring that funding goes to treatments that work, not of
suppressing &amp;#34;consumer choice&amp;#34; or serving the interests of Big Pharma.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (20.3, Autumn 2007)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Psychics on eBay (Emma-Louise Rhodes)
Haunting the Bereaved (Mark Williams)
R. E. Ality Check: An Alternative Approach to Religious Education
(Damien Morris)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way we Think edited by
Alan Grafen and Mark Ridley
The Occult Tradition: From the Renaissance to the Present Day by David
S. Katz
Fakers, Forger &amp;#38; Phoneys: Famous Scams and Scamps by Magnus Magnusson
Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast: The Evolutionary Origins of
Beliefs by Lewis Wolpert&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 Credit Action; 2 Observer Woman; 3 Ananova.com; 4 Information Week; 5
Google; 6 The Register, 7 Metro, wwwfastlanetransport.ca; 8
Ananova.com; Advertising Standards Authority; 10 New Scientist; 11 New
York Post; 12 Gading.com; 13 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.langorigami.com/&quot;&gt;www.langorigami.com&lt;/a&gt;; 14 Business Week; 15,
16, 17, 18 The New Yorker; 19 BP Statistical Review 2006; 20, 21 The
Guardian; 21, 22, 23 Sex.com, by Meren McCarthy; 24, 25 The Guardian
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue’s clippings contributors: Mark Williams, Sid
Rodrigues, the Wizard's Star List, Skeptic News. A special thank-you to
Sid Rodrigues, who persistently and indefatigably keeps filling The
Skeptic's blog (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&lt;/a&gt;) with news stories and
pointers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside published
issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To
sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list, visit
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Tuesday of every month
at 7:00pm at the The Penderel's Oak, 283-288 High Holborn, London WC1V
7HP (Nearest tube: Holborn and Chancery Lane). A &amp;#163;2 donation is
requested to cover the guest speaker's travelling expenses and
sundries. Non-skeptics welcome. Turn up at any time during the night.
Detailed directions, a list of upcoming speakers and a map of how to
get to the pub can be found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 11th December 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Dr. Mark Vernon &amp;#34;How to be an Agnostic and Why it Matters&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 15th January 2008&lt;br/&gt;
Nick Pope &amp;#34;The British X-Files&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tuesday 19th February 2008&lt;br/&gt;
Paul Taylor &amp;#34;Why don’t creationists just shut up?&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk. Suggestions for speakers or
offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 20.2 (Summer 2007)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20070624120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2007-06-24:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20070624120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2007-06-24T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-06-24T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 20.2 (Summer 2007)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Percentage of Kellogg's Frosties sold that are eaten by men over 18:
65
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Percentage of the UK working age population that is disabled: 20
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Number of her children that Ada Mason, who died Britain's oldest
woman at 111 in February 2007, outlived: 5 out of 5
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Average number of deaths in Britain annually that are attributable
to vending machines: 12
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Profits made, per second, by Tesco supermarkets: &amp;#163;77
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. In January 2007, number of Papua New Guinea women tortured into
confessing they were witches and then murdered: 4
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Number of spybots embedded in the official Web site for the 2007
Superbowl: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of different types of tools made by chimpanzees observed in
Senegal: 26
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. According to a recent study from the Wrexham Maelor Hospital, number
of women in Britain ever sexually assaulted after their drinks were
spiked with Rohypnol or GHB: none
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Annual income received by the Howard de Walden Estate from its 92
acres of real estate in Marylebone, including Harley Street, from which
the Estate has banned abortions and cosmetic surgery: &amp;#163;47 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Percentage differential between men's and women's prize money on
the pro tennis tours despite Wimbledon's move to parity: 22
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Number of people registered for surveillance in the first few years
of the US National Security Entry-Exit Registration System created
after the 2001 attacks: 80,000&lt;br/&gt;
13. Number of those investigated under NSEERS who were detained and/or
sent for deportation hearings: more than 13,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Date when MIT Media Lab head Nicholas Negroponte predicted the
Internet would have one billion users: by the end of the 20th century
15. Date when the Internet actually had a billion users: late 2005
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Number of tapes of angels singing placed online by Florida retired
Air Force officer Jim Bramlett: 4
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Number of UFO sightings added to an online database run by police
officers over the last five years: more than 200
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Amount of the Challenge prize offered by Sir Richard Branson to
anyone who can come up with a way of removing one billion tonnes of
carbon per year from the atmosphere: $25 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Cost of equipment including an infrared laser thermometer used by
Alabama's South-Eastern Paranormal Society to detect cold spots left by
ghosts: $2,100
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Number of children in China Orphaned by AIDS: 75,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Number of former US vice-presidents who have won an Oscar: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Year in which swallowing live goldfish was a fad: 193923. The
record number of goldfish swallowed: 300
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Cost of the LawnBott Evolution, which can mow tip to 33,000 square
feet of lawn on a single battery charge: $2,500
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Annual cost, per capita, of the Queen (or a minute's attendance at
theWorld Cup England versus Portugal game), in 2006: 62p
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Computer security professor Matt Blaze, a mathematician and
cryptography expert at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed James
Randi's million-dollar prize in January. In a posting on his blog (at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crypto.com/&quot;&gt;www.crypto.com&lt;/a&gt;), Blaze explained the means by which he and his
colleague Jutta Degener successfully visualized the contents of a box
Randi had created as part of a remote viewing experiment. In creating
such a challenge, Randi's foundation, Blaze explained, faces the
problem of both hiding the contents of the box and assuring psychics
and would-be challengers that the test is fair. Randi solved this
problem by publishing an encoded description of the box's contents on
the Foundation Web site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randi.org/&quot;&gt;www.randi.org&lt;/a&gt;). It is:
0679&lt;br/&gt;
4388&lt;br/&gt;
66/27&lt;br/&gt;
5-14&lt;br/&gt;
After examining this code for a while, Blaze and Degener thought the
first ten digits could be the ISBN of a published book. Looking it up,
they discovered those digits are the ISBN of the 1995 edition of the
Random House Webster's College Dictionary. In the library copy they
eventually found, the 14th entry from the bottom on page 275 is the
definition for compact disc. Blaze and Degener therefore concluded
that's what the box contained, correctly. Blaze noted a couple of
further points. Quite apart from the fact that they were able to crack
the published code, because the rules for creating the code were not
specified it would still be possible for Randi to cheat by claiming the
code had a different meaning than the one the psychic divined. Second,
that cryptographically encoding the string wouldn't help, in part
because the workings of cryptography are too complicated for most
people to understand. In the meantime, Blaze decided to forego
collecting the million dollars. For sceptics, though, the story is abit
alarming. If it's this difficult for Randi, with all his years of
experience, to devise a test that can't be cracked and blocks cheating
on both sides, what hope is there for the rest of us?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In late February the journal Current Biology ran a paper by Jill D.
Pruetz and Paco Bertolani from the Department of Anthropology at Iowa
State University reporting that chimpanzees have been observed using
tools to hunt other animals in Senegal. The chimps were seen
identifying appropriate tree branches, breaking them off, removing the
bark, and sharpening the tips with their teeth. The paper includes a
picture of one of these spear-like tools; it measures about 28 inches
long. Overall, chimps have been spotted using tools in over 25
different contexts: opening hard nuts, trying to extract bush babies
from cavities in branches or tree trunks (one of the uses for those
spears). Curiously, although hunting is a predominantly male activity
among chimpanzees, tools are more commonly used by females and immature
males. (Maybe not using them is the chimp version of being macho.) So
far, no one has reported finding a large, black monolith nearby playing
Thus Spake Zarathustra.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The indefatigable Sid Rodrigues (thanks, Sid!) who maintains The
Skeptic's news blog (ukskeptic.livejournal.com) recently included a
pointer to a story from Continuity Central questioning the oft-repeated
statistic that &amp;#34;80 percent of businesses affected by a major incident
close within 18 months&amp;#34;. Where, the writer, Mel Gosling, asked, does
this statistic come from? Everyone quotes it as true, but no one cites
a source. Vendors do, however, find it useful for frightening
businesses into developing continuity plans (always a good idea in any
case). We have quoted it ourselves. We have also tried ourselves to
find a source - and failed. Gosling cited three examples suggesting
it's not true. One: foot and mouth disease. No contingency plans among
farmers and small rural businesses; after 18 months less than 10
percent folded. Two: Carlisle floods in 2005. Only 90 percent
contingency plans; less than 20 percent closed. Three: the 1998 Omagh
bombing. Probably no contingency plans; majority of businesses still
trading in 2006. We would be interested in hearing from anyone who can
cite a verifiable source for this statistic.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Advertising Standards Authority ruled in February that Channel 4
personality Gillian McKeith may not continue to call herself &amp;#34;Dr&amp;#34; after
a complaint was submitted by a regular reader of Ben Goldacre's
BadScience.net. Goldacre, who saw a draft of the adjudication - it went
unpublished when McKeith agreed to stop using the title in her
advertising - notes that McKeith's claimed qualification came from an
unaccredited American correspondence course. McKeith was also recently
censured by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency for
selling herbal pills she claimed promoted sexual satisfaction.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;There's an American saying that goes like this: if it doesn't move
and it should, spray it with WD-40; if it moves and it shouldn't, use
duct tape. Duct tape (also known, in the film industry, as &amp;#34;gaffer's
tape&amp;#34;) is the cure-all for everything from rattling cars to terrorist
activity. We had not, however, heard that in 2002 a small study
suggested that duct tape was also the way to get rid of warts.
Apparently, you're supposed to apply it to the affected area and leave
it on for a week, then soak the area and rub it with pumice stone. Now
it turns out that duct tape isn't as effective at this as they thought
it was. The New York Times recently reported that a newer study that
examined the data from 60 studies looking at different removal methods
concluded that the most effective method is applying salicylic acid,
which works about 73 percent of the time. The duct tape treatment only
works 16 percent of the time, according to the latest tests. It's
probably better this way. Now you can save your duct tape for the
really important things - like eliminating rattles and squeaks that
otherwise might make you think you were being haunted.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (20.2, Summer 2007)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;The Evolution Controversy (Nell Barrie)
An Open Letter to the Public about Young Earth Creationism (Julian W.
Kirchherr)
Do 17 percent of people in Britain really believe in &amp;#34;intelligent
design&amp;#34;? (Adam Buick)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism by Paul
Boghossian
Newton: a Very Short Introduction by Rob Lliffe
Contact With Alien Civilizations: Our Hopes and Fears About
Encountering Extraterrestrials by Michael A G Michaud
Science, Religion and the Meaning of Life by Mark Vernon
Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife by Mary Roach
A Teaspoon and an Open Mind by Michael White&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 Kellogg (quoted in The Guardian); 2 Disability Rights Commission 2006
briefing; 3 Guardian; 4 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cherwell.org/&quot;&gt;www.cherwell.org&lt;/a&gt;; 5 Evening Standard; 6 CNN; 7
The Register; 8 Current Biology; 9 Evening Standard; 10 BBC; 11 Daily
Tennis; 12,13 Illusions of Security, by Maureen Webb; 14 personal
interview; 15 Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox; 16 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.choicesforliving.com/&quot;&gt;www.choicesforliving.com&lt;/a&gt;; 17
News Shopper; 18 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virginearth.com/&quot;&gt;www.virginearth.com&lt;/a&gt;; 19 Times Daily; 20 The Blood of
Yingzhou District; 21 Academy Awards ceremony 2007; 22, 23 The Worst
Case Scenario Almanac - History; 24 Business Week; 25 the Queen's
accountants (via the Guardian)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue’s clippings contributors: Judith Wood, Steuart
Campbell, Tom Ruffles, Ernest Jackson, the Wizard’s Star List, Skeptic
News, Phil McKerracher. A special thank-you to Sid Rodrigues, who
persistently and indefatigably keeps filling The Skeptic's blog
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&lt;/a&gt;) with news stories and pointers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside published
issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To
sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list, visit
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 19th July 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Timothy Good &amp;#34;Need to Know: UFOs, the Military and Intelligence&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 30th August 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Victor Stenger &amp;#34;God: The Failed Hypothesis&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk. Suggestions for speakers or
offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 20.1 (Spring 2007)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20070526120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2007-05-26:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20070526120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2007-05-26T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-26T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 20.1 (Spring 2007)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Cost of a James Randi doll on which to perform voodoo experiments:
$24&lt;br/&gt;
2. Number of pins included with the 12-inch doll: 3
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Size of the McDonald's logo built out of tiles in the Nevada desert
and visible from space: 8,120 square metres
4. Proportion of British children bullied at school: 7 out of 10
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Cost of a 2007 &amp;#34;Skepchick&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;Skepdude&amp;#34; calendar: $20 (or both for
$35)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Percentage of &amp;#34;high-risk&amp;#34; sexual offenders who do not reoffend: 90
7. Percentage of other types of offenders who are convicted of another
crime within two years: 57
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Age of Salem's official witch: 73
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Number of blessings of lesbian marriages retired Archbishop Terence
Finlay performed before losing his licence to officiate at weddings: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Cost of an Oakwood, Lanarkshire, home designed according to the
principles of Feng Shui: &amp;#163;1.1 million
11. Number of drugs recommended by health food shops for depression
that has scientific backing: 1 out of 13
12. Price of a four-day Tarot beginners' course in Richmond, Surrey:
&amp;#163;360&lt;br/&gt;
13. Number, on October 9, 2006, of UK Web pages using the word
&amp;#34;spooktacular&amp;#34;: about 12,00014. Number, on November 20, 2006, of UK Web
pages using the word &amp;#34;spooktacular&amp;#34;: 18,700
15. Amount a parapsychology study in Northampton offers (June 2006) to
pay volunteers: &amp;#163;250&lt;br/&gt;
16. Number of angels spotted over the Thames near the London Eye: 1
17. Proportion of people who normally hear voices in their heads: 1 in
25&lt;br/&gt;
18. Estimated number of illegal immigrants in the US: 20 million19.
Number of US jobs held by undocumented immigrants: 12 to 15 million
20. Number of actions taken by the US Immigration and Customs
Enforcement agency in 2005 against companies employing illegal workers:
3
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Percentage of UK students who say they believe in creationism and
intelligent design: 3022. Percentage of UK students who say they
believe evolutionary theory is true: 56
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Position of Derren Brown's book &amp;#34;Tricks of the Mind&amp;#34; on the Bad
Psychics' site's list of top five Christmas presents: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Position of the Nintendo Wii: 5&lt;br/&gt;
25. Number of people who died of AIDS in 2006: 2.9 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Air travel these days increasingly requires the willing suspension
of disbelief. At least, it does if you read security expert Bruce
Schneier on the subject; he likes to call much of the harassment we go
through &amp;#34;security theatre&amp;#34;. That is, much of the searching, groping,
and monitoring is, like anyone with commonsense suspects, done more for
show than for effect. There is some justice for this scepticism: a Web
site pilots and crew use to swap work gripes carried many stories of
pilots and engineers being stopped by security from bringing through
soup, toothpaste, and other substances during the worst of the scare.
One rule for all, you say? Only fair? We have to ask: what's the point
of stopping a guy from carrying in a flask of soup when he is the one
who can decide where to drive the plane? Or who can sabotage it merely
by loosening a few bolts? A particular annoyance for many people is the
business of removing shoes so they can be put through the X-ray
machines. The US Transport Safety Administration claims X-ray is &amp;#34;an
effective method of identifying any type of anomaly, including
explosives&amp;#34;, as TSA chief Kip Hawley told a press conference in August,
2006. Not so fast: the Associated Press got its hands on a study by the
Homeland Security Department that begged to differ, concluding that the
X-ray images &amp;#34;do not provide the information necessary to effect
detection of explosives&amp;#34;. CBS News consulted MIT scientist Richard
Lanza, who said an experienced screener could look at the shoe image
and tell if it's been tampered with, but agreed it's not foolproof.
This story ran about a month after the July incidents, in which British
security services claimed to have foiled a plot in which terrorists
planned to blow up planes using liquids brought with them onto
aircraft. The snarky IT news site The Register ran a lengthy
explanation of the unlikelihood of the liquid plot, which was believed
to involve acetone peroxide triacetone triperoxide (TATP). The
Telegraph, however, noted that other substances such as nitroglycerine
or colourless liquid fuel might have been possibilities (the latter in
conjunction with an oxidant carried separately). We are inclined to
agree with comedian George Carlin, who said years ago that passengers
should stop being such wimps. Live a little. Risk being blown up.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;There just isn't a lot of good news when it comes to science
teaching in the UK. In mid-November, the House of Lords Science and
Technology Committee issued a report on science teaching in schools
indicating that:&lt;br/&gt;
- the quality of science teaching is dropping
- kids are consequently being deterred from studying science
- which in turn will lead to even fewer teachers being available
- students are being forced to specialise too young
- and the UK economy will suffer.&lt;br/&gt;
The STC made a number of recommendations. The testing regime should be
altered so that teachers have greater flexibility. Improve pay for
school science technicians. Improve school laboratory design. Look at
practical ways of dealing with health and safety issues. Reduce the
size of &amp;#34;golden hello&amp;#34; signing bonuses and instead offer to write off
student debts in return for four or five years of service. There's a
nice little table of numbers to show the extent of the problem. In the
years from 1996 to 2005, the numbers doing A-level biology rose a bit;
they fell in physics, chemistry, mathematics, and &amp;#34;other&amp;#34;. But this
drop isn't evenly distributed. The report quotes the Royal Society,
whose testimony noted that half of all A-level entries in science come
from just 18 percent of schools. Sceptics don't all come from science
backgrounds; but the more widely science education is diffused through
the population the more sceptics there tends to be. The trends noted in
this report are not a good sign for the future sanity of Britain any
more than they are for the economy.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Darwin for free. Yes: his entire oeuvre is now online at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darwin-online.org/&quot;&gt;www.darwin-online.org&lt;/a&gt;. Everything - published, unpublished, 50,000
searchable text pages, 40,000 images. With much, much more to come;
simply a fabulous resource. Anyone want to fund an AOL sized DVD
distribution?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Apparently personality tests at Tottenham Court Road were no longer
enough. Around the time Tom Cruise was marrying Katie Holmes as
ostentatiously as possible in Italy, Scientology opened a fancy, new
&amp;#163;24 million centre in London (the group claims 123,000 members in the
UK, which would put the cost at &amp;#163;19.51 each). Watched from the
sidelines by a small group of protesters bearing &amp;#34;Stop Scientology&amp;#34;
signs, the opening ceremony featured Scientology leader David Miscavige
and City of London chief superintendent Kevin Hurley. According to a
number of newspapers, freedom of information requests revealed that the
police presence was fuelled by a series of gifts - tickets to film
premieres, invitations to banquets, donations to a children's charity,
and the use of a jazz band - to the police force over the previous 15
months. We predict more controversy for the new centre.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Advertising Standards Authority has been displaying its
sceptical colours again by upholding two complaints made to it over ads
promoting bionetics, a food intolerance test that claims to be able to
diagnose intolerance to 123 foods and ingredients from just a few
strands of your hair. The technology, the bionetics people told the
ASA, is well established, and is based on radionics and applied
kinesiology. The ASA was not impressed by the longevity - thousands of
years - claimed for these techniques in the absence of evidence
supporting their efficacy, despite the submission of a number of
testimonials from customers and the training bionetics claims to give
its technicians. The agency has therefore ruled that the ad may not be
repeated. &amp;#34;We concluded that testimonials alone were not sufficient to
substantiate the efficacy of the testing methods&amp;#34;, the ruling
concludes. That's as well said as if we could have said it ourselves.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Sceptics are fools, according to &amp;#34;Consultant palmist&amp;#34; Terry Stokes,
writing in News Blaze, recently. Describing himself as &amp;#34;like a piano
tuner&amp;#34;, Stokes claims to be able to see people's futures from their
palms; he traces his abilities back to his childhood, and told ESPress
Magazine that when he was a seven-yearold Catholic schoolboy children
used to line up on the playground to get him to read their hands. Most
of his News Blaze piece discusses &amp;#34;Christian extremist&amp;#34; attacks on
astrology. But our favourite bit complains that &amp;#34;the Denialism school
of crackpot conjurer James Randi&amp;#34; attacks both the paranormal and
alternative medicine. And he asks, &amp;#34;Which extremist group funds this
man?&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We note without comment that a user ID that matches the name of Uri
Geller's brother-in-law, Shipi Shtrang, has been posting videos of
Geller's commercials to YouTube. A search on Geller's name should pull
them up nicely - along with other videos of Geller appearances bending
spoons and keys (some with, um, interesting annotations).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (20.1, Spring 2007)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;From Psychic to Sceptic (JamesByrne)
The Great Masturbation Delusion (Hilary Evans)
Making up History (Steuart Campbell)
Darwin Died an Agnostic (Donald Rooum)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Opus Dei: The Truth About its Rituals, Secrets and Power by John L.
Allen
Just Another Day: The Science and Technology of our Everyday Lives by
Adam Hart-Davis
That's Bollocks: Urban Legends, Conspiracy Theories and Old Wives'
Tales by Albert Jack
The Nativity: History and Legend by Geza Vermes&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1,2 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randi.org/&quot;&gt;www.randi.org&lt;/a&gt;; 3 Metro; 4 Evening Standard; 5 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skepchick.org/&quot;&gt;www.skepchick.org&lt;/a&gt;
(profits to fund scholarships); 6,7 Spiked Online (citing 2002 Home
Office study); 8 The Scotsman; 9 The Times; 10 Daily Record; 11 Daily
Mail; 12 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychicevents.co.uk/&quot;&gt;www.psychicevents.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;; 13,14 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.co.uk/&quot;&gt;www.google.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;; 15
&lt;a href=&quot;http://nli.narthampton.ac.uk/ass/psych-stafflrsb/experiments/dmils.htm&quot;&gt;http://nli.narthampton.ac.uk/ass/psych-stafflrsb/experiments/dmils.htm&lt;/a&gt;;
16 South London Press; 17 BBC; 18,19 Bear Stearns study, January 2005;
20 Business Week; 21,22 Guardian; 23,24 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.badpsychics.com/&quot;&gt;www.badpsychics.com&lt;/a&gt;; 25 San
Jose Mercury News
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue’s clippings contributors: Judith Wood, Steuart
Campbell, Tom Ruffles, Ernest Jackson, the Wizard’s Star List, Skeptic
News, Phil McKerracher. A special thank-you to Sid Rodrigues, who
persistently and indefatigably keeps filling The Skeptic's blog
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&lt;/a&gt;) with news stories and pointers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside published
issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To
sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list, visit
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 21st June 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Julian Baggini &amp;#34;Being sceptical of scepticism: Ways of being wrong&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 19th July 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Timothy Good &amp;#34;Need to Know: UFOs, the Military and Intelligence&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 30th August 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Victor Stenger &amp;#34;God: The Failed Hypothesis&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk. Suggestions for speakers or
offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 19.4 (Winter 2006)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20070304120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2007-03-04:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20070304120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2007-03-04T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-03-04T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 19.4 (Winter 2006)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Amount Professor Bruce Hood, professor of psychology at Bristol
University, offers people to wear a used cardigan that has been
thoroughly cleaned: &amp;#163;10&lt;br/&gt;
2. Number who agree to wear it when they find out it belonged to serial
killer Fred West: &amp;#34;few&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Percentage of Americans who are obese: $10,000
4. Percentage of the American Baptists who are: 27
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Number of practicing Scientologists according to the Scientology Web
site: millions&lt;br/&gt;
6. Number of practicing Scientologists estimated by critics, based on
surveys: 100,000 to 200,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Amount raised by a sponsored firewalk for St Vincent's Primary
School, Hull: &amp;#163;9,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of spiritual healers working in Britain: 15,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Amount paid in fees per week from publishers to booksellers to get
new books promoted by retailers into the top ten: &amp;#163;40,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Cost of getting your aura &amp;#34;imaged&amp;#34; by an aura reader at Liverpool
Street Station, London: &amp;#163;45&lt;br/&gt;
11. Cost of the computer system she uses to read auras: &amp;#163;5,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Proportion of patients surveyed at large London HIV clinics who are
using complementary or alternative therapies: almost two-thirds
13. Percentage of those patients who were advised to stop because the
remedies were compromising their HIV management: 11
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Cost on US Airways of checking as baggage a set of antlers: $80
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Proportion of the audience at James Randi's fourth Amazing Weekend
who were women: over a third
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Number of Americans injured annually by drug errors in hospitals,
nursing homes, and doctors' offices: over 1.5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Amount New Jersey resident Jackie Haughn paid &amp;#34;psychic&amp;#34; con artist
&amp;#34;Anne Marie&amp;#34; (Tammy Mitchell) over a period of months to remove a
curse: $220,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Date on which it became legal in the UK for homoeopathic remedies
to make medical claims with no supporting evidence: September 1, 2006
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Number of people who drank from a heavily polluted Arabian Sea
creek after claims that its water had miraculously turned sweet and
could cure illness until police stopped the rush on the grounds that
the water was too dangerously polluted to drink: 5,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Average number of minutes British men spend on foreplay: 17.44
21. Average number of minutes British men last from foreplay to climax:
18.64
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Multiple by which the death rate among South African women aged 30
to 34 rose between 1997 and 2004, largely due to AIDS: 4.6
23. Multiple by which the death rate among South African men aged 40 to
44 rose in those same years, ditto: 2
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Amount offered by filmmaker Adam Muskiewicz for proof that Elvis is
alive: $3 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Percentage of UK population that does not want public money spent
on building laboratories to carry out tests on animals for medical
research: 57&lt;br/&gt;
26. Number of animal experiments conducted in the UK in 2005: 2,896,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;A study of Carmelite nuns conducted by Dr Mario Beauregard at the
department of psychology at the Universit&amp;#233; de Montr&amp;#233;al suggests that
whatever causes belief in God it's not a specific physical structure in
the brain. Fifteen nuns aged between 23 and 64 were asked to relive a
mystical experience while undergoing a functional magnetic resistance
imaging scan, a technique that images brain activity by mapping changes
in blood flow. Previous tests with actors had established that brain
activity in a particular emotional state is the same whether the
subject is actually living the emotions or entering the same emotional
state voluntarily. The upshot: Beauregard and his team found that a
dozen different brain regions were activated during the mystical
experience, but that there was no one &amp;#34;God spot&amp;#34; in which spirituality
takes place. Writing angrily in the Telegraph the day after the news
broke, Steve Jones, professor of genetics at University College London,
demanded to know why anyone thought there should be and accused &amp;#34;the
brain-scanning business&amp;#34; of losing its scientific basis. There's more
to spirituality and consciousness, he argued, than simple biology. We
had expected a different sort of angry argument. Surely someone out
there will postulate that the sort of person who becomes a cloistered
nun has the sort of brain that responds differently and more powerfully
to mystical experiences. You know, like the difference between a social
drinker and an alcoholic.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We were fascinated to learn – from a Times clipping sent by one of
our contributors – that Christ is buried in Japan. His brother,
Isukiri, is buried nearby. No, we didn't know there was a brother
either. According to the farming village of Shingo, Jesus spent most of
his life in Japan. According to local legend (as filtered through a
Japan travel site), Jesus spent 11 years in Japan, starting when he was
21. He returned to Judea at 33, where his teachings about Japan were
considered too radical. It was not Jesus but his brother Isukiri who
was crucified. Christ himself escaped with his disciples (and some
locks of the Virgin Mary's hair and his brother's ear, it says here)
and travelled across Siberia back to Japan. There, he made his way to
Shingo, where he took the name Taro Jurai, got married, fathered three
daughters, and lived to the age of 106. Our travel site describes
Shingo as ultra-remote and consisting of just a grocery store and a
&amp;#34;sprinkling&amp;#34; of farmhouses. If you'd rather make the somewhat easier
trip to Jerusalem, we can't blame you. But hey – more trouble for the
Shroud of Turin, dontcha think?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;After years of debate it's finally happened: Pluto isn't a planet
any more. The reason is not that Pluto has fallen down on the job but
that astronomers have agreed on a changed set of planetary criteria
that Pluto just doesn't quite meet. Pluto now classifies as a &amp;#34;dwarf
planet&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;trans-Napetunian object&amp;#34; and, to add insult to other
insult, its former planetary status is being defended by some
astrologers (others are writing it off as not terribly important in the
first place). Russell Grant is, apparently, one such, telling the press
that he would &amp;#34;continue to use Pluto because he gives me the ability to
look into people's charts and see where they're coming from
psychologically.&amp;#34; Scorpios in particular are in big trouble: their sign
is (was?) ruled by Pluto. Who wants to be born under the sign of UB313?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;A certain notoriety was accorded this year's Britiah Association for
the Advancement of Science festival when the BA chose to include in the
programme a panel featuring Rupert Sheldrake (presenting his phone
telepathy research), Peter Fenwick (presenting his studies of
near-death experiences), and Deborah Delanoy (recounting a study in
which volunteers were asked to try to arouse or calm down another
person by thinking about them). The panel, which included Chris French
for some kind of balance, was organised by the Scientific and Medical
Network, an organisation founded in 1973 that describes itself as &amp;#34;a
trans-disciplinary forum for people exploring the interface of science,
medicine, and spirituality&amp;#34;. The controversy was amusing for a few
reasons. First of all, if you object to the inclusion of such a panel
in your science programme there's a simple solution: don't go to it and
persuade other people to skip it, too. Second of all, the newspapers
reporting on the incident on the science pages are, on other pages,
perfectly happy to run uncritical articles featuring this type of
research. Third of all...everyone wrote up the controversy over the
panel, but so far as we can tell no one bothered to write up the
panel's actual content. What happened there, guys?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Some time back, we noted the curious case of the multi-faceted
Matthew Parris, who in addition to being a Times columnist and former
MP likes to conduct scientific experiments on himself regarding the
effect of cosmetics. At the time, Parris had conducted a controlled
experiment in which he daubed the dry skin on one of his legs with, for
a month each in succession, moisturiser, Vaseline, and engine oil. All
had worked approximately the same. More recently, Parris was in the
news for not washing his hair for ten years. At least, that's the way
some of the disgusted commentators put it. In fact, what Parris does is
rinse it daily in warm water while massaging his scalp, a very
different kettle of leave-in conditioner. The story came out when he
challenged Andrew Marr to do the same.The reaction to this revelation
says a lot about the kind of paranoia hair care product vendors have
managed to sell. One of the five women who accepted a Daily Mail
challenge to use the Parris method for six weeks, for example, became
utterly unhinged by her conviction that her hair looked horrible (in
the after photo, it looked absolutely fine). She gave up makeup and
wearing nice clothes, and began going up to strangers on the street she
thought were staring at her hair and telling them her hair didn't
really look like that normally. The really startling bit was that these
women averaged &amp;#163;40 a month on hair care products. They might do well to
look at the Beauty Brains (thebeautybrains.blogspot.com), where two
industry scientists combine inside knowledge and skepticism to explain
how products work and why the same ingredients mean the &amp;#163;40 bottle of
conditioner is the same as the &amp;#163;2.50 bottle. Since the hair fuss,
Parris was in the news again for dismissing terrorism as nothing more
than &amp;#34;a big, bloody nuisance&amp;#34;. Not such a nuisance for him: other
people may have to toss their shampoo at the security gate. Parris can
find his anywhere he goes.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Security must be seen to be done. Not in order to protect us,
necessarily, but in order to make us feel protected. As long ago as the
1970s the TV series &amp;#34;Yes, Minister&amp;#34; recognised this when Humphrey
Appleby explained that the purpose of Britain's defence policy was &amp;#34;to
make people believe Britain is defended.&amp;#34; No, not the Russians – the
British. The American security specialist Bruce Schneier calls it
&amp;#34;security theatre&amp;#34;. Matthew Parris was just one of many commentators
weighing in on the sense – or lack thereof – of, as one CEO put it on
CNBC &amp;#34;fighting terrorism by throwing out toothpaste in North Dakota&amp;#34;.
The most interesting analysis came from Daniel Finkelstein, the son and
sibling of a clutch of mathematicians. Writing in The Times,
Finkelstein took on the argument that the costs of terrorism itself are
not particularly significant (he cited Professor John Mueller, in a
paper published by the libertarian Cato Institute). Finkelstein cited
the Wall Street trader and mathematician Nassim Nicholas Taleb and his
book Fooled by Randomness to explain that what matters is not the
probability of an event but the extent of the damage should it occur.
In addition, he said, it's wrong to judge the costs of terrorism as if
anti-terrorist measures were not already in place acting as deterrents.
So, he concluded, Parris was both right and wrong. Our view is somewhat
different. We think that the fear of terrorism is being used to justify
significant increases in surveillance and losses of freedom that the
general public would never have accepted otherwise and that make no
rational sense if the goal is to combat terrorism rather than increase
the power of the state.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;While we were following links and finding stories for this issue, we
discovered the existence of UK-Skeptics (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptics.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptics.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;),
administered by John Jackson and stating as one of its aims and
objectives &amp;#34;To complement other skeptics' organisations and the work
they do&amp;#34;. We always like to be complemented. UK-Skeptics seem to be
progressing nicely towards filling their Web site with the kinds of
backgrounders we always thought &lt;em&gt;we&lt;/em&gt; should do, and, since they are
apparently more efficient than we are, they are already selling
T-shirts (we like their legend &amp;#34;?keptic&amp;#34;. So now the UK has three
skeptical organisations. Anybody want to start a fourth so we can claim
parity with the humanists? Or can we count Skeptics in the Pub?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (19.4, Winter 2006)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Just Who Wrote the Passion of Christ by Emmerich? (Wolf Roder)
What Colour is Four? The Perception of Synaesthesia in Art and Science
(Stephen Moston)
Alexander the Oracle-Monger (Adam Buick)
A Physiological Reason why Superman Behaves like a Boy Scout (Robert
Castro)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;A Mind of Its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives by Cordelia
Fine
The Penguin Guide to the Superstitions of Britain and Ireland by Steve
Roud
Evil Incarnate: Rumors of Demonic Conspiracy &amp;#38; Satanic Abuse in History
by David Frankfurter
Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive by Jared Diamond&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1,2 BBC News; 3,4 Independent on Sunday; 5
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientology.org/en_US/news-media/index.html;&quot;&gt;www.scientology.org/en_US/news-media/index.html;&lt;/a&gt; 6 The Observer; 7 Hull
Daily Mail; 8 Edzard Ernst, in The Lady; 9 The Times; 10, 11
ThisislocalLondon.co.uk; 12,13 AidsMap.com; 14 US Airways Web site; 15
Skeptical Inquirer; 16 Institute of Medicine via Associated Press; 17
ABC News (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skepdic.com/&quot;&gt;www.skepdic.com&lt;/a&gt;); 18 MHRA press release (via
badscience.net); 19 The Observer; 20 21 Men's Health Magazine (via
Manchester Evening News); 22,23 New York Times; 24 multiple sources; 25
Newsnight poll; 26 BBC
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue’s clippings contributors: Judith Wood, Steuart
Campbell, Tom Ruffles, Ernest Jackson, the Wizard’s Star List, Skeptic
News, Phil McKerracher. A special thank-you to Sid Rodrigues, who
persistently and indefatigably keeps filling The Skeptic's blog
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&quot;&gt;http://ukskeptic.livejournal.com&lt;/a&gt;) with news stories and pointers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside published
issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To
sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list, visit
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 15th March 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Jean La Fontaine &amp;#34;Hidden Enemies&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 19th April 2007&lt;br/&gt;
To be announced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 17th May 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Mike Heap &amp;#34;Suggestion, the paranormal and unusual claims&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697.
Suggestions for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 19.3 (Autumn 2006)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20061206120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2006-12-06:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20061206120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2006-12-06T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2006-12-06T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 19.3 (Autumn 2006)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Number of random drug tests carried out on pupils aged 11 to 18 at a
school in Faversham, Kent, as a trial: 600
2. Percentage of parents who agreed to their children being tested: 86
3. Number of positive tests: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Proportion of British men aged 25 to 49 who visited a porn Internet
site in April 2006: one in four&lt;br/&gt;
5. Percentage of British couples consulting Relate who cite Internet
pornography as a factor in their troubles: 40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Number of people the World Health Organisation estimates die
annually worldwide from tobacco-related illnesses: 5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Percentage of apples on sale in British shops that are home-grown:
40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Anniversary celebrated in May 2006 by Britain's longest-married
living couple: 78
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Average sentence length in novels appearing on the New York Times
bestseller list in 1936: 22.8 words&lt;br/&gt;
10. Average sentence length in novels appearing on the New York Times
bestseller list in 1996: 16.55 words&lt;br/&gt;
11. Percentage of the novels appearing on the New York Times bestseller
list in 1936 that was dialogue: 2512. Percentage of the novels
appearing on the New York Times bestseller list in 1996 that was
dialogue: 35&lt;br/&gt;
13. Number of recognised miraculous healings at Lourdes since 1858:
6714. Number since 1978: 4
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Estimated amount Britons spent on herbal, homeopathic, and
aromatherapy products in 2005: &amp;#163;210 million
16. Percent by which sales of those products have risen since 2000: 27
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Amount by which German doctors found that traditionally placed
acupuncture needles reduced migraines in a study of 270 patients: about
half&lt;br/&gt;
18. Amount by which German doctors found that randomly placed
acupuncture needles reduced migraines in that same study: about half
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Cost of an &amp;#34;original Cameron Aurameter&amp;#34; from the British Dowsers
Society: &amp;#163;90
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Amount paid at auction in Qatar for the mobile phone number 666
6666: &amp;#163;1.5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Number of pianos found inside a stone cairn at the top of Ben
Nevis: 1&lt;br/&gt;
22. Number of pounds TV evangelist Pat Robertson, 76, claims his doctor
can leg-press: 2,700
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Amount of funding construction magnate Maurice Laing gave Exeter
University to set up Britain's first chair in complementary medicine in
1993: &amp;#163;1.5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Amount of the population TMers (Transcendental Meditation) say is
needed to reduce the social stress of the population as a whole: the
square root of 1 percent&lt;br/&gt;
25. Fee for TMer's four-day course teaching how to meditate: $2,500
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In response to Prince Charles' campaign for increased access to
alternative medicine via the NHS, 13 leading doctors have written to
every NHS trust asking them to review their practices and cease
promoting &amp;#34;unproven or disproved&amp;#34; treatments such as homeopathy and
reflexology. The Prince, meanwhile, was busy making a speech to the
World Health Organisation in which he lamented the loss of &amp;#34;valuable
traditional knowledge and wisdom&amp;#34; and advocated a more integrated and
&amp;#34;holistic&amp;#34; approach to illness. To be fair to the Prince, his speech
wasn't that unreasonable. He did pay tribute to the successes of
orthodox medicine in, for example, ending smallpox, and much of what he
said was uncontroversial: obesity is on the rise, chronic illnesses due
to unhealthy diets are increasing, and poverty, pollution and intensive
farming contribute further to human ill-health. He never mentions
homeopathy, staying with acupuncture and herbalism. It seems to be the
Prince's view that using alternative therapies can save money. But this
is the point that offends the objecting doctors most: &amp;#34;At a time when
we are struggling to gain access for our patients to Herceptive, which
is absolutely proven to extend survival in breast cancer, I find it
appalling that the NHS should be funding a therapy like homeopathy that
is utterly bogus,&amp;#34; cancer specialist Michael Baum, emeritus professor
of surgery at University College London, told The Times. Others of the
group of protesting doctors are Edzard Ernst, Britain's only chaired
professor of complementary medicine, Nobel Prizewinner Sir James Black,
and six Fellows of the Royal Society. We certainly agree that if the
NHS is having to lay off nurses and restrict access to drugs that are
known to save lives it shouldn't be spending money - especially our
money - on treatments that don't work even if they are emotionally
comforting. On the other hand, it's hard to argue with the Prince's
contention that people would be healthier if they weren't poor, ate
better food, and lived in a less polluted world. Our brains might be
just holistic enough to integrate both those views.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Edinburgh has so many festivals: arts, film, books. Why not ghosts?
In mid-May Scottish Paranormal organised what sounds like a pretty
intriguing event at Mary King's Close, supposedly one of the most
haunted locations in Edinburgh. Excursions (costing &amp;#163;8 to &amp;#163;37) included
storytelling and a tour of the Blair Street Vaults, ghost hunting with
&amp;#34;our guest psychic&amp;#34;, various other psychic investigations, and,
finally, a tasting of single-malt whiskies from a selection of haunted
distilleries. We can't help feeling that the `on-topicness' of that
last foray might be a little thin, though we'd love to know how well
ghosts hold their liquor. Do the cleaning staff have to disinfect
little piles of ectoplasm in the morning?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;At the end of March, the American Heart journal released the results
of a decade-long $2.4 million study of intercessionary prayer funded by
the John Templeton Foundation. Many media sources reported the story.
Researchers divided 1,802 coronary bypass patients at six hospitals
into three groups. One was prayed for and told they were; one was
prayed for and not told whether they were or not; the third were not
prayed for. The prayers themselves were delivered by three expert
congregations (in St. Paul, Minnesota, Worcester, Massachusetts, and
Kansas City, Missouri) who used the patients' first names and initials
of their last names and were instructed to include the phrase, &amp;#34;for a
successful surgery with a quick, healthy recovery and no
complications&amp;#34;. There was no difference in complications or recovery
rates between those who were prayed for and those who were not.
However, there was a slight difference in outcome according to whether
patients knew they were being prayed for or not - and knowing they were
being prayed for didn't help. In fact, 59 percent of those who knew
they were being prayed for suffered complications compared with 51
percent of the group who didn't know. On the other hand, 18 percent of
the group who didn't know had major complications (heart attack,
stroke) compared to 13 percent in the unprayed-for group. The
researchers said both these results could be due to chance. So the
conclusions are still shaky, especially since, as the New York Times
reported, no one has yet come up with a way to control the biggest
problem in such research: knowing how much extraneous prayer is being
given to patients by friends, families, and prayers groups around the
world. One thing we do know: most people want to do something to help
sick people if they can. Good thoughts - wishes, &amp;#34;beams&amp;#34; (as they're
called in some online areas), prayers - are harmless, cheap, and easy
and quick to deliver, and they make givers feel like they're good
people. Hard to stop.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We complain about dumbing-down in the schools and in popular
culture; but how about making miracles less miraculous? Monsignor
Jacques Perrier, Bishop of Tarbes and Lourdes, has decided to recognise
three new categories of healings at Lourdes: unexpected, confirmed, and
exceptional. Until the changes, the rules in force were those laid down
by the Vatican 300 years ago, which required that the illness be
incurable, that there be no medical intervention, that the healing be
instantaneous and complete, and that no later relapse take place. A
tall order. Under these rules, Perrier complained, no cancer cures
could ever take place at Lourdes. Plus, there have been a couple of
healings in the last couple of years these rules excluded that he felt
were miraculous. Whenever the subject of miracles comes up, we always
think of Basava Premanand, convenor of the Indian sceptics, who told us
in an interview in the early 1990s that he debunks miracles because
miracles are how religions sell themselves. Making Lourdes more
competitive with evangelical congregations and all those showy faith
healers on TV may not be uppermost in Perrier's mind (as he says it's
not). But it might help keep those millions of pilgrims coming. Our
prediction: 15 years from now there still won't be any wooden legs or
toupees on the walls of the Lourdes grotto, just like Shaw noted.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Sun reports that Jim Dale, senior meteorologist with British
Weather Services, is warning that this year's changeable weather could
provide the right conditions for a hail of Bizarre Falling Objects -
frogs, fish, hail of toads, perhaps. Good observation areas - should
you wish to be splattered - include Great Yarmouh in Norfolk, east
Manchester, and Ipswich. We note, however, that this story's only
source seems to be The Sun, and also that BWS is a commercial
enterprise selling consultations, weather risk management, insurance,
and so on. They can't - surely - have just been looking for a spot of
free publicity?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Those with Web connections, MP3 players, and a liking for niche
radio might like to check out the interviews our buddies at ASKE
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aske-skeptics.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.aske-skeptics.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;) have been putting up on the Web. At the end
of May, for example, Rick Wood interviewed Dr. Ron Milioni, the mind
behind the specter detector gadgets on the Sci-Fi channel's Ghost
Hunters series, about his efforts to recreate the Ark of the Covenant.
Worth a listen.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (19.3, Autumn 2006)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;'God's Truth', Others' Confusion? (L. J. Hurst)
Is a Grey Heavier Than a Green? (Stephen Moston)
Thomas Hobbes, Angels, Ghosts and Miracles (Adam Buick)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;The Hanged Man: A Story of Miracle, Memory, and Colonialism in the
Middle Ages by Robert Bartlett
The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity by Robert K Merton and Elinor
Barber
Parallel Worlds: The Science of Alternative Universes and Our Future in
the Cosmos by Michio Kaku
Jesus Never Existed by Keneth Humphreys&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1-3 The Times; 4,5 The Register; 6 Reuters; 7 Friends of the Earth; 8
The Independent; 9-12 The Nation; 13,14 The Observer, 15,16 The
Independent; 17,18 BMJ via New Scientist; 19 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.britishdowsers.org/&quot;&gt;www.britishdowsers.org&lt;/a&gt; 20
The Register, 21 Daily Telegraph; 22 CBN; 23 The Observer, 24,25
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tm.org/&quot;&gt;www.tm.org&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue's clippings contributors: Rachel Carthy, Sid
Rodrigues, Steuart Campbell, Tom Ruffles, Ernest Jackson, and the
Wizard's Star List. Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support
and Phil McKerracher for managing the digest subscription list and the
Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside published
issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To
sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list, visit
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 21st December 2006&lt;br/&gt;
Lord Dick Taverne &amp;#34;Sense about Science&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 18th January 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Krissy Wilson &amp;#34;Thanks for the Memories!&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 15th February 2007&lt;br/&gt;
Louis Constandinos &amp;#34;Clarion: A call to rational arms&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697.
Suggestions for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 19.2 (Summer 2006)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20060813120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2006-08-13:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20060813120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2006-08-13T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-13T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 19.2 (Summer 2006)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Number of people living in New Orleans as of February 1, 2006:
130,000&lt;br/&gt;
2. Number of people living in New Orleans pre-Katrina: nearly 500,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Price, with seven days to go, of an &amp;#34;image of Jesus on a piece of
sheet metal New&amp;#34;, on eBay: $1.025
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Percentage of 562 surveyed British children who thought their
fathers were the smartest people in the world: 27
5. Percentage who thought their mothers were: 19
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Number of weeks London mayor Ken Livingstone was suspended by the
Adjudication Panel for England for comparing a reporter from the
Evening Standard to a concentration camp guard: 4
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Number of Fairtrade products available in Britain: 1,300
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of psychics helping search for a prize-winning show whippet
that escaped from a travel cage at New York's Kennedy airport: 12
9. Cost of a &amp;#34;Psychic Journey&amp;#34; at Uri Geller's and Jonathan Cainer's
Psychic Museum in York: &amp;#163;30&lt;br/&gt;
10. Number of &amp;#34;Aura Photographs&amp;#34; included in the price: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Number of British children who run away every year: 100,000
12. Percentage that are under 11: 25
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Amount the Department of Homeland Security spent on antiterrorism
devices between September 11, 2001 and June, 2005: $4.5 billion
14. Amount that was found to be ineffective, unreliable, or too
expensive to operate: almost all
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Average percentage of the UK population that the British believe
are immigrants: 21&lt;br/&gt;
16. Percentage of the UK population that actually are immigrants: 8
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Number of networks that make up the Internet: 250,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Estimated number of Chinese people who start their days by drinking
their own urine: 3 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Age at which babies have shown altruistic behavior: 18 months
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Number of people in the European Union who identify themselves as
Muslims: 20 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Number of intergalactic lovers jazz singer Pamela Stonebrook claims
to have had: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Amount pension obligations add to the cost of every vehicle General
Motors produces: $675
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Number of thymus organs German scientists discovered in 2006 that
mice have: 2&lt;br/&gt;
24. Number chickens have: 10
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Percentage of British children receiving the MMR vaccine: 81
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Science fraud giveth, and science fraud taketh away. The
announcement that Woo Suk Hwang's claimed stem cell research had not
after all produced a human clone continues to reverberate, and the news
continues to get worse. Not only did Hwang violate ethical principles
(duh), but some of his egg donors became ill from the drugs used to
stimulate production, he can't account for $2.6 million in missing
research funds, at least five investigations are continuing in South
Korea and the United States, and some of those investigations are
criminal. Next to all that, the simple retraction of his papers must
seem almost minor. Why do they do it? We know that about 50 percent of
elite athletes, when asked, have said that they would take a drug that
would ensure victory even though it would kill them in five years, but
at least in such a scenario the athlete gets the glory and satisfaction
that comes with winning. Do fraudulent scientists really believe that
they won't get caught? Wouldn't they be better off claiming results
less likely to capture worldwide media attention and therefore somewhat
less scrutiny?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Citizens Advice Bureau issued an advisory in February about
psychic scams: fraudsters who promise to tell people their fortune but
instead take the money and run. Or they send threats, demand money, and
keep demanding it: in one case reported to a CAB, a clairvoyant sent an
elderly man numerous letters accusing him of owing money from a past
life. The CAB stopped short, however, of tackling the question of
whether any horoscopes (or clairvoyance, predictions, and so on) were
actually worth anything. &amp;#34;For most of us reading our horoscope is an
enjoyable way of seeing if we can predict what is coming around the
corner. But it can turn from harmless fun into an expensive and
worrying problem,&amp;#34; the press release reads. We have to say that these
guys are just lazy. With all the horoscopes posted on the Net and in
the newspapers, you'd think it would be just as easy to throw together
a few meaningless sentences to send the dupes. Oh, for the old days,
when a fraudulent psychic did a little honest work.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;A poster to &lt;a href=&quot;news:alt.folklore.urban&quot;&gt;alt.folklore.urban&lt;/a&gt; noted that on a recent weekend
morning a Strange But True short sandwiched between a couple of
cartoons he was watching with his six-year-old son made the claim that
babies don't have kneecaps. It turns out this is not an uncommon myth
(as anyone who's ever actually looked at a small child's knees might
expect) and there are a number of Web sites both promulgating and
debunking this myth. They have kneecaps. The kneecaps just aren't
ossified yet, and so they don't show up on X-rays. They are formed when
the foetus is about three to four months along in development, and are
cartilaginous for the first three (females) to five (males) years of
the child's life. In an unrelated development, the Association of
British Science Writers not only couldn't find a worthy award recipient
in the category for TV programmes for 2005, it couldn't even find
anything worth shortlisting.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;You know, we don't love Harry Potter, and we made fun of JK Rowling
and the water sprite she purchased with her Scottish castle, but it
does seem a bit much that a Vatican official has accused her of luring
children to devil-worship because her books are tainted by the Prince
of Darkness. The Vatican official in question, Father Gabriele Amorth,
is apparently best known for having carried out more than 3,000
exorcisms since 1986. But he's not alone: the current Pope, before he
assumed the Papacy, said three years ago that the books held
&amp;#34;seductions which act unnoticed and by this deeply distort Christianity
in the soul, before it can grow properly&amp;#34;. Kind of ironic, considering
the source.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We note without editorial comment that Ireland Online ran the story
at the beginning of March that Uri teller, who publicly supported
Michael Jackson during the Tatter's trial, has publicly criticized
Jackson for lying to documentary maker Martin Bashir about having
plastic surgery.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Not exactly paranormal but definitely superstitious is the extreme
paranoia with which parts of the US have begun to regard ordinary
household dust and dirt. A recent article in Family Circle recommended:
flushing the garbage disposal with bleach or anti-bacterial cleaner
(and then cleaning the sink and counters to get rid of any matter that
might have flown out); disinfecting can openers; closing the toilet lid
before flushing lest bacteria fly out and contaminate your toothbrush;
microwaving your sponges after use (and replacing them every two
weeks); and cleaning sinks and counters with a solution of 10 percent
bleach after they are touched with so much as a grocery bag. If that
doesn't make you feel clean enough, change your towels every two to
three days; dump your bar soap in favour of liquid because bacteria can
grow on bars; get rid of all carpeting; disinfect doorknobs and remote
controls; clean under the bolts holding down your toilet; and never,
ever, ever wash your clothes with your underwear. The article doesn't
say what to do to protect yourself if you actually dare to get dressed,
brush your teeth, and venture out into the outside world.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Science Magazine, the house publication of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science, ran an interesting essay by Mexican
biology professor Antonio Lazcano, of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma
de Mexico, about the deep roots of evolution in Mexican society -
despite the fact that the country is notoriously Catholic. Many
Americans, Lazcano notes, are under the misapprehension that the
teaching of evolution must necessarily be limited in his country. But
no: the Catholic church does not advocate a literal reading of the
Bible, and Darwin's ideas and Catholic ones manage a peaceful
coexistence, unlike the controversy in some areas of Mexico's bigger
and more powerful neighbour to the north.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The news came through in early February that James Randi was in
hospital after bypass surgery. The most recent word is that he
continues to recover well. Anyone who wants to write to Randi or send a
card may do so via the JREF, 201 SE 12 Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL
33316. Anyone who wants to help is asked to consider donating blood to
the Red Cross, or joining or making a donation to Randi's foundation.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (19.2, Summer 2006)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Natural Science and the Spirit World: Part 2 (Friedrich Engels)
Just Your Imagination? Part 2: Feel The Force (Martin Parkinson)
Discord (Lee Traynor)
Mia Dolan on Granada's This Morning (Tony Youens)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;A Beginner's Guide to Reality by Jim Baggott
Vampire Nation by Arlene Russo
Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science by Steve Fuller
Will Storr vs the Supernatural: One Man's Search for the Truth about
Ghosts by Will Storr&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 Brookings Institution (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brookings.org/metro/katrina.htm);&quot;&gt;www.brookings.org/metro/katrina.htm);&lt;/a&gt; 2
Reuters; 3 eBay; 4,5 Pocket-lint.co.uk; 6 press reports; 7 Observer; 8
Associated Press; 9,10 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychicmuseum.com/&quot;&gt;www.psychicmuseum.com&lt;/a&gt; ; 11,12 Children's
Society, cited in Evening Standard; 13,14 Bruce Schneier's Weblog;
15,16 Harper's Index; 17 Vint Cerf, in testimony before the US Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; 18 Outside
Magazine; 19 Science (via BBC); 20 The New Yorker; 21 Metro; 22
Harper's; 23,24 Nature; 25 Durham University press release
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to this issue's clippings contributors: Rachel Carthy, Sid
Rodrigues,Steuart Campbell, Tom Ruffles, Ernest Jackson, the Wizard's
Star List, Skeptic News,and Phil McKerracher. Thanks to Rachel Carthy
for administrative support and Phil McKerracher for managing the digest
subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside published
issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To
sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list, visit
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 24th August 2006&lt;br/&gt;
Note: Date change! Martin Poulter &amp;#34;Scientology: It's worse than you
think&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 26th October 2006&lt;br/&gt;
Note: Date change! Richard Wiseman &amp;#34;Television and the paranormal, the
need for positive skepticism, religious belief, magic, and the science
of speed dating&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697.
Suggestions for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 19.1 (Spring 2006)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20060528120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2006-05-28:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20060528120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2006-05-28T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-28T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 19.1 (Spring 2006)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Number of pounds of carbon dioxide emissions produced annually by
the average American: 12,000&lt;br/&gt;
2. Percentage this represents of CO2 emissions worldwide: 36.1
3. Percentage the US represents of the world's population: 5
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Percentage of executives at large companies who say their
communications are unmanageable: 25
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Number of UFO sightings in 2005 in the eight-mile of North Yorkshire
between Scarborough and Filey: 85
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Amount of money spent annually in Britain on gambling: &amp;#163;64 billion
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Length of time it takes mass-produced British bread to rise, ready
for baking: 3 minutes
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of Britons who consult homeopaths each year: 470,000
9. Amount Britons spend annually on homeopathy: about &amp;#163;25 million
10. Percentage of British GPs who refer patients to homeopaths: up to
40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Percentage of British school-aged children who will be obese by
2020 if current eating habits persist: more than half
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Percentage of airline passengers in 568 crashes between 1983 and
2000 who survived without serious injury: 95
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Price of a magnetic device called MoodMaker intended to cure
impotence: &amp;#163;49.99
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Percentage of mercury found in Fufang Lulhui Jiaonang capsules by
the MHRA in an unannounced April 2005 inspection: 13
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Amount fraudsters operating a letter-writing scam and claiming to
be clairvoyant asked Thames Valley residents to pay to protect
themselves from an evil presence: &amp;#163;17
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Number, out of nine, of Dover, Pennsylvania school board voted out
after the debate over whether to teach Intelligent Design landed in
court: 8&lt;br/&gt;
17. Percentage of the population who voted: 16
18. Kansas Board of Education vote to redefine science so that it is no
longer limited to the search for natural explanations: 6-4
19. Number of US states that have had some local or state level
anti-evolution activity: 40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Percentage of Americans who go to church at least once a week who
voted for Bush: 61&lt;br/&gt;
21. Percentage of American church attenders who never attend church who
voted for Bush: 37
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Estimated number of people in Britain who claim to have psychic
abilities: 150,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Number of pieces of peer-reviewed research that has been published
about Flying Spaghetti Monsterism: 2
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Number of cows a Leeds woman was told by a local healer to
slaughter to save her relationship: 3
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Percentage of US meals consumed in cars: 19
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for contributions to Sid Rodrigues and Jason C. Snowden.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Anyone who has an email address knows that a mainstay of the torrent
of junk that bombards us daily is the offer of breast enlargement.
Spammers are always coy about the exact method by which the enlargement
will be accomplished (we refuse to say &amp;#34;enhancement&amp;#34;; bigger is not
always better). Steve Burgess, who runs a National Therapy Centre in
Beverley, North Yorkshire, however, has a method we suspect the
spammers are not using: hypnosis. Yes. We first heard of Burgess via a
clipping from the Hull Daily Mail sent in by one of our Yorkshire
correspondents. It credulously recounted the usual stuff: depression,
alcoholism, smoking, weight loss, past-life regression, alien
abductions, in which he now believes because of his patients' stories,
yada, yada, yada. And then we looked at his Web site, where he claims
this more unusual service &amp;#34;really works&amp;#34;. Exclamation point. Burgess
claims that success in this area has been documented as far back as
1949, and says, &amp;#34;It's a well known fact within the hypnotherapy
profession that the mind can effect phenomenal changes on the body&amp;#34;.
If, he argues, hypnosis can cure illness and get rid of pain, then it's
only logical to use it to increase the flow of blood to the breasts and
reposition fat. &amp;#34;The fat is usually taken from the waist area, so there
is often a reduction in waist size or shape also.&amp;#34; Of course, you can
achieve the same effect with better posture... &amp;#34;Don't laugh,&amp;#34; his Web
site advises before explaining all this. Sorry. Will too.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Daily Mail revealed in October that the TV show Most Haunted was
a fake, when one of its own stars, resident parapsychologist Dr Ciaran
O'Keeffe, blew the whistle, saying people were being deceived by
&amp;#34;showmanship and dramatics&amp;#34; and that, &amp;#34;In my opinion, we're not dealing
with genuine mediumship&amp;#34;. The Mail also said it had obtained unedited
footage in which the show's presenter, Yvette Fielding, and her husband
faked ghostly knocks and bumps. O'Keeffe, who is a psychology lecturer
at Liverpool Hope University, is (according to his Web site, at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theparapsychologist.com/&quot;&gt;www.theparapsychologist.com&lt;/a&gt;) working on a doctorate under the
supervision of Richard Wiseman.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;There's been a lot of discussion lately about alternative remedies
and their funding by the NHS. You can see why the alternative
therapists would want it: there's a]ot of gold in them thar government
hills. The government's own ideas are likely to be more divided between
the expense of funding more types of treatments and the savings due to
the fact that things like faith healing and homeopathy are cheaper than
things like MRI scans and Avonex. Long-term, of course, while some
people's bodies will heal naturally, with or without any kind of
remedy, the really serious ailments will become much more expensive
because the later you begin to treat a condition, the more expensive
the treatment is likely to be. Opinions seem to be seriously divided,
sometimes within the same publication. The Yorkshire Post, for example,
wrote an admiring piece about the prospects for using acupuncture in
A&amp;E. And of course most publications frequently run credulous pieces
about this or that fashionable therapy. One that stood out, however,
was Nick Cohen, writing in The Observer, who argued that spending
public money on alternative remedies, even if doing so is popular, is
wrong because &amp;#34;the government is dealing in deceit...a government which
is prepared to deceive about medicine will deceive about much else
besides&amp;#34;. Like that's a new phenomenon?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Yet another prospective cold remedy has bitten the dust: a study in
the New England journal of Medicine in July found that Echinacea does
not protect against (or cure) the common cold (or what one friend calls
&amp;#34;man-flu&amp;#34;). The Observer's writer, Dr John Biffa, didn't like the
conclusion, and therefore carped about the study's methods, complaining
that instilling rhinovirus into test subjects' nostrils isn't how
people are actually exposed to colds in the real world. Well, it isn't
- but it's how colds have been studied for decades. You might expect
people to be more prone to catch a cold with such a method, but if
Echinacea had a protective effect you'd still expect the symptoms to be
less severe. We have a little more sympathy with Biffa's complaint
about Wallace Sampson's editorial in the same issue of NEJM questioning
why scientists test such remedies as Echinacea when they are unproven;
rather, he thought that research and public funding should be focused
on things that have a reasonable chance of working. Sampson's
reasoning: people continue to use things like Echinacea even when
they've been shown not to work, so why bother? In the end because, we
think, consumers deserve to make an informed choice, even if the choice
they make is a stupid one. Still, not much comfort if you have a cold:
Echinacea doesn't work, vitamin C doesn't work, going to bed and
drinking hot lemon and honey doesn't work. You might as well try the
final suggestion from Mark Twain's How to Cure a Cold, written in 1863:
two quarts of whiskey every 24 hours. &amp;#34;Let them try it - if it doesn't
cure them, it can't do more than kill them.&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We may, just may, have seen the last of the sane phase of the fights
over whether MMR vaccines are linked to autism. In late October, the
Cochrane Collaboration released its systematic review of the literature
and concluded that MMR is probably safe and not linked to autism.
However, as Dr Michael Fitzpatrick, a GP and author of MMR and Autism:
What Parents Need to Know, points out in a Spiked Online editorial,
this hasn't stopped the Daily Mail from insisting that the Cochrane
review has it all wrong, while Private Eye has gone on saying that the
scare's originator, Andrew Wakefield, has been unjustly vilified but
adding that it's been pro-immunization all along. Wakefield's original
claim was published in 1998; we suspect it will go on being repeated
for the rest of our sceptical lives. As &amp;#34;Bad science&amp;#34; columnist Ben
Goldacre wrote in the Guardian, &amp;#34;Health scares are like toothpaste:
they're easy to squeeze out, but very difficult to get back in the
tube&amp;#34;. We couldn't have said it better ourselves.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It was with a heavy heart that we read online that Scott Adams,
creator of Dilbert, the comic strip that exposes the utter absurdity of
modern office life, has posted a defence of Intelligent Design on his
blog (&lt;a href=&quot;http://dilbertblog.typepad.com&quot;&gt;http://dilbertblog.typepad.com&lt;/a&gt;). A careful reading of what Adams
actually said shows this isn't true: what he says is, &amp;#34;I'd be surprised
if 90 percent-plus of scientists are wrong about the evidence for
Darwinism. But if you think it's impossible you've led a sheltered
life.&amp;#34; After all, he argues, in a corporate setting lots of reasons are
given to justify beliefs that when examined don't hold water. The ID
people allege that within each field where evidence is found to support
Darwinism there are some experts who are not convinced. Therefore,
isn't it possible that scientists are giving in to peer-pressure?
Naturally, we hope that science doesn't work like any of the
corporations Adams has known. Unfortunately, there are human beings
everywhere, so you never know. Meanwhile, the best argument we've heard
comes from a friend who is seven months pregnant: &amp;#34;No one would make
ribs this unbendy if they had planned such a large person to be kicking
them / fitting behind them along with all the other stuff that normally
takes up the space. Intelligent design my arse&amp;#34;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Center for Inquiry, the parent organization of CSICOP (which
assists us with production, printing, and posting The Skeptic), has
been granted special consultative status as a non-governmental
organization under the United Nations Economic and Social Council. This
status will allow the Center for Inquiry to participate in meetings and
conferences open to NGOs, which can only be good news for the endeavour
of spreading scientific rationalism. Congrats to CSICOP.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (19.1, Spring 2006)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Second Sight? Or Just the Blind Leading the Blind? (Krissy Wilson)
Just Your Imagination? Part 1: Acting (Martin Parkinson)
The Mystery of Hellfire Pass: Part Three (Paul Chambers and Robert
Bartholomew)
Natural Science and the Spirit World: Part One (Friedrich Engels)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Darwin's Legacy: What evolution means today by John Dupr&amp;#233;
Eight Preposterous Propositions by Robert Ehrlich
The Men Who Stare at Goats by Jon Ronson
The Science of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Michael Hanlon&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 The New Yorker; 2 BBC; 3&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bep.treas.gov/store/section.cfm/73/435&quot;&gt;http://www.bep.treas.gov/store/section.cfm/73/435&lt;/a&gt;; 4 Business Week
(McKinsey report); 5 Yorkshire Post; 6 The Times; 7 Daily Telegraph;
8,9,10 The Independent; 11 Barnardos research study; 12 Skeptical
Inquirer (statistic from NTSB); 13 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dash.co.uk/&quot;&gt;www.dash.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;; 14 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mhra.gov.uk/&quot;&gt;www.mhra.gov.uk&lt;/a&gt;;
15 BBC; 16,17 Austin American Statesman; 18 Independent; 19 National
Center for Science Education; 20,21 Business Week; 22 Channel 5; 23 The
Panda's Thumb blog (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pandasthumb.org/&quot;&gt;www.pandasthumb.org&lt;/a&gt;); 24 Yorkshire Post; 25
Harper's (Culinary Institute)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks for contributions to Sid Rodrigues and Jason C. Snowden. Thanks
to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil McKerracher for
managing the digest subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional
mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;.
A free sample issue is available in return for a self-addressed stamped
A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For
pricing and availability of back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web
page or the back page of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment
by credit card or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank
(sorry, but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders
are impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 22nd June 2006&lt;br/&gt;
Note: Date change! Lynette Davidson &amp;#34;Bad History?&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 24th August 2006&lt;br/&gt;
Note: Date change! Martin Poulter &amp;#34;Scientology: It's worse than you
think&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697.
Suggestions for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 18.4 (Winter 2005)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20060403120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2006-04-03:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20060403120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2006-04-03T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2006-04-03T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 18.4 (Winter 2005)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Percentage of conclusions drawn in papers published in scientific
journals that are arguably false: 50
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Government's estimate of cost of the national ID card: &amp;#163;5.5 billion
3. LSE's estimate of cost of the national ID card: &amp;#163;19.2 billion
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Percentage of UK hospital consultants suffering from poor mental
health and emotional burnout in 1994: 27
5. Percentage of UK hospital consultants suffering from poor mental
health and emotional burnout in 2002: 32
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Average length of calls to phone psychics: 30 minutes
7. Average cost per minute of those calls: $1 to $4
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of acupuncture colleges in the US: 20
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Cost to spend 32 hours in Montana's Radon Health Mine: $150
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Bookmakers' odds that Elvis is still alive: 1000/1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Percentage of Americans who think that creationism should be taught
alongside evolution in public schools: nearly 67
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Percentage of the human and chimpanzee genomes that are the same:
96
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Number of divorces in Britain in 2004: 167,116
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Number of years the Home Office would like Britons to go to jail
for downloading violent pornography: 3
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Amount psychic Miriam Gifford charges for &amp;#34;soul retrieval&amp;#34;: &amp;#163;35-&amp;#163;50
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Cost of a holiday for your teddy bear offered by a German travel
agent: &amp;#163;68 to &amp;#163;100
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. The answer to the puzzle &amp;#34;(first 10 digit prime in consecutive
digits of e).com&amp;#34; that Google posted on billboards in Silicon Valley in
2004 as part of a recruitment drive: 7427466391
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Amount Scientology charges actors for workshops at its Los Angeles
Celebrity Center designed to help them succeed in show business: $17
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Percentage of voices in hallucinations (among both men and women)
that are male: 71
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Height of a statue of St Anthony of Padua, patron saint of lost and
stolen items, that disappeared from a Peterborough church in July 2005:
two feet
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Amount for which athletes swimming in Loch Ness as part of
Scotland's July 2005 triathlon were insured against monster bites: &amp;#163;1
million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Amount for which a Russian astrologer sued NASA in &amp;#34;moral damages&amp;#34;
for molesting a comet (using the Deep Impact probe) and disrupting the
moral balance of the universe: &amp;#163;310 Million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Date of the first wedding in Britain legally carried out by a
humanist celebrant: June 18, 2005
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Percentage of global greenhouse gas emissions caused by the UK: 3
25. Percentage of the world's population that lives in the UK: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for contributions to Sid Rodrigues and Jason C. Snowden.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;As if the Kansas Board of Education didn't have enough problems
trying to decide how the world began, in June 24-year-old Bobby
Henderson of Corvallis, Oregon, sent them a letter saying that if they
were going to require Intelligent Design to be taught in Kansas science
classrooms alongside evolution, he felt strongly that they should
include the &amp;#34;alternative theory&amp;#34; of Intelligent Design he espouses. To
wit: the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster, who
continues to change scientific measurements relating to evolution with
His Noodly Appendage. &amp;#34;We have evidence&amp;#34; he wrote, adding, &amp;#34;it is
disrespectful to teach our beliefs without wearing His chosen outfit,
which of course is full pirate regalia.&amp;#34; Henderson included - and has
reproduced on his Web site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.venganza.org/&quot;&gt;www.venganza.org&lt;/a&gt; - a graph showing the
correlation between the declining number of pirates in the world and
global warming. Henderson's letter has been joined by many others from
Pastafarians, as Flying Spaghetti Monster worshippers are known. And
the cult is growing, supported by sales of T-shirts, coffee mugs, and
other items. BoingBoing, a blog run by three California technologists
and writers who post about pop culture oddities, posted a small item
about Pastafarianism's growing popularity, which in turn got them a
large mailbag of complaints from ID supporters. Some of these pointed
the BoingBoing writers at the work of Kent Hovind, who founded Creation
Research Evangelism in 1989 and who has a standing promise to pay
$250,000 to anyone who can give any empirical evidence for evolution.
BoingBoing, not to be outdone, made a counter-offer: &amp;#34;We are willing to
pay any individual $250,000 if they can produce empirical evidence
which proves that Jesus is not the son of the Flying Spaghetti
Monster.&amp;#34; After reader donations flooded in, BoingBoing raised its
prize to $1 million but has capped it there &amp;#34;in part because the number
contains a lot of pretty, round zeroes that resemble holy meatballs&amp;#34;.
Three members of the Kansas Board of Education have said they will
support the inclusion of the Flying Spaghetti Monster in the science
curriculum. It is as 'logical' as any other theory&amp;#34;, wrote one.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In August, The Lancet published the results of a Swiss-UK review of
110 trials of homeopathy, matched with 110 conventional medicine
trials, and concluded that &amp;#34;the clinical effects of homeopathy are
placebo effects&amp;#34;. The article noted that in both types of trial
smaller, lower quality trials showed more beneficial treatment effects
than the larger, higher quality ones, suggesting that bias might be a
possible explanation for any positive findings. The journal's editors
took advantage of the article's publication to stage a militant attack
on homeopathy's continued popular acceptance, saying &amp;#34;For too long, a
politically correct laissez-faire attitude has existed towards
homoeopathy...Now doctors need to be bold and honest with their
patients about homeopathy's lack of benefit, and with themselves about
the failings of modern medicine to address patients' needs for
personalised care&amp;#34;. Investment in research should stop (despite the
editors' comment, &amp;#34;The more dilute the evidence for homeopathy becomes,
the greater seems its popularity&amp;#34;). The editorial also notes that the
Swiss government has withdrawn insurance coverage for homeopathy and
four other complementary treatments &amp;#34;because they did not meet efficacy
and cost-effectiveness criteria&amp;#34;. Meanwhile, the Patients Association
has called for all GPs to provide patients with the choice of using
complementary medicine - although this demand is qualified with &amp;#34;where
it has been proven to work&amp;#34;. We psychically predict no such sanity will
hold sway in Britain as long as the Royal Family and other celebrities
continue to support homeopathy. And they do: not content with issuing a
guide to alternative therapies earlier this year, Prince Charles
commissioned a report from an independent economist, published in
autumn 2005, into how much money alternative therapies could save the
NHS. We have to suppose the answer will be 'lots': cheaper therapies,
and then the patients die faster.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;At last, a practical reason not to indulge in paranormal beliefs.
The Times recently reported on the case of Herve Vandrot, a French
amateur psychic studying botanics at Edinburgh University. It seems
that Vandrot placed the crystal ball he uses for his psychic pastime on
his window sill and sallied forth to Edinburgh's Royal Botanic Garden.
By the time he came back, sun shining through the crystal ball - nice,
clear, round glass, filled with liquid, a perfect concentrator for a
sunbeam - onto a pile of washing had started a fire, and both his flat
and two others had been destroyed. Several more were uninhabitable.
Vandrot spoke up in defence of his crystal ball, but the fire-fighters
were adamant it had caused the fire. Now, we know you're going to say
he should have known...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The US has sent a proposal to the International Telecommunications
Union, which is responsible for the broadcasts that allow us all to
synchronize our watches, to the effect that the practice of adding leap
seconds should be abandoned. The problem in a nutshell: GPS can't
handle them. Currently, time as we know it is measured in two ways:
first, the atomic clock whose electrons decay at precisely the right
intervals; second, the rotation of the earth. Because the earth's
rotation is uneven, every so often the difference between the two times
must be corrected by adding (or subtracting, though this has so far
never happened) a leap second. Humans barely notice. But time and
location are intimately connected, and the difference between atomic
time and universal time (formerly known as GMT) has reached 32 seconds,
with GPS stuck in the middle, 19 seconds behind atomic time (TAI) and
13 seconds ahead of universal time (UTC). Give it a while longer, and
your taxi may not be able to find your house. But the converse problem
exists for astronomers, who are enraged by the proposal, which would
decouple time from its physical meaning. As Mike Hapgood, the
geophysical secretary of the Royal Astronomical Society explained it,
&amp;#34;One second off will be within beam, but once you disconnect, within
two to three years a spacecraft wouldn't be in the radio beam and you
wouldn't be able to communicate with it&amp;#34;. The ITU discussed the
proposals at its November 2005 meeting.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In August, residents of South Wales experienced a second wave of
&amp;#34;curse letters&amp;#34; - letters that threaten that the recipient's life will
be destroyed unless the person tears the enclosed Jack of Spades into
four pieces and sends them, along with &amp;#163;10, to an address in Austria.
The purported sender, a clairvoyant named Samantha, can't be all that
clairvoyant, since several of the residents so targeted contacted the
South Wales Echo, which promptly alerted readers to the scam. Anyone
receiving such a letter is asked to contact Trading Standards.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Sadly we report the death of Philip J. Klass, who spent much of his
50-year career researching aviation technology and much of his spare
time debunking UFO claims. Born in Iowa, Klass was a senior editor for
Aviation Week &amp;#38; Space Technology, author of five books on UFOs, and a
founder of CSICOP. He died without ever having had to pay out the
$10,000 reward he offered to anyone whose claim to have seen a UFO or
been abducted by an alien could be confirmed by the FBI.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Between issues, read our blog at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/ukskeptic.&quot;&gt;www.livejournal.com/users/ukskeptic.&lt;/a&gt; An RSS feed of The Skeptic's
discussion forum is available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/forum/rss.php.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/forum/rss.php.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (18.4, Winter 2005)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Alien abduction or Bad Medicine? (Jamie McCartney)
The Mystery of Hellfire Pass: Part Two (Paul Chambers and Robert
Bartholomew)
The Problem of the Existence of God seen through the Eyes of a
Physicist (Alfred Bahr)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;The Sense of Being Stared At and Other Aspects of the Extended Mind by
Rupert Sheldrake
The Rise of the Indian Rope Trick by Peter Lamont
Stripping the Gurus: Sex, Violence, Abuse and Enlightenment by Geoffrey
D. Falk&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 Epidemiologist John P A. Ioannidis, in Public Library ofScience
Medicine, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2005/08/30/journal_article_50_o.html;&quot;&gt;www.boingboing.net/2005/08/30/journal_article_50_o.html;&lt;/a&gt; 2
November 2004 estimate,&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/cms/s/fbc6527a-4276-11d9-8e3c-00000e2511c8.html&quot;&gt;http://news.ft.com/cms/s/fbc6527a-4276-11d9-8e3c-00000e2511c8.html&lt;/a&gt;; 3
LSE report, June 2005,&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/pressAndInformationOffice/newsAndEvents/archives/2005/IDCard-FinalReport.htm;&quot;&gt;www.lse.ac.uk/collections/pressAndInformationOffice/newsAndEvents/archives/2005/IDCard-FinalReport.htm;&lt;/a&gt;
4, 5 The Lancet; 6, 7 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-phonepsychic.com/&quot;&gt;www.e-phonepsychic.com&lt;/a&gt;; 8 American Chronicle; 9
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radonmine.com/&quot;&gt;www.radonmine.com&lt;/a&gt;; 10 Channel 4 News; 11 New York Times, July 2005 poll
by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life; 12 Nature; 13 Office for
National Statistics; 14 Theinquirer.net; 15 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychicfayres.co.uk/&quot;&gt;www.psychicfayres.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;; 16
Ananova; 17 mathematician John Allen Paulos, writing in the Guardian;
18 ads in Backstage magazine; 19 BBC, reporting on a study in
NeuroImage; 20 BBC; 21 Guardian; 22 Pravda; 23, 24, 25 BBC
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks for contributions to Sid Rodrigues and Jason C. Snowden. Thanks
to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil McKerracher for
managing the digest subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other e-mail to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: subs at skeptic.org.uk (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: letters at skeptic.org.uk
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses: news at
skeptic.org.uk&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: reviews at skeptic.org.uk
Article ideas and other editorial queries: edit at skeptic.org.uk
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
E-mail one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net/&quot;&gt;www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional
mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or rent the
e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in return
for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year
for UK residents. For pricing and availability of back issues and
non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page of any printed issue.
The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card or by cheques in pounds
Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry, but the banking charges for
foreign cheques and postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is
no relation to the (more recent) American magazine or the (older)
Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets (usually) on the third Thursday of every
month at 7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London
(nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest
speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips
are provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&quot;&gt;www.skeptic.org.uk/pub.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 27th April 2006 (note changed date!): Benjamin Radford
&amp;#34;Applying Science to the Paranormal: The Case of Psychic Detectives&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 15th June 2006: Lynette Davidson &amp;#34;Bad History?&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from pub at skeptic.org.uk or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697.
Suggestions for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 18.3 (Autumn 2005)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20051219120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2005-12-19:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20051219120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2005-12-19T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2005-12-19T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 18.3 (Autumn 2005)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62; &amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
 
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Percentage of drugs approved for use in the US by the FDA that have
not been comprehensively tested on children: 75
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Cost of 1Gb Ghost Radar USB memory stick: &amp;#163;149.99
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Percentage of people in a study by Richard Wiseman reporting unusual
phenomena in &amp;#34;haunted&amp;#34; locations in Mary King's Close in Edinburgh: 78
4. Percentage of people in the same study reporting unusual phenomena
in other locations in Mary King's Close: 48
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Number of US states that between 2001 and 2003 challenged the
teaching of evolution at either the state or local level: 40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Ratio of the population density of Manhattan to the US as a whole:
more than 800:1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Number of people in Britain phoning psychic lines every month:
75,000&lt;br/&gt;
8. Number per month seeing psychics at fairs and in the psychics'
homes: 2,000 to 3,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Number of new species of rodent found on a market stall in Laos: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Number of black rhinos in Africa a century ago: 1 million
11. Number now, due to the demand for rhino horn in Chinese medicine:
2,500
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Percentage of mercury (by weight) found by the MHRA in the Chinese
remedy Fufang luhui jiaonang: 11.7
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Age at which, in 2002, a Hackney girl was nearly drowned in a bag
when family members accused her of being a witch: 8
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Cost of an on-demand mobile phone Tarot reading by Russell Grant:
&amp;#163;1.50
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Date on which the new Broadcasting Code, which restricts programmes
from presenting paranormal phenomena as real before 9pm, comes into
force: July 25, 2005
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Number of confirmed cases of mumps in the UK in 2004: 8,104
17. Number of confirmed cases of mumps in the UK between 1998 and 2003:
3,907
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Date by which BT futurologist Ian Pearson believes that death will
be &amp;#34;not a major career problem&amp;#34;: 2050
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Date by which a &amp;#34;Top TV psychic&amp;#34; working for TV Commerce Group says
that Blair will quit and be replaced by someone other than Gordon
Brown: before mid-November
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Number of glaciers botanist David Bellamy claimed in an April 16
letter to New Scientist were growing instead of shrinking: 555 out of
625&lt;br/&gt;
21. Number Bellamy told Guardian &amp;#34;Junk Science&amp;#34; writer George Monbiot
he actually meant to type: 55%&lt;br/&gt;
22. Percentage that the World Glacier Monitoring Service says is
actually retreating: most
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Number of British homes psychic television channel operator TV
Commerce has access to via Sky Digital: 7.5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Number of years German scientist Michael Werner claims to have
lived off nothing but sunlight and a little fruit juice mixed with
water: 4
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Amount for which a Russian astrologer is suing NASA over its Deep
Impact project, claiming its plans to bombard a comet will &amp;#34;disrupt the
natural balance of the universe&amp;#34;: 8.7 billion roubles
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It seems to be a rule in skepticism that nothing ever stays proven
or undisputed. Somebody always has to find a loophole. In this case,
it's the evergreen Turin Shroud. When last heard from, the Shroud had
been carbon-dated by a team of scientists in 1988, who studied the
fabric and concluded: it's a medieval fake from somewhere between 1260
and 1390 A.D. That, you might have thought, should have been that,
especially after 1998, when Walter McCrone analyzed the shroud and
found traces of chemicals used in common artist's pigments in the 14th
century. In the immediate shock, some Shroud supporters came up with an
explanation for that. The Shroud, they patiently explained, had been
artificially youthened by radiation Jesus emitted at the moment of
death. Other complicated attempts to prove that the Shroud was not a
fake revolve around pollen grains. Teddy Hall, however, the late
scientist who led the Oxford carbon-dating team, never had any doubts
about the results of the 1988 test. We suppose some Shroud believers
must have found that too difficult to believe, because in November 2004
Raymond N. Rogers, a retired chemist from the Los Alamos National
Laboratory published a new study in the journal Thermochimica Acta that
claims that the sample used for the carbon-dating research was taken
from an &amp;#34;expertly rewoven patch&amp;#34;. The Scotsman, which covered the study
in January, simply called the journal &amp;#34;peer-reviewed&amp;#34;. The journal's
pages on the Elsevier Web site describe it as &amp;#34;An International Journal
Concerned with All Aspects of Thermoanalytical and Calorimetric Methods
and their Application to Experimental Chemistry, Physics, Biology and
Engineering&amp;#34;. CSICOP's Joe Nickell, however, has pointed out that
there's no way for Raymond to be sure, since the small sample used in
the carbon-dating tests was destroyed in the process.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;At this year's annual general meeting of the Association of British
Science Writers, Imperial College scientist and journalist Sunny Bains
raised a question: why were British scientific organisations allowing
their research to be funded by money from the American religious right?
She meant the Templeton Foundation, which sponsors fellowships for
science journalists at Cambridge University's Department of Theology, a
$100,000 essay competition, and a prize for &amp;#34;Progress Toward Research
On Discoveries About Spiritual Realities&amp;#34;, whose most recent winner
spoke (expenses paid by the Templeton Foundation) at the Royal Society.
It has also donated &amp;#163;1 million to the Oxford Centre for Science of the
Mind. The Templeton Foundation was created by Sir John Templeton, who
made his money in the financial markets; the Foundation also funds
three prizes for religious journalism and a number of purely religious
activities. In one sense, it doesn't matter where the funding comes
from if the science is sound. But Bains's point in part was that the
Foundation's president, Templeton's son, is also the founder and
chairman of a fundraising organisation for the Bush campaign,
supporting an administration that is notoriously anti-science. The
Foundation itself says it &amp;#34;seeks to focus the methods and resources of
scientific inquiry on topical areas which have spiritual and
theological significance&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;the Foundation seeks to unite credible
and rigorous science with the exploration of humanity's basic spiritual
and religious quests.&amp;#34; It has several different grant-making programs.
First is funding for advanced research in three areas including
&amp;#34;religion, spirituality, healing, and health outcomes&amp;#34;; second is
funding for research into the emergence of biological complexity, which
includes &amp;#34;evolution directionality and convergence&amp;#34;. Finally, there is
a smaller program for local societies of &amp;#34;anyone actively engaged in
the science and religion dialogue&amp;#34;, intended &amp;#34;to promote a balanced and
exploratory dialogue between the discoveries of the natural and social
sciences and the wisdom of the world’s faith traditions.&amp;#34; In general,
skeptics have avoided criticising religion: there is no point in
arguing matters of faith. We stick to things that can be tested and
look at the evidence. But studies such as Cynthia Crossen's 1994 book
Tainted Truth have shown that research generally returns the results
its funders would like. Because of the uneasy recent history of
religious involvement in scientific subjects such as evolution and
medical issues such as abortion, stem cell research, and cloning, it's
worth keeping an eye on the Templeton Foundation's research support.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Richard Smith, former editor of the British Medical Journal,
published an essay in the May 2005 issue of PLoS Medicine (from the
Public Library of Science) claiming that medical journals have become
an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies. The
problem, he explained, is not the one everyone thinks of first, the
pages of advertising that help fund the journal's existence. Instead,
he argued, most clinical trials are funded by pharmaceutical companies,
and favourable trials net them not only pages of apparently objective
coverage in the journal itself through research papers but media
coverage around the world. Unlike advertisements, which doctors and the
public read critically, coverage of research trials is likely to be
viewed as credible. The companies know this, and in some cases spend as
much as a million dollars or more on reprints it can distribute
globally. What makes this all even more sinister is that these trials
rarely produce unfavourable results, according to a 1994 study by Paula
Rochon and others. (We might mention Cynthia Crossen's Tainted Truth
again here.) Between two-thirds and three-quarters of the trials
published in the major medical journals are funded by the industry.
Peer-reviewing doesn't solve the problem, because although editors ask
authors to send them related studies, they don't know about related
unpublished studies – the largest part of the background. In any case,
there are other problems with peer review. Smith points to a study
published in a medical journal to support this contention, but as long
ago as 1992 Marcel C. LaFollette devoted an entire book, Stealing Into
Print, to the problems with peer review. Smith's solution is that
journals should critique trials, not publish them. More trials should
be publicly, instead of privately, funded. Trials should be registered,
and researchers, not funding companies, should control publication.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We always have to admire chutzpah in marketing. It's been some years
now that you could buy little memory sticks that can hang on a keyring
and plug into a computer via the omnipresent USB port. These things can
carry up to a gigabyte or two of data – say, three to six hours of
illegally downloaded TV shows – and they've become standard giveaways
at technical conferences. Part of the secret there is that a USB port
can be used to power small devices, even, given the right cable, charge
up a mobile phone. There are USB Christmas trees that light up, USB
fans, even USB coffee warmers. Now, there is USB &amp;#34;Ghost Radar&amp;#34;, which
is essentially a memory stick that beeps and lights up in weird
patterns. According to its Web page, &amp;#34;Its sensors detect and combine
any significant related changes in electro-magnetic turbulence, heat,
light, and biometrics which may accompany mysterious apparitions.&amp;#34; It
looks cute, geeky, a little like a game, and a little spooky (what with
its ultraviolet LED). The belief that it might detect ghosts or look
fashionable will cost you as much as &amp;#163;48 points (for the 128Mb version)
over an ordinary memory stick that evokes no such beliefs. On the other
hand skeptics may find Ghost Radar useful – for detecting the gullible.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;When most people think of creationism in the US they think of Kansas
(these days; they used to think of Tennessee, home of the Scopes
trial). But the school district in Dover, Pennsylvania, a town of
25,000 about 25 miles southwest of the state's Harrisburg capitol, is
currently imploding over the teaching of evolution. The acute phase of
the trouble started last October, when the local school board voted six
to three to add the following statement to the biology curriculum:
&amp;#34;Students will be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwin's Theory and of
other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent
design. Note: Origins of life will not be taught.&amp;#34; A group of parents,
backed by the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for the
Separation of Church and State, are suing to block the teaching of
Intelligent Design. Three school board members have resigned, and
candidates to replace them are being evaluated according to where they
stand on the controversy. Expect fireworks and international coverage
of what would ordinarily be the smallest and sleepiest of local
elections.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It is, of course, well known that Hollywood celebrities are experts
on every subject, especially when they have a new film to promote. Tom
Cruise, not satisfied with telling every media outlet that would listen
about his new romance with the 26-year-old leading lady of another new
release, has been displaying his Scientology beliefs in a new and
aggressive fashion. He began by criticizing actress Brooke Shields, who
recently went public with the emotional troubles she went through after
giving birth, for taking prescription medication to alleviate her
post-partum depression. He went on to rail against psychiatry – a
favorite target of Scientology – calling it a fraud. This all goes some
way to explaining why a spoof site ran a piece claiming that Cruise had
told the TV program Access Hollywood that anesthesia was &amp;#34;dangerous
pseudo-scientific drug abuse&amp;#34;. That part wasn't true – but, sadly, the
rest was.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Those who follow The Skeptic's and ASKE's Web sites may have heard
the story of how five skeptics were pulled into a laboratory on the
premise of testing a psychic. The &amp;#34;psychic&amp;#34; was comedian Marc Wootton,
and the programme was not, as we had been told, a &amp;#34;documentary
exploring spirituality in Britain&amp;#34; but a light entertainment series in
which Wootton played a rather hostile, extreme &amp;#34;psychic&amp;#34; to various
types of audiences. The series aired on the digital channel in
March/April on BBC Three, and is to be repeated on BBC2.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Want more skeptical news? Take a look at The Skeptic's blog
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/ukskeptic).&quot;&gt;www.livejournal.com/users/ukskeptic).&lt;/a&gt; You'll find links to stories as
they appear online, most of them collected by the indefatigable Sid
Rodriguez. If you're not familiar with blogs, they are a cross between
a diary and a ship's log – the word &amp;#34;blog&amp;#34; is short for &amp;#34;Weblog&amp;#34;.
Special software makes it very easy to update them by adding the latest
news to the top. Anyone can post comments to the entries that appear,
but only authorized posters can post new stories. Let us know if you're
interested in joining that group.
 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (18.3, Autumn 2005)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;How Do I Know What To Believe? (Martin Parkinson)
The Mystery of Hellfire Pass: Part One (Paul Chambers and Robert
Bartholomew)
Who The Devil Are You? (Ben Fridja)
Skrapbook (David Langford) Rescue (Scott Wood)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;The Sense of Being Stared At and Other Aspects of the Extended Mind by
Rupert Sheldrake
The Rise of the Indian Rope Trick by Peter Lamont
Stripping the Gurus: Sex, Violence, Abuse and Enlightenment by Geoffrey
D. Falk&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 The New Yorker; 2 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ghostradar.co.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.ghostradar.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;; 3,4
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4564383.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4564383.stm&lt;/a&gt;; 5 The National Center
for Science Education; 6 The New Yorker;7,8 British Psychic
Registration Board; 9 The Times; 10,11 Tiger Bone and Rhino Horn: The
Destruction of Wildlife for Chinese Medicine, by Richard Ellis; 12
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; 13 The Times; 14
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sourcewire.com/releases/rel_display.php?relid=21663&quot;&gt;http://sourcewire.com/releases/rel_display.php?relid=21663&lt;/a&gt;; 15 Ofcom;
16,17 Bad Science, The Guardian's Bad Science; 18 The Observer
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1489635,00.html&quot;&gt;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1489635,00.html&lt;/a&gt;);
19 The Times; 20,21,22 Guardian, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monbiot.com/&quot;&gt;www.monbiot.com&lt;/a&gt;; 23 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sharecast.com/&quot;&gt;www.sharecast.com&lt;/a&gt;;
24 Ananova; 25 The Australian daily newspaper, The Herald Sun
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil McKerracher
for managing the digest subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other email to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Article ideas and other editorial queries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
Email one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional
mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or
rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in return
for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year
for UK residents. For pricing and availability of back issues and
non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page of any printed issue.
The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card or by cheques in pounds
Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry, but the banking charges for
foreign cheques and postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is
no relation to the (more recent) American magazine or the (older)
Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets on the third Thursday of every month at
7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London (nearest
tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest speaker's
travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips are
provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non-skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 22nd December 2005: Louis Constandinos &amp;#34;Misuses of Science&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 19th January 2006: David Allen Green &amp;#34;Incitement to Religious
Hatred: should it be a crime?&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere. Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for
all those interested in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative
medicine, psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost
civilizations, etc. Further information and mailing list announcements
available from &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697.
Suggestions for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 18.2 (Summer 2005)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20050916120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2005-09-16:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20050916120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2005-09-16T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2005-09-16T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 18.2 (Summer 2005)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62; &amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical quotes for 2005: &amp;#34;No, I don't know that atheists should be
considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is
one nation under God.&amp;#34; -- George W. Bush.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Number of changes in the National Geographic Atlas between 2000 and
2005: 17,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Number of mobile phones left in London cabs in the last six months
of 2004: 63,135&lt;br/&gt;
3. Percentage of those mobile phones later returned to their owners: 80
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Amount the BBC spends per month on taxis: &amp;#163;1 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Number of American households bankrupted by medical problems in
2001: 700,000&lt;br/&gt;
6. Fraction that had health insurance when the illness began: About
three-quarters
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Percentage of US police car chases that end in a crash: 40
8. Percentage of those car chases that relate to misdemeanours: 90
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Date on which Pope John Paul II beatified Anne Catherine Emmerich:
October 3, 2004&lt;br/&gt;
10. Date of release of The Passion of the Christ, the Mel Gibson movie
based on Emmerich's &amp;#34;visions&amp;#34;: February 24, 2004
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Percentage of the world's food crops that are irrigated with
sewage: about 10
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Cost of attending a seminar on the risks of MMR vaccine run by the
company What Doctors Don't Tell You: &amp;#163;40
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Number of adults in Britain who are overweight or obese: 24 million
14. Number of adults in Britain who were obese in 1980: 2.5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Number of &amp;#34;alternative&amp;#34; practitioners thought to be practicing in
the UK: 40,000&lt;br/&gt;
16. Percentage of the British population thought to use &amp;#34;alternative&amp;#34;
therapies in any given year: 25
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Number of small metal egg-shaped objects Uri Geller claims was
given to him by John Lennon, who was given it by aliens: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Number of houses in the Adalusian village Belmez de la Moraleda in
which faces appear in concrete floors: 2
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Number of ghosts reported as regularly seen at Burton Constable
Hall: at least half a dozen&lt;br/&gt;
20. Number of those ghosts that is said to be that of a dog: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Percentage of American voters on Election Day 2004 who believed
that the US was safer now than before September 11, 2001: 54
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Cost of a one-hour astrology and Tarot reading in London's Cecil
Court: &amp;#163;45
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Number of pulses to be found in each wrist according to Chinese
medicine: 12&lt;br/&gt;
24. Number of different types of acupuncture needles: 9
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Number of supplements inventor and computer scientist Ray Kurzweil
takes every day in his quest for immortality: 250
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;As if he weren't busy enough trying to get his wedding off the
castle floor in early 2005, Prince Charles was involved in publishing
an alternative health guide. Well, he probably didn't do it personally.
The Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health has put out a
50-page booklet (downloadable from&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fihealth.org.uk/fs_publications.html&quot;&gt;http://www.fihealth.org.uk/fs_publications.html&lt;/a&gt;) intended to help
people find their way through the maze of treatments available, whether
those come through the NHS, private practitioners, or charities. The
government, which helped fund the booklet, has also given the
foundation &amp;#163;900,000 to help improve regulating standards. The
Foundation's six key principles sound unobjectionable if only because
they're somewhat vague: for example that healthcare should have an
evidence base, that individuals should take more responsibility for
their own health care, and to promote &amp;#34;an holistic and integrated
approach to health care which engages with all aspects of a patient's
being&amp;#34;. Most of the guide is pretty sound advice. It includes some
general information, such as a list of questions to ask a practitioner
- any practitioner - before embarking on a course of treatment. There
are loads of resources, both print and Web, for getting more
information; this seems reasonably well-balanced, and includes orthodox
medical journals and indexes as well as associations of alternative
practitioners and the like. And the guide includes a section on each of
the most common therapies people seek out - acupuncture, Reiki,
homeopathy, herbalism (both Western and Oriental), reflexology,
aromatherapy, shiatsu, massage, spiritual healing, yoga. Each of these
sections includes a brief explanation of what the therapy is, how much
it usually costs, what happens in a consultation, and the names and
contact information of any regulatory body. It also talks about the
dangers of drug interactions between substances like St. John's Wort
and antidepressants. It's respectable consumer advice, and tells you to
disclose to all practitioners the full list of everything you're
taking, whether or not it was prescribed. What the guide doesn't do is
pass judgement on the efficacy of any of these therapies. It warns you
not to mix aromatherapy and homeopathy (though how an interaction
between these two could be dangerous it doesn't specify), and also
advises that if you are seeking reflexology and have cancer you should
look for a reflexologist who is specially trained in cancer treatment.
Other than these two 'what-the-huh?' moments, the guide is sound and
unobjectionable enough. Still, we're helping to pay for it, folks, so
if you have objections, you have the right to voice them.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Findhorn has been in the news again, this time as a destination for
large companies searching for new ways to motivate their staff.
According to the Sunday Times, outfits like Shell, BP, and
PriceWaterhouseCoopers have sent staff there to commune and pick
lettuce. All part of the vogue for &amp;#34;emotional intelligence&amp;#34;, which is
becoming the buzzphrase du jour. Still, the shift to consulting for
large companies has to be a help in dealing with the Findhorn
Foundation's debt, which was as high as &amp;#163;850,000 in 2001. Not that we
should be snide about this. There's nothing wrong with spirituality in
a gardening community; doubtless the skeptics would sell consultancy if
we could think of a way to convince people they should pay consultancy
fees to listen to us whine about pseudoscience and the need for solid
evidence before accepting a claim as proven. Such as, for example, the
claim that the Findhorn founders grew fantastically huge plants, herbs,
and flowers by intuitively contacting the spirits of the plants. We
don't wonder about the results, just the method.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Interesting to discover that there's yet another ghostbusting outfit
operating in the UK: the Paranormal Research Organisation
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paranormalresearch.org.uk/&quot;&gt;www.paranormalresearch.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;). &amp;#34;The Paranormal Research Organisation
is dedicated to professional and authoritative research into ghosts and
other strange and supernatural phenomena,&amp;#34; the group's mission
statement reads. It sounds serious. Both the press coverage we've seen
and a portion of the group's Web site talk about the group's interest
in &amp;#34;orbs&amp;#34; – little blobs of light that appear on high-resolution
photographs taken by digital cameras in the process of investigating
phenomena. Strange. We thought those were UFOs.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;As Halloween grows in popularity every year, we suppose it's
inevitable that more protests about the nature of the occasion will
surface. Last year, the Yorkshire Post reported that the minister of a
Leeds church wrote to Asda to complain about the supermarket's selling
plastic crosses at its Pudsey store as part of its range of Halloween
goods. The offence: that a symbol of faith should be turned into a toy.
The store told the paper that it included the crosses in its range in
the context of the many fables linking crosses with warding off
vampires. But with cheap plastic? Maybe it's the vampires who should be
offended.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The tabloid newspapers got very excited in mid-February when single
mother Sharon Creighton told them that her &amp;#163;8.8 million Lottery win had
been predicted by a psychic. The story is less impressive than it
sounds at first: Creighton noted that the psychic had given her this
happy prediction in a letter that was probably a circular. In other
words: a bulk mailing that might have included millions of folks
predicted a big win for all of them, and was successful in one case.
What were the odds on that?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;You can see why people get frustrated with science: progress is so
slow and contradictory. Like many complementary therapies, acupuncture
has been criticized for a lack of supporting evidence. In 1989, when
the British Medical Association released a survey of the many
therapies, it concluded that in a small percentage of cases acupuncture
seemed to be effective for managing pain. A couple of recent studies
confirmed and maybe disputed this. The first was one of the bigger
scientific trials of acupuncture, conducted by a research team from the
US National Institutes of Health. It concluded that acupuncture might
be effective in helping provide pain relief and improving function for
people with osteoarthritis of the knee. The study had 570 participants
aged 50 or older who had significant knee pain but had not used
steroids or other injections and had not had surgery within the
previous six months. Participants were randomly assigned to one of
three groups: acupuncture, sham acupuncture, and control. Overall, the
study concluded, those who received acupuncture had a 40 percent
decrease in pain and a nearly 40 percent improvement in function. The
second, a smaller British trial of 124 patients between 18 and 80
published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found that both sham and
real acupuncture appeared to reduce neck pain. These trials won't, of
course, settle the matter. For one thing, in the second trial the same
practitioner inserted the needles for both the sham and real groups. Is
it the practitioner or the needle locations? Only your acupuncturist
knows for sure. Personally, we like aspirin, which seems to work no
matter what.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;India Daily reported in mid-February that the Indian Defence
Research and Development Organization has come up with a novel theory
as to why we don't see thousands of UFOs around us all the time: they
create an intense electromagnetic flux around them and we can't see
through it. The flux, the article states, can be created either by
&amp;#34;very advanced applications of super conductors&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;through spiritual
concentration by any human being.&amp;#34; So the DRDO guys are experimenting
with a device they hope can see through this obfuscation. According to
India Daily, dogs and cats can see energy levels beyond this flux, and
are probably seeing UFOs all the time; they just can't tell us about
them. Perhaps this explains that invisible mouse you thought your cat
was chasing.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;One of the first sets of documents set free because of Britain's
Freedom of Information Act, which came into effect on January 1, 2005,
is a set of letters and documents relating to the famous 1983
Rendlesham UFO incident. Many skeptics have long been satisfied with
the explanation promulgated by astronomy writer Ian Ridpath, who was
able to match up the taped descriptions of the sighting with the pulses
of light from the nearby lighthouse. These letters don't add any
startling revelations, and they're unlikely to change anyone's mind
about what happened, but it's always nice to see the original records.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Anyone who has email is familiar with the junk messages that arrive
almost daily offering &amp;#34;penis enlargement&amp;#34;. No one we know has ever
responded to one. But in fact, as the recent book Spam Kings documents,
these ads are remarkably lucrative for the spammers. Someone must
believe the claims, although presumably they are all too embarrassed to
say so. In February, Reuters reported that a New Jersey man filed a
suit when the 30-day supply of Alzare pills he paid approximately &amp;#163;32
for failed to perform as spammed. Mysteriously, the companies that sell
these products tend to vanish – shrink? – after they've been sued, as
if they had been dunked in an ice-cold lake. The US-based Center for
Science in the Public Interest has filed complaints with the Federal
Trade Commission over ads for such products, pointing out that there is
no evidence that any of the common ingredients have any enlargement
effect. It seems incredible that anyone would believe they do, but hope
apparently, as they say, springs eternal.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (18.2, Summer 2005)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Why Creation Science Must be Taught in Schools (Tom Stafford and Andrew
Brown)
An Anaesthesiologist Examines the Pam Reynolds Story; Part 2: The
Experience (Gerry Woerlee)
The Angels of Mons and Elsewhere; Part Two: Even More Tales of
Supernatural Rescue (Scott Wood)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes and the Meaning of Life by Alister McGrath;
The Whole Story: How Science Could Bring Together Conventional and
Alternative Medicine by Toby Murcott;
Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific
Discovery by John Waller;
The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life by Richard
Dawkins&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1119_041119_atlas.html&quot;&gt;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1119_041119_atlas.html&lt;/a&gt;;
2,3 Survey by Pointsec&lt;br/&gt;
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointsec.com/news/news_pressrelease.asp?PressID=2005_January_24Nop&quot;&gt;http://www.pointsec.com/news/news_pressrelease.asp?PressID=2005_January_24Nop&lt;/a&gt;);
4 Ariel (BBC in-house magazine); 5,6 Health Affairs Journal
10.1377/htlhaff.w5.63&lt;br/&gt;
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.63v1&quot;&gt;http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.63v1&lt;/a&gt;);
7,8 ABC News; 9,10 various; 11 Harper's; 12 The Times; 13,14 &amp;#34;Choosing
Health: making healthier choices easier,&amp;#34; Department of Health white
paper, November 16, 2004; 15,16 Guardian; 17 Uri Geller, writing in the
Sunday Telegraph; 18 The Times; 19,20 Hull Daily Mail R&amp;R; 21 The New
Yorker; 22 sign in Watkins window; 23,24 The Times; 25 Associated Press
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil McKerracher
for managing the digest subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other email to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows:&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Article ideas and other editorial queries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
Email one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional
mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or
rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in return
for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year
for UK residents. For pricing and availability of back issues and
non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page of any printed issue.
The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card or by cheques in pounds
Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry, but the banking charges for
foreign cheques and postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is
no relation to the (more recent) American magazine or the (older)
Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets on the third Thursday of every month at
7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London (nearest
tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest speaker's
travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips are
provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non- skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 20th October 2005: Wendy Grossman (Topic to be announced)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 17th Novenber 2005: Andrew Clifton &amp;#34;The scope of skepticism&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for all those interested in
and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative medicine, psychic
powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions, creationism, Fortean
phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost civilizations, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further information and mailing list announcements available from
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697. Suggestions for
speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;New Forum&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
An online discussion forum for skeptical chat has been created at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/forum&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/forum&lt;/a&gt;. If you have any questions or comments
about this digest, that's the ideal place to discuss them.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 18.1 (Spring 2005)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20050522120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2005-05-22:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20050522120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2005-05-22T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2005-05-22T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 18.1 (Spring 2005)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;Price Uri Geller charges for a personally signed and dedicated
32cm plate of his own design and artwork: &amp;#163;75  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of accused witches executed in 17th century Scotland: 3,500  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of new video games in which the heroes develop paranormal
powers: 2  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of years since the founding of CERN: 50  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Year by which lunar scientist Bernard Foing, of the European Space
Agency, says humans could be living on the Moon: 2024  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Speed with which the Arctic is warming compared to the rest of the
planet: 2:1  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount of prize money earned in 2004 by the male number 100
professional tennis player: $235,411
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount of prize money earned in 2004 by the female number 100
professional tennis player: $126,122  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Multiple by which native speakers of Mandarin Chinese are more
likely to have perfect pitch than native-born Americans: 9  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Price of a 20-minute nap in one of New York firm MetroNap's eight
adjustable chairs: $14  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Likelihood of a tortoise's being born with two heads: about 1 in a
million
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Frequency with which two-headed tortoises make the news: about once
a year  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cost of a four-month online course of homeopathy, supplied from
India: $120  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Weight of each Mars Exploration Rover sent up by NASA: 174kg  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of Britons thought to be following the Atkins diet: 3
million  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount the Securities and Exchange Commission has accused Lord
Conrad Black and deputy David Radler of stealing from Hollinger
International, owner of The Daily Telegraph: at least $85 million  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Minimum investment amount for an individual management account with
the Astrologers Fund: $1,000,000  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Year that &amp;#34;Pet Psychic&amp;#34; Sonya Fitzpatrick began appearing on Animal
Planet: 2002
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amazon.com ranking of Sonya Fitzpatrick's book What the Animals
Tell Me: 106,15  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Date on which an unidentified sonic boom was heard over Norfolk:
November 8, 2004  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of &amp;#34;white substances&amp;#34; the Hallelujah diet bans as harmful to
the human body: 5  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Final cost of the Athens Olympics: $11.6 billion (plus
infrastructure costs)
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cost of security at the Athens Olympics: $1.39 billion  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount of time saved on housework by those who own five or more
labor-saving appliances compared to those who don't, according to an
Australian study: zero  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of cutlery items found in a spoon bender's suitcase
challenged by security guards at Dublin Airport: hundreds (and they
still let him on the plane)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The 2004 Ig Nobel awards for &amp;#34;achievements that cannot or should not
be reproduced&amp;#34; included one sort-of-British winner: the Coca-Cola
Company of Great Britain. Coke's UK subsidiary won the Chemistry prize
for converting mains tap water into a &amp;#34;transparent form of water&amp;#34; known
as Dasani, which was later temporarily cleared from UK shelves when it
was discovered that the water was contaminated with the cancer-causing
chemical bromate. Other winners included the Vatican, which received
the Economics prize for outsourcing prayers to India, where priests
undertake work the US's declining numbers of clergy can't complete
themselves, such as remembrances of dead relatives and other
&amp;#34;intentions&amp;#34;. Daisuke Inoue of Hyogo, Japan, was awarded the Peace
prize for inventing karaoke, &amp;#34;thereby providing an entirely new way for
people to learn to tolerate each other&amp;#34;. The Health prize went to
Steven Stack and Jim Gundlach, of Wayne State University and Auburn
University respectively, for their work studying the link between
country music and suicide rates. The winners were feted with paper
airplanes and told, &amp;#34;Better luck next year.&amp;#34; The Ig Nobel awards are
presented annually by Marc Abrahams, editor of the Annals of Improbable
Research (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.improbable.com/&quot;&gt;www.improbable.com&lt;/a&gt;). The next Ig Nobel tour of the UK and
Ireland will take place March 11 to 20, 2005.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Some months back, 23 Belgian Skeptics decided to mount a mass
suicide to protest against the decision by major Belgian insurers to
cover 20 percent of the costs of homeopathy in the range of treatments
they covered. To this end - and, of course, to garner maximum publicity
- they decided to commit suicide by drinking lethal poisons: arsenic,
snake venom, belladonna (deadly nightshade), dog's milk, petrol, and
cockroach. To maximize the toxicity of these poisons, they bought 30C
homeopathic dilutions of these substances. Making a 30C dilution
involves diluting to a 1:100 solution, then shaking - &amp;#34;succussing&amp;#34; -
the dilution 30 times in succession. After Willem Betz gave a brief
lecture on the workings of homeopathy, the group drank their selected
poisons under the watchful eye of Belgium's media, whom they had
invited to witness the death agonies of the skeptics. They didn't die,
but they did get a lot of media coverage.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Sylvester Stallone's mother, Jackie, isn't one to shrink from the
limelight, and toward the end of September she announced that her
&amp;#34;psychic&amp;#34; dogs were predicting a 15 percent victory for incumbent
George W. Bush over the Democratic candidate John Kerry. A believer
might focus on the prediction that Bush would win, but back then a lot
of people were predicting victory for Bush, who was ahead in the polls
until a late surge favoring Kerry in the last week or two before the
election. We prefer to focus on the fact that Bush won by 2 percent,
not 15. The United Press newswire, which ran this story, noted that,
&amp;#34;Jackie Stallone has said her dogs channel messages from the spirit
world and send them to her telepathically.&amp;#34; We would like to predict
now that one of Ms Stallone's dogs' other predictions will be wrong:
the US will not get through a Constitutional amendment to allow
foreign-born, naturalized citizens to stand for President in time for
the Republican party ticket in 2008 to be Arnold Schwarzenegger and
John Edwards. But it could be that we're eating the wrong kind of dog
food.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Inquirer scored a coup in reviewing the Columbia
University prayer study, which claimed to have demonstrated that
infertile women who were prayed for by Christian prayer groups were
twice as likely to get pregnant as those who did not. The study,
authored by Kwang Cha, Rogerio Lobo, and Daniel Wirth, was published in
the Journal of Reproductive Medicine, and made headlines only a few
weeks after the September 11, 2001 attacks, a time when the US
particularly needed a miracle to believe in. Bruce L. Flamm, a clinical
professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California,
Irvine, reported that of the study's three authors, Cha has left
Columbia and refuses to comment; Lobo claims he did not know about the
study until six to twelve months after it was completed, and Wirth,
along with his assistant, was indicted for fraud in 2002, finally
pleading guilty in May 2004. The study itself, he notes, was marred by
a complicated and confusing design that left many possibilities for
error and possibly, given that third author's history, may never have
even taken place. Flamm reserves special bile for Columbia University
and the JRM, arguing that both are at fault for submitting and
publishing such a study. Faith healing, he writes, has no place in the
domain of science. Peer review, which is supposed to save us from such
things, failed in this case. It was not, after all, careful examination
of the study that caused its retraction, but newspaper reports of
Daniel Wirth's trial for fraud. As we keep saying, science is a
process, and on this occasion the process didn't do its job.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Halloween 2004 was a big day for the Scottish town of Prestonpans,
which took advantage of the occasion to pardon 81 local people executed
for witchcraft in the 16th and 17th centuries. Often, the evidence was
minimal: perhaps they owned a black cat, or were in the habit of
concocting homemade remedies. Alternatively, as in the Salem,
Massachusetts witchcraft trials immortalized by playright Arthur Miller
in The Crucible, there were witnesses who claimed they felt the
presence of evil spirits or heard voices. The last execution for
witchcraft in Scotland was in 1727. In 1735 the Witchcraft Act made it
a crime to pretend to be a witch, but outlawed such prosecutions. The
pardons were granted by Gordon Prestoungrange, the 14th baron, just
weeks before his feudal court was abolished. Overall, approximately
3,500 Scots, mostly women and children, as well as their cats, were
killed in Scottish witch hunts, with the area of Prestonpans being one
of the most prolific. Fifteen local descendants were invited to the
ceremony, and Witches' Remembrance Day will now become an annual
Prestonpans event every Halloween. The court also pardoned the relevant
cats.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Meanwhile, in Cobb County in the US state of Georgia, science
textbooks carry stickers warning that: &amp;#34;This textbook contains material
on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin
of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind,
studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;#34; In the (naturally)
resulting court case, Cobb County called a single witness to defend the
stickers, which were placed on the inside covers of biology textbooks
in 2002 after 2,000 parents signed a petition complaining that the
books made no mention of alternative theories of the origin of life.
George Stickle, head of science education in Cobb County, says the
stickers give teachers more freedom to answer questions, and that only
evolution is taught. However, earlier this year the Georgia Secretary
of Education proposed to replace the word &amp;#34;evolution&amp;#34; in science
teaching with the euphemism &amp;#34;changes over time&amp;#34;. A lawyer for Cobb
County schools claims that the stickers &amp;#34;improve the curriculum while
also promoting an attitude of tolerance for those that have different
religious beliefs.&amp;#34; Like those Scottish witches, perhaps.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Is a ghost good or bad for business? According to the Telegraph, it
all depends. If you're buying or selling real estate, for example,
ancient ghosts may add value to the property, especially if they're
mostly harmless, but the ghosts of more recently deceased folks are
more likely to bring the price down. The actress Joanna Lumley said she
was forced to sell a house when a ghost dressed as a workman demanded
that she leave. (The Telegraph doesn't say whether she was half asleep
when this happened.) For this reason, buyers and real estate agents are
unlikely to inform prospective buyers if a house is haunted. Now, we
know what you're going to say. You're going to say, &amp;#34;Well, of course
not, because the house isn't haunted. It's probably got a creaky
staircase, or faulty draft excluders, or weird optical effects, or
something.&amp;#34; But for agents it nonetheless came as a relief in 1999,
when a Derbyshire couple lost in court when they claimed to have
withheld the last payment on a house they had bought because, they
argued, the seller should have informed them when they agreed to buy it
that it was haunted. This could be the next lucrative property service:
scanning houses for ghosts on behalf of prospective owners. And then,
we suppose, exorcising them on behalf of prospective sellers. Meantime,
if you'd like to own a ghost, Magdalene Chapel in Arrat near Montrose
was (at the time of the Telegraph article) for sale for &amp;#163;179,000
including a ghostly horseman. A steal, really.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Japanese sociologists and psychologists claim to have come up with
the world's best chat-up line: &amp;#34;Rainen no kono hi mo issho ni
waratteiy-oh&amp;#34;, which means &amp;#34;This time next year, let's be laughing
together.&amp;#34; We welcome reports from anyone who is foolhardy enough to
try it out in an appropriately rigorous scientific manner.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;It's a rare researcher into the paranormal who is respected by both
skeptics and believers, but Robert Morris, who died in mid-August, was
that researcher. He came to the UK in 1985 from New York state's
Syracuse University to become the first holder of the Arthur Koestler
Chair in Parapsychology at the University of Edinburgh. He was
Britain's first professor of parapsychology, and leaves behind many
researchers into the paranormal who studied under him, the best known
of whom is probably Richard Wiseman. He was a kind and patient man even
to those who didn't know him well, and we extend our condolences to his
family and friends.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;If you feel bereft when you finish reading your copy of The Skeptic,
drop by our blog, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/news&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/news&lt;/a&gt;, where the
indefatigable Sid Rodrigues and a few others regularly post news and
titbits. We would be glad to hear from anyone interested in helping
keep the blog full of interesting new material.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (18.1, Spring 2005)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;The Angels of Mons and Elsewhere; Part One: The Bowmen and Other
Legends (Scott Wood)
An anaesthesiologist examines the Pam Reynolds story; Part 1:
Background considerations (Gerry Woerlee)
In Search of ET (Dene Bebbington)
Overcooked (Martin Parkinson)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Trust: From Socrates to Spin by Kieron O'Hara
Brainwashing: The science of thought control by Kathleen Taylor
Mortal Minds: A Biology of the Soul and the Dying Experience by G. M.
Woerlee
The Problem of the Soul: Two visions of mind and how to reconcile them
by Owen Flanagan&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urigeller.com&quot;&gt;http://www.urigeller.com&lt;/a&gt;; 2 CNN/Associated Press; 3
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3727768.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3727768.stm&lt;/a&gt;; 4 CERN press
information; 5 &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3161695.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3161695.stm&lt;/a&gt;; 6
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4008761.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4008761.stm&lt;/a&gt;; 7 WTA Tour; 8 ATP
Tour; 9 University of California, San Diego study; 10
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,65669,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_4&quot;&gt;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,65669,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_4&lt;/a&gt;;
11,12 expert correspondence; 13&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-homoeopathy.com/online.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.e-homoeopathy.com/online.htm&lt;/a&gt;; 14 NASA; 15
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4012659.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4012659.stm&lt;/a&gt;; 16 Reuters; 17
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afund.com&quot;&gt;http://www.afund.com&lt;/a&gt;; 18 Animal Planet; 19 Amazon.com; 20 Eastern Daily
Press; 21 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hacres.com&quot;&gt;http://www.hacres.com&lt;/a&gt; - white fat (meat), pasteurized milk,
salt, sugar, white flour; 22,23 San Francisco Chronicle; 24 The Sunday
Times; 25 Edinburgh Evening News
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil
McKerracher for managing the digest subscription list and the
Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other email to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows.&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Article ideas and other editorial queries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these
addresses.&lt;br/&gt;
Email one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably
means that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional
additional mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get
off the list, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not
sell, give away, or rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in
return for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions
cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For pricing and availability of
back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page
of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card
or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry,
but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders are
impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same
name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets on the third Thursday of every month at
7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London SE1
1NA (nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover
the guest speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free
sandwiches and chips are provided first-come, first-served, at
7.00pm. Non- skeptics welcome. Turn up at any time during the
night. Detailed directions, a list of upcoming speakers and a map
of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 16th June 2005: To be announced
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 21st July 2005: Dick Taverne &amp;#34;The March of Unreason&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 18th August 2005: Henry Marsh &amp;#34;Frontal Brain Damage and the
Human Soul&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for all those interested
in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative medicine,
psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining,
lost civilizations, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further information and mailing list announcements available from
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697. Suggestions
for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 17.4 (Winter 2004)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20050306120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2005-03-06:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20050306120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2005-03-06T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2005-03-06T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 17.4 (Winter 2004)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62; &amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Cost of completing Emma King's psychic development course:
&amp;#163;544
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Number of four-colour photographs of the President used to
illustrate the 2004 US budget: 27&lt;br/&gt;
3. Number of such photographs that appeared in previous budgets:
0
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Date on which Japan's Pana Wave Laboratory cult believed the
world would end: May 15, 2003
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Percentage of catastrophic events in Europe since 1980 that
are attributable to weather and climate extremes: 64
6. Percentage of economic loss due to catastrophic events that is
attributable to the above: 79
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Number of live posts per minute to the popular blog (i.e.
shared online journal) site LiveJournal in August 2004: 149
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Number of psychics employed by Star Temple, a UK-based psychic
phone line: 50&lt;br/&gt;
9. Number of readings they conduct per month: 6,000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10. Year of founding of the oldest known business in the world,
the family-owned Japanese construction company Kongo Gumi: 578 AD
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Cost of a three to five day &amp;#34;street retreat&amp;#34; in the UK in
which business executives pretend to be beggars to relieve their
stress: &amp;#163;150
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Number of new US state laws passed in the last eight years
restricting a woman's right to choose abortion: 335
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Amount in funding withheld in the last two years by the Bush
administration from the United Nations Population Fund: $34
million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Percentage of voting machines provided by the US'S biggest
voting technology vendor: 30&lt;br/&gt;
15. Number of states that vendor's CEO promised to &amp;#34;deliver to
Bush&amp;#34;: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Estimated percentage of British food poisoning incidents
caused by consuming bottled water: 12&lt;br/&gt;
17. Number of germs found on the average computer keyboard, per
square inch: 3,295&lt;br/&gt;
18. Number of germs found on the average toilet seat, per square
inch: 49
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Likelihood that God exists, according to calculations carried
out by Dr. Stephen Unwin, author of The Probability of God: 67
percent
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20. Percentage of men's brains that according to a Cambridge
University study followed female patterns: 17 percent
21. Percentage of women's brains that according to a Cambridge
University study followed male patterns: 14 percent
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Number of residents of the Italian village Canneto di Coronia
evacuated due to a rash of spontaneously combusting appliances:
39
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23. Percentage of 988 adults living below 110th Street in
Manhattan surveyed in October and November 2001 who had been
diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of the
9/11 attacks: 7.5&lt;br/&gt;
24. Percentage in a March 2002 survey who suffered from prolonged
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: 1.7
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Number of pages in the US Senate's ethics manual: 562
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In August, the European Environmental Agency released a
comprehensive report on Europe's changing climate, and the
picture isn't pretty. Alpine plants are being crowded out by
lower-altitude species that are creeping upwards along with the
tree line, agriculture is likely to move northwards as the south
gets drier and hotter, and we can expect to see a lot more
catastrophic weather events like flash floods, wild storms, heat
waves, droughts, and so on. The good news: fewer people are
likely to die in cold snaps. The bad news: more people are likely
to die in heat waves, and tick-borne diseases are likely to
become a much bigger problem. If we don't change our policies and
habits to adapt, we might all be doomed. Drawing on climate data
and research from centres and projects all over Europe, the
report doesn't spend much time speculating on how much of global
warming is attributed to human activity, because in the end it
doesn't really matter compared to whether warming is taking
place. By 2050, no one is likely to be arguing about that.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;One amusement in looking up global climate change as it's
likely to affect Europe, is the number of Europe-based sites on
the subject that have felt it necessary to post scientific
reviews of the recent movie The Day After Tomorrow, in which a
rapid (say, about 24 hours) shutdown of the thermohaline
circulation sends three hyper-hyper hurricanes rampaging through
the US and Europe, first massively flooding both regions and then
freezing them solid at a speed just slow enough for the movie's
heroes to run away and escape. The good news is that the cold
front stops at the Mexican border, allowing the US to set up
temporary government south of the border, from which location it
can grovel to the rest of the world about its having wilfully
ignored the warnings about global climate change. What's
surprising is that most of these scientific analyses regard the
movie as helpful in raising public awareness of the problems we
face. By contrast, William Hyde, a paleoclimatologist at the
University of North Carolina, who was forced to see the movie
when a bunch of people from an online discussion group raised the
$100 he said it would take, posted a lengthy review that made it
clear just how laughably silly not only the &amp;#34;science&amp;#34; but the
&amp;#34;plot&amp;#34; and &amp;#34;characters&amp;#34; of this movie are. We think a movie that
doesn't make scientists giggle is more likely to be helpful in
alerting the public. On the other hand, we have to admit that a
movie in which the world's climate went to hell over a period of
10,000 years or so might be a little dull to watch. But then, so
was The Day After Tomorrow. The reviews were much more fun.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Much of the summer was occupied with debates about creationism
in schools, which subject gets plenty of attention in this issue
of The Skeptic, too. The story in brief: the Department of
Education, recognizing that a number of schools - many, though
not all - in northern inner cities, were failing to give their
pupils even the most minimal education, decided to allow private
companies, organizations, and individuals to step in. For
approximately &amp;#163;2 million, you can buy yourself a state-funded
school, and this is precisely what Sir Peter Vardy, a
multimillionaire car salesman, did. Vardy, like the principal and
at least some of the staff of the first school he funded, is a
creationist. At least one journalist who has visited the school
says all the staff agree that creationism is not taught there in
science lessons. In addition, the school's league table results
are impressive. We'd still argue that if the state is funding a
school the state should be in charge of deciding what is taught
there, and &amp;#163;2 million shouldn't buy you total control, and that
the abdication of control is the real story here with creationism
being just a detail - but that's a different ball of political
wax.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Sceptics scratching their heads over finding more lucrative
careers may like to take a hint from Dr. James Houran, whose
early work included studying hauntings at Edinburgh Castle with
Richard Wiseman. Houran recently surfaced in - of all things - a
press release promoting an Internet dating site True.com
(formerly TrueBeginnings.com), which has taken to publicizing
itself via bits of media-friendly research. In one such exercise,
Dr james Houran, director of psychological studies for True,
found that many single people are depressed by St Valentine's Day
- depending on whether or not they were given gifts. In another,
he found that celebrity worship led to success in life as people
strive to emulate the celebrities they admire. Most recently, Dr
Houran has examined the psychometric tests other dating sites
claim will make sure-fire matches for their users and found them
unscientific. He believes dating sites should allow their
methodology to be peer-reviewed - like, of course, True.com. We
found True.com kind of creepy: it boasts that it screens all
members through the US's largest criminal database, checks
marital status against public records, and will actually
prosecute people who lie about their status. We feel that someone
who isn't sufficiently well versed in the online world to be able
to tell whether or not the person they're corresponding with is
telling the truth probably isn't for us. But our own chain of
trust assures us that Dr Houran is a good scientist, and that,
yes Virginia, there really are scientifically verifiable
relationship compatibility factors. What isn't clear is whether
True.com checks to make sure its members aren't ghosts.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Sometimes advertisers seem to go just a little too far in
playing with our sense of reality. We have recently noticed a new
type of ad, in which real people who are famous fictionalize
their own lives. Example: in an ad that runs frequently on
Eurosport during major tennis tournaments, a young, blonde woman
records a song in a studio, dreaming of her boyfriend, French
tennis player Arnaud Clement, and then meets him with ecstatic
hugs at the airport when he comes home. Clement is real, and so
is the girl: she's Danish singer Natasha Thomas doing her hit
&amp;#34;It's Over Now&amp;#34;. But Clement's actual girlfriend is the French
player Camille Pin. Another example: an ad currently running on
US television shows a six-year-old boy hitting tennis balls with
American player Taylor Dent. After Dent, mystified, is
unreservedly defeated, the kid's parents show up to collect him:
they are Steffi Graf and Andre Agassi. Graf and Agassi are, of
course, actually married, but their real son, jaden Gil, is still
only about two years old. A few years back, we heard about an ad
campaign that involved getting real actors to ride the tube all
day ostentatiously reading and discussing a book whose publicists
hoped would become a bestseller. We now see that the American
version of the Sci-Fi channel decided to publicize its
documentary about film director M Night Shyamalan (The Sixth
Sense, Signs), who likes to fill his movies with the paranormal,
by claiming that the director had turned against the documentary
project, which had turned into a &amp;#34;disturbing expose&amp;#34;. A month
later, Sci-Fi admitted none of that was true, and neither were
parts of the documentary. The justification: that Shyamalan's
films leave moviegoers unsure what is real and what is not, and
therefore it was appropriate to make a documentary about his life
that did the same thing. We feel that anyone who has trouble
telling that Shyamalan's movies are not real probably shouldn't
be allowed to make things called documentaries. Meantime, we can
only suggest a rule of thumb. Things in ads: not real. Things in
movies: also not real. Things in documentaries: research to make
sure. Warning! This video may contain truthful parts!
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Interested in licensing is medium Emma King, who was written
up in the Edinburgh News when she announced she intended to run
in Edinburgh a 15 week course to teach people to become psychics,
to add to similar courses she already ran in Glasgow and
Dunfermline. According to The Scotsman, King, a 50 year-old
mother of four from Glenrothes, also fishes competitively for
Scotland. The Scotsman's writer attended a class, which she
described as enjoyable, though she seemed surprised that the
other attendees were an apparently normal cross-section of the
public. Interestingly, a Google search turns up only these two
write-ups, republished in various locations. Surprisingly, for a
medium who has claimed to be so successful at her trade that she
has advised MPs and celebrities, helped in criminal
investigations, and been in business for more than 30 years, King
seems to be invisible on the Net. Even the 'Psychic and Medium
Society' of which she is president, accredits her courses, and
issues a diploma, gets only one hit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mariesimpson.com/&quot;&gt;www.mariesimpson.com&lt;/a&gt;, which
is the Web site of San Antonio, Texas-based medium Marie Simpson.
It must be that shyness effect we hear so much about.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (17.4, Winter 2004)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Psychoanalysing God: Freud on Religion (Ian Fairholm)
Motivated Distortion of Personal Memory for Trauma (Mark
Pendergrast)
How (not) to talk to aliens (Mark Newbrook)
Scepticism and the Kennedy Assassination (Jeremy Bojczuk)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Victoria Hamilton and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Defending Science - Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism
by Susan Haack;
Fundamentalist World: The New Dark Age of Dogma by Stuart Sim;
Intuition: its powers and perils by David G. Myers;
Only One Sky to Fly in: Embracing the Reptiles by Jacqueline
Maria Longstaff;
Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour
by Kevin N. Laland and Gillian R. Brown&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 Edinburgh News; 2,3 Harper's; 4 Scotland on Sunday; 5,6
European Environmental Agency; 7 LiveJournal.com; 8,9 Sunday
Herald; 10 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.familybusinessmagazine.com/oldworld.html&quot;&gt;http://www.familybusinessmagazine.com/oldworld.html&lt;/a&gt;;
11 The Independent; 12,13 syndicated columnist Molly Ivins; 14,15
e-voting expert Rebecca Mercuri; 16. Harper's; 17,18 BBC; 19
Education Guardian; 20,21 Evening Standard; 22 Scotsman; 23,24,25
The New Yorker
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil
McKerracher for managing the digest subscription list and the
Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other email to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows.&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Article ideas and other editorial queries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these
addresses.&lt;br/&gt;
Email one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably
means that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional
additional mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get
off the list, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not
sell, give away, or rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in
return for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions
cost UKP15/year for UK residents. For pricing and availability of
back issues and non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page
of any printed issue. The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card
or by cheques in pounds Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry,
but the banking charges for foreign cheques and postal orders are
impossibly high). The Skeptic is no relation to the (more recent)
American magazine or the (older) Australian magazine of the same
name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets on the third Thursday of every month at
7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London SE1
1NA (nearest tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover
the guest speaker's travelling expenses and sundries. Free
sandwiches and chips are provided first-come, first-served, at
7.00pm. Non- skeptics welcome. Turn up at any time during the
night. Detailed directions, a list of upcoming speakers and a map
of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 17th March 2005: Matt Morgan &amp;#34;Creation and the 2nd
Law--Exposing Misconceptions&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 21st April 2005: Paul Lee &amp;#34;Ghosthunters and me&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for all those interested
in and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative medicine,
psychic powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions,
creationism, Fortean phenomena, cult religions, water-divining,
lost civilizations, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further information and mailing list announcements available from
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; or Nick Pullar on 07793 158697. Suggestions
for speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 17.2-3 (Summer and Autumn 2004)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20041205120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2004-12-05:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20041205120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2004-12-05T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2004-12-05T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 17.2-3 (Summer and Autumn 2004)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62; &amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;Amount Comcast pays per year for content to carry to TV cable
subscribers: $4 billion
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount Comcast bid to acquire Disney on February 11: $66 billion  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Percentage accuracy claimed by Seattle's Relationship Research
Institute in predicting the success of marriages: 94  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of Barbie dolls sold worldwide every second: 3  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount the typical British family spends raising a child: &amp;#163;140,000
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Britain's rank in spending on children across Europe: 1  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Percentage of prints lifted at crime scenes from knife hilts, guns,
and windows panes that are palms, not fingers: at least 30
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Average number of crimes committed per year per New York burglar:
300 to 400  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Date on which a Bangladeshi tribalwoman was swallowed by a python:
21 November 2003  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of priests accused by children of sexual abuse in the US
between 1950 and 2002: 4,450  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of carats in a 'diamond star' 1,500 km across, 50
light-years from Earth in the constellation Centaurus: 10 billion
trillion trillion  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount, pro rata, JK Rowling earned last year per word of The Order
of the Phoenix: &amp;#163;388
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rowling s position in the list of the UK's top 500 earners: 5  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Monthly cost of membership in the Astronaut Autograph of the Month
Club, proceeds to benefit the Astronaut Scholarship Foundation: $49.95
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of memberships available: 350  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Percentage of the UK public who believe the UK should not implement
the Kyoto Protocol if doing so would harm Britain's economy: 57  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of women who die each week in Britain at the hands of their
spouses or partners: 2  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Year when Hubble will prematurely die, since NASA has announced it
will cease servicing missions to the telescope: 2007  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cost per minute of calls to Russell Grants Interactive Astrology
line: 60p
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cost of Grant s packages of computerised horoscopes, psychic tarot
readings, dream interpretations, and numerological analyses: &amp;#163;3.99 to
&amp;#163;29.99  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount of water available per person per year in Kuwait: 10 m^2
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount available per person per year in French Guiana: 812,121 m^2
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rank of UK out of 122 countries surveyed for water quality and
availability: 4
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rank of Belgium on same survey: 122
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount by which global water availability is expected to drop over
the next 20 years: a third  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of cattle tested for BSE in the UK in 2003: 394,685
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number that tested positive for BSE: 373  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of Britons who stay indoors on Friday the 13th to avoid
risking danger or bad luck: 1.3 million  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Drop in number of pairs of house sparrows in Britain over the last
30 years: from 12 million to fewer than 7 million  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of terrorist attacks on Israeli targets in 2003: 3,838  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of influential scientists who signed a February 2004
statement asserting that the Bush administration had systematically
distorted science fact in the service of policy goals: 60  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New character added to Morse Code in February 2004: @ (.--.-.)
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of years since last character was added: at least 50  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Annual turnover of Boiron, maker of a line of 1,500 homeopathic
remedies: $270 million  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount two New York-based companies have agreed to pay in consumer
redress for claims that their devices blocked harmful radiation from
cellphones and video display units: $85,000  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount of grant given to Lena Skarning by the Norwegian government
to fund her business. Forest Witch Magic Consulting: &amp;#163;4,500  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Distance the average American forkful of food travels to reach its
consumer: l,500 miles  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of Asians killed each year by air pollution: more than
500,000  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Percentage of American adults who believe God is female: 1  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Speed at which retired Fife headmaster Archibald Lawrie believes
the position of each sub-atomic particle is recorded in a vast
universal &amp;#34;memory system': 14,000 times the speed of light  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Date when Arnaud Mussy, leader of Nantes' New Lighthouse sect,
expected the world to end: October 2002  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Date when former Wimbledon champion Margaret Smith Court was
awarded an honorary Bachelor of Law degree by the US's Oral Roberts
University: May 2001  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of companies on New York investment house
SalomonSmithBarney's 1999-2000 list of 15 companies expected to
out-perform the market over the following 12 months that went bankrupt
amid accusations of corporate fraud by mid-2002: 2  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of chains, out of a possible 160, completed in one of
Stanley Milgram's famous &amp;#34;six degrees of separation&amp;#34; studies: 44  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Price of sending a message to the dead via the Web-site Afterlife
Telegrams via terminally ill volunteers: $5 a word (five-word minimum)
  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Number of messengers the site currently has available: 1  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount a Jesus Christian could be fined for going through with the
sect's offer to donate a kidney to a stranger, for free: &amp;#163;2,000 and
three months in prison  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Amount of time by which Irving Tobin lagged in his daily reading of
the entire New York Times in December 2003: one year, five months, and
four days  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Price of Craig Hamilton-Parker's What to do when you are Dead, a
&amp;#34;travel guide to the afterlife&amp;#34;: &amp;#163;11.99 plus P&amp;P  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Fraction of US gross domestic product that is accounted for by
consumer credit: two-thirds&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;People in this country love to recommend arnica for any injury from
a mild bruise to a broken leg. We don't just mean friends, fellow club
members, and casual acquaintances met on the street. We mean
physiotherapists and doctors, too. Yet, given that arnica is a
homeopathic formulation, the best we can say about it is that a little
massage - as, say, you might have when someone rubs cream into a part
of your body - never did anybody any harm and is known to help lots of
different types of aches and pains. When it comes to reducing bruising,
the thing arnica is supposed to be best at, you can see where massaging
the affected area might help to disperse blood lurking at the suite. As
it turns out, however, you can't even say that. In a study conducted by
researchers at the University of Exeter and the Royal Devon and Exeter
Hospital and published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
arnica turned out to have no more effect than a placebo. Three groups
of patients who were about to have surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome,
a quite painful inflammation of the wrist caused by overuse, were
given, respectively, &amp;#34;high-potency&amp;#34; (30C) arnica tablets, &amp;#34;low-potency&amp;#34;
(6C) arnica tablets, and a placebo. The patients kept pain diaries and
recorded their use of painkillers, while researchers analyzed
photographs of the patients' wrists, measured changes in swelling, and
used computer software to measure exact shades of bruising. The result:
no discernible difference among the three groups. Head researcher
Professor Edzard Ernst suggested that arnica's reputation had come
about because of &amp;#34;positive selection bias&amp;#34;. In other words, people who
recover quicker than others and say they took arnica give the stuff a
good name. Just for counterbalance: we heal quickly, and we never touch
the stuff.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Early February saw a new menace in the skies: the phenomenon of the
hyperreligious pilot. On Friday, February 6, passengers on American
Airlines flight 34 from Los Angeles to New York were alarmed when the
pilot, Roger Findiesen, asked all Christians on the flight to skip the
movie and begin an interfaith dialogue with nonbelievers in seats
nearby. After landing and hearing of complaints in the cabin. Findiesen
reportedly apologized; the airline says it is investigating the
incident. In fact, the story seems to have been that he had just been
on a mission in Costa Rica and was filled with what you might call
residual zeal. You have to admit that pilot proselytizing is
technically harmless - we are reminded of Willie Nelson's famous
aphorism that &amp;#34;Any landing you can walk away from is perfect&amp;#34; - but on
the other hand, reports say that the mood in the cabin was extremely
tense after Findiesen's exhortation, in part because a number of
passengers thought Findiesen had lost his mind and was preparing them
for death. In an exclusive interview with the American gay magazine The
Advocate - which got the interview because its editor happened to be on
board the plane - the pilot believed the mysterious disappearance of a
problem with the braking system was a sign from God that he should use
the PA system to talk about his Christian faith. Whether his comments
were against the rules depends on the exact terms of American Airlines'
rule book. But the best one can say was that it was an error of
judgement. And good judgement, unfortunately, is the thing you most
want a pilot to have. Well, that and good eyesight.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The Daily Telegraph ran an obit detailing the life of Jack Temple,
&amp;#34;homeopathic dowser healer&amp;#34;, who died at 86 in late February and
believed he could trace 120 previous lives and his origins back 97,000
years. His clients included Diana, Princess of Wales, the Duchess of
York, and Cherie Booth. According to the Telegraph, central to Temple's
theory (and practice) was dowsing (using a crystal pendulum), which he
used to detect &amp;#34;weak spots&amp;#34; in the body's electromagnetic field. He
believed that we begin with a particular energy level at birth, which
is progressively sapped by illness, stress, &amp;#34;unnatural&amp;#34; foods,
vaccinations, and even bottle feeding, which he thought disconnected
the baby from its birth sign. (Don't you love the way all these
different beliefs get jumbled up together?) Temple had on offer a vast
collection of remedies, which were to be strapped to the body along
meridian energy lines, and kept samples of clients' hair and fingernail
clippings in alcohol-filled bottles so he could diagnose them remotely.
He had expected to live to the age of 140. The most amusing story in
the obit concerns his diagnosis that Diana, Princess of Wales, suffered
from lead poisoning after seeing the way she bowed her head on TV.
After he relayed this diagnosis to the Princess via the Duchess of
York, the Princess confirmed that she had pierced her right cheek with
a pencil as a schoolgirl, and the point had broken off in her cheek. He
was able to extract the &amp;#34;poison&amp;#34; and help her hold up her head again.
Apparently he managed this without ever discovering that pencils are
made out of graphite, not lead.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;One of the great intrigues of the late 1990s and early 2000s has
been the boom and bust of the dot-com bubble. Vernon Smith, a professor
at Virginia's George Mason University, won a Nobel Prize in economics
for developing theories about these types of movement. Smith set up his
own market in a lab in which students from Purdue University and the
University of Arizona could trade a phony security with a definite fair
value, usually about $3. Despite knowing exactly what the security was
worth, his students bid the price up to create a bubble until,
eventually, enough traders began refusing to pay the premium price to
crash the market. Rerunning the experiment with the same group formed a
second, although smaller, bubble. A second rerun had the security
largely trading at its real value. Smith went on to repeat these
experiments multiple times, sometimes with graduate students and
sometimes with finance professionals. Financiers, you will be
maliciously pleased to know, created bigger bubbles than the students
did. However, when it comes to the actual stock market, Smith points
out that big drops don't happen twice in rapid sequence. Historically
since 1926, he told Forbes magazine, downturns are separated by at
least two years. He doesn't expect another bubble until memories of
this one have faded. We're tempted to say, &amp;#34;Past performance is no
indicator of future results.&amp;#34; If the pace of change is getting faster -
and the advent of electronic markets is making trading a 24-hour,
7-day-a-week hyperspeed phenomenon - those cycles, too, could shorten.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Perhaps because the Atkins diet is currently such a cult phenomenon,
the media seem to jump eagerly on any report that seems to discredit
the low-carb, high-fat guru. February saw The Wall Street Journal check
out the New York medical examiner's report and publish a claim that it
pegged Atkins's weight at his death at 258 pounds - high enough, at his
six-foot height, for his body-mass index to qualify him as obese. The
newspaper also claimed he had a history of heart attacks and heart
disease. All these claims were eagerly repeated by many other media.
Atkins's widow, however, and a doctor from the Atkins Physicians
Council objected first of all to the newspaper's having obtained the
report, which they claimed was illegally sourced and then sent to the
newspaper by doctors opposing the Atkins diet, and second of all to the
details of the report. They claimed that Atkins in fact weighed a
normal 200 pounds when he had the accident that put him in the coma
that eventually led to his death, and the 58 additional pounds were due
to fluid retention and bloating as his organs failed. He had developed
cardiomyopathy, thought to have been caused by a virus, not by diet,
about three years before his death, and did have a heart attack in
April 2002, which he speculated openly might have been related to this
known illness. This little incident does not reflect well on anyone.
While death certificates are public record, medical records are not;
Atkins's records should have been a private matter for his next-of-kin.
If Atkins were obese during his lifetime, someone would surely have
noticed. More important for our purposes, whether the Atkins diet is
healthy needs to be established by good science, not by a single
example, no matter how maliciously entertaining. It is undeniably true
that there are seriously obese people who have lost weight on it. Which
is unhealthier: the diet or the weight?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;The general panic that the triple measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)
vaccine might be a cause of autism and bowel disorders began in 1998,
when Dr Andrew Wakefield published a study in The Lancet that raised
the link. Unknown to The Lancet until a journalist made the allegation
in February 2004 was the fact that Wakefield had also accepted &amp;#163;55,000
from the Legal Aid Board to investigate whether children allegedly
damaged by the MMR vaccine could sue for compensation. In addition,
some of the children used in his research also formed part of the Legal
Aid Board study. Other than research by Wakefield and co-authors,
studies conducted since have not confirmed the link. There have been
several of these, including work by the Medical Research Council, a
14-year study of three million children in Finland, a major statistical
analysis published in the British Medical Journal, and a new study at
the Royal Free Hospital. Meantime, the rate of measles infection has
been growing among the group usually most likely to take up vaccines -
the educated middle class - as fears that the vaccine is dangerous have
taken hold. The number of cases of measles reported per year has more
than tripled since 1997; there were 360 in the first nine months of
2003.. Wakefield has, however, stuck to and repeated the claimed link
over the years. In 2001, Wakefield left the Royal Free Hospital, where
he was a reader when he published his original research but where
funding for his work had been drying up, and took up a job at the
International Child Development Resource Center in Florida as Director
of Research. He is still there, as Director of the Inflammatory Bowel
Disorder Group. The Lancet now says it would not have run Wakefield's
original study if the editors had known then about the conflict of
interest. Richard Horton, the journal's editor, told the BBC that
although he still believes there is a link between autism and bowel
disease, he no longer believes there is any link between either and
autism. It was reported last summer that some 1,500 families that claim
their children suffered health problems after taking the faccine are
planning to bring a class-action suit against GlaxoSmithKline, the
largest manufacturer of the MMR vaccine.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;If you don't like something, change the name. In late January, the
state of Georgia's school superintendent, Kathy Cox, proposed striking
the word &amp;#34;evolution&amp;#34; from the state's biology curriculum and replacing
it with the phrase &amp;#34;biological changes over time.&amp;#34; You can see her
point. Why take on angry parents if you can avoid the whole issue with
a little judicious editing? According to CNN, the state's schools would
still teach the concept of evolution, but they'd avoid the word in
order to alleviate the pressure on teachers in socially conservative
areas. After a work or two of increasing pressure on Cox from everyone
from parents to former president Jimmy Carter, Cox alleviated the
pressure on herself by recanting and saying she had misjudged the
situation.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;As a second entry in the language category, we have the County of
Los Angeles, which in November 2003 actually did request that vendors
of computer equipment avoid the common industry term &amp;#34;Master/Slave&amp;#34; in
product descriptions and labeling. If you're not familiar with this
usage, it's commonly seen in explanations of how to connect up multiple
hard drives and removable media drives (such as DVD and CD-ROM). The
master is the primary drive; the slave the secondary drives. The fact
that an explanation of these terms can be so compact makes it plain
that in fact the terminology can be changed without great difficulty.
The urban legend-busting site snopes.com went so far to check out this
tale by calling the LA County Purchasing and Contract Services
division. The story is true. And the reason is that a black employee of
the county's Probation Department filed a discrimination complaint with
the Office of Affirmative Action Compliance after spotting these labels
on a videotape machine. So they had to do it. On the one hand, it seems
a trivial matter; what matters is surely not the accurate use of
language to describe a relationship between hard drives but the laws
governing the treatment of human beings. On the other hand, given that
the labels are so easy to change, what's the diff? Except, of course,
to make the US look even more humorless and litigious to foreigners
than it already did.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Somehow we stumbled across the Web site of The Weekly
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theweekly.co.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.theweekly.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;), which seems to specialize in creative
weirdness, some of it to do with science. One of the many features on
its site is a sort of Doris Stokes emulator
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://theweekly.co.uk/4301/cooee_loves/&quot;&gt;http://theweekly.co.uk/4301/cooee_loves/&lt;/a&gt;). You think of a dead, famous
person, and the site tries to guess who you're thinking of by asking a
series of questions. It's clear from the questions themselves that
whatever success the site has at doing this is based on that old
familiar saw, population stereotypes. A lot of people must pick JFK,
for example (&amp;#34;Has your assassination implausibly been attributed to a
lone gunman?&amp;#34;), Abraham Lincoln, or Jayne Mansfield. &amp;#34;Doris&amp;#34; failed to
spot our own pick, Katharine Hepburn, which leads us to believe that
the page was created before Hepburn's death in 2003. We're not sure the
site would fool anybody with its loaded questions, but working out how
the questions branch through its knowledge base is a kind of mild geek
entertainment. At our last visit, &amp;#34;Doris&amp;#34;'s accuracy was trailing the
rest of the world by 3,713 to 4,464.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;As if there weren't enough spurious ways of reading personality in
the shapes of body parts, a number of stories have come our way about
the work of Liverpool University's John Manning, who has been measuring
fingers. According to Manning, the genes which control the development
of the fingers are the same genes which control the development of the
testes and ovaries, and the development of the ring finger in
particular is under the influence of testosterone. The consequence: men
have longer ring fingers than women do. Women, he says, tend to have
index and ring fingers that are roughly the same length. &amp;#34;Testosterone
affects the development of the right side of the brain,&amp;#34; he told
Australia's ABC television. &amp;#34;The right side of the brain is where
visual special ability is.&amp;#34; Therefore, he concluded, the longer the
ring finger, the greater the inherent sporting ability in games like
football, where you have to judge distance and the consequences of
kicking it. In other stories, such as one run by the Sunday Times,
Manning has claimed that the relative lengths of the index and ring
fingers provide clues to reading people's personalities. Risk-taking,
communications skills, verbal aptitude, assertiveness, and fertility
are, he claims, all traits that can be read this way. If that weren't
enough, he also says that men with long ring fingers have a reduced
risk of heart attack, and there are also links between finger length
and breast cancer, autism, vulnerability to depression, and dyslexia.
Finally, longer ring fingers on men's left hands tends to be correlated
with their being gay. Maninng has laid out all this in a book called
Digit Ratio, published by the Rutgers University Press as part of its
human evolution series. According to R A Lippa, author of an article
studying the relation between finger length and sexual orientation
published in the July 2003 issue of the Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, research into ring-to-index finger ratios is on the
rise. Lippa's article suggests that gay men do indeed have shorter left
ring fingers, but also notes that this pattern does not extend to
lesbian women. He also says, we think significantly, &amp;#34;There is so much
variation in 2D:4D ratios among men and among women - and among gay
men, heterosexual men, lesbian women, and heterosexual women - that
2D:4D ratios are a very poor indicator of a person's sexual
orientation. For that matter, 2D:4D ratios are also a poor indicator of
whether a person is male or female.&amp;#34; He goes on to say that the link
between prenatal hormones and sexual orientation is not proven, and the
factors leading to variations in finger length ratios are not
understood. The thing about a single measure that is supposed to
correlate to so many human traits is that the breadth and number of the
claims makes our skeptidar twitch. The claim that the exact mix of
hormones that wash over the developing fetus in its first trimester of
growth has a profound effect on its development seems utterly logical.
But the claim that this mix of hormones is reflected in ring-to-index
finger ratios and lengths seems to us unprovable until or unless you
have some way of sampling the in vitro hormone mix and correlating it
to finger length later in life; you'd also need to prove the
correlation between that in vitro mix and the various illnesses and
personality traits. In addition, many factors shape personality: nature
versus nurture is a long-running argument. We suspect that there will
be milage in the sex hormones theory, but that measuring index fingers
will go the way of measuring brains as a method of quantifying
intelligence.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Historical novels have always had to tread a fine line between
historical accuracy and telling a good story. Or, as the New York Times
pointed out recently, in the case of The Da Vinci Code, a fine line
between pseudohistorical accuracy and telling a good story. Much of
what Da Vinci Code author Dan Brown claims as &amp;#34;fact&amp;#34; is in fact lifted
from a group of other books, primarily Holy Blood, Holy Grail, by
Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln (whose own sales have
been lifted by the popularity of the Dan Brown thriller). Reviewer
Laura Miller points out that one of the keys to Brown's thriller's
success is its use of bits of &amp;#34;non-fiction&amp;#34; that gives the book what
she calls its &amp;#34;frisson of authenticity&amp;#34;. However, she says, both books
are based on the notorious hoax concerning a group called the Priory of
Sion, founded in Jerusalem in 1099. A small cache of fabricated
clippings planted by a man named Pierre Plantard in the Biblioth&amp;#232;que
Nationale was responsible for this society's later favor among
conspiracy theorists as a nine-centuries-old vehicle for world
dominance. In fact, Miller notes, the Priory of Sion was a small group
of friends founded in 1956. Several French books and a 1996 BBC
documentary debunked the hoax, but like all good conspiracy theories,
apparently it refuses to die.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;We hadn't heard of Boiron, which claims to be &amp;#34;world leader&amp;#34; in
homeopathy with a 20 percent market share, until it sent out a press
release claiming that its Oscillococcinum &amp;#34;homeopathic medicine&amp;#34;, which
sells in a box of six doses for $11.65 (it says here) had been shown in
clinical studies to decrease the duration and intensity of flu
symptoms. You are supposed, they tell us, to take it at the first sign
of flu. The press release is intended for a US audience, and so it
notes that Oscillococcinum is regulated by the FDA and that it is
&amp;#34;widely used in Europe&amp;#34;. We looked up the product in a couple of online
shops, and noted that the product information warns that because the
pills contain sugar they are not suitable for diabetics. Since the
press release also advised that Boiron is a public company listed on
the French stock exchange since 1987, it occurred to us that it was
time we knew a little more about the companies behind alternative
medicine; they are getting bigger and more influential day by day. To
be sure, they're not in a class with Big Pharma: GlaxoSmithKline has
14.8 times the revenues ($40.09 billion). Still, the company has been
growing steadily - sales up 7.9 percent in 2002 (the last year for
which its annual report is available) over 2001, with further growth in
the first half of 2003. Its biggest market is France, which accounts
for 68 percent of its sales, but it also has substantial operations in
the rest of Europe, primarily Italy and Spain. The US represents about
63 percent of the 8.5 percent of its net income that derives from North
America; the Caribbean and Canada divide the rest about equally. Its US
income grew 12.7 percent in 2002, its fastest-growing market outside of
France (where its net income grew by 22.5 percent). The Boiron family
holds 64.1 percent of the voting rights. So far, the market for
homeopathy is small - 0.3 percent of the world pharmaceutical market,
according to Boiron's 2002 annual report, with the self-medication
(non-prescription) market accounting for 13.4 percent. The company's
corporate plan is simple but alarming: &amp;#34;For each physician in the world
to integrate homeopathic medicines into daily practice.&amp;#34; To this end,
it finances the Boiron Institute, which was set up in 1985 and now
counts 150 physicians in more than 30 countries. The company spends
approximately 2 to 3 percent of its annual sales on research.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (17.2-3, Summer and Autumn 2004)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Features&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;The Truth about Rendlesham (James Easton)
Britain's Roswell? (Dr David Clarke)
The Rendlesham Incident: Some lessons for UFOlogy (Jenny Randles)
Forgive Us Our Trespasses (Peter Brookesmith)
Reflections on a Rendlesham Skywatch (Andy Marriott)  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Julia Nunn and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Why We Exist: Inferences from Science for an explanation of Human
Purpose by Eugene Bell-Gam
Hoaxes, Myths and Manias by Robert E Bartholomew and Benjamin Radford
Inamorata by Joseph Gangemi
Pseudoscience and the Paranormal by Terence Hines
Fifty Key Thinkers in Psychology by Noel Sheehy
The Scientific Study of Society by Max Steuer
How Mumbo Jumbo Took Over the World by Francis Wheen
Has Science Found God? The Latest Results in the Search for Purpose in
the Universe by Victor J Stenger
Why Smart People Can Be So Stupid by Robert J Sternberg (Editor)&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1,2 CNBC; 3 &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3484981.stm&quot;&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3484981.stm&lt;/a&gt;; 4 Mattel;
5,6 Centre for Economics and Business Research; 7,8 The New York Times;
9 Reuters; 10 the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (via CNN); 11
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (BBC); 12,13 Sunday Times;
14,15 Kennedy Space Center press release; 16 Hyperphysics, Georgia
State University; 17 BBC; 18 The New York Times; 19,20 Sky Digital,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.live-astro.com/&quot;&gt;www.live-astro.com&lt;/a&gt;; 21,22,23,24,25 The World Water Development Report,
March 2003; 26,27 DEFRA statistics; 28 Office of National Statistics
(via Harrah's Entertainment press release); 29 DEFRA statistics; 30
Israeli government statistics; 31 The New York Times; 32,33
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjonline.com/stories/021704/pag_morsecode.shtml&quot;&gt;http://www.cjonline.com/stories/021704/pag_morsecode.shtml&lt;/a&gt;; 34 Boiron
corporate documents; 35 Federal Trade Commission; 36 BBC; 37 The New
Yorker; 38 Business Week, 39 Harris Interactive; 40 Sunday Times; 41
Sunday Times; 42 Sunday Telegraph Wimbledon guide; 43 Personal
archives; 44 The Times; 45,46 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.afterlifetelegrams.com&quot;&gt;http://www.afterlifetelegrams.com&lt;/a&gt;; 47 The
Guardian Weekend; 48 The New Yorker; 49
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychics.co.uk/shopuk/book-what-to-do-when-dead-uk.html&quot;&gt;http://www.psychics.co.uk/shopuk/book-what-to-do-when-dead-uk.html&lt;/a&gt;; 50
Federal Trade Commission
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil McKerracher
for managing the digest subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other email to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows.&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Article ideas and other editorial queries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
Email one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional
mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or
rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in return
for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year
for UK residents. For pricing and availability of back issues and
non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page of any printed issue.
The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card or by cheques in pounds
Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry, but the banking charges for
foreign cheques and postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is
no relation to the (more recent) American magazine or the (older)
Australian magazine of the same name.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets on the third Thursday of every month at
7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London (nearest
tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest speaker's
travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips are
provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non- skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 16th December 2004: Geoffrey Dean, &amp;#34;Challenges in Behavioural
Research: Astrology meets Meta-Analysis&amp;#34;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thursday 20th January 2005: To be announced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for all those interested in
and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative medicine, psychic
powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions, creationism, Fortean
phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost civilizations, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Further information and mailing list announcements available from
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; or Nick Pullar at (07740) 450950. Suggestions for
speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 

  <entry>
    <title>Skeptical Digest 17.1 (Spring 2004)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/archive/digest/20040531120000/"/>
    <id>tag:skeptic.org.uk,2004-05-31:%2Fmail%2Fmail.cgi%2Farchive%2Fdigest%2F20040531120000%2F</id>
    
    <published>2004-05-31T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2004-05-31T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Digest 17.1 (Spring 2004)
&lt;hr/&gt;
--Please forward as widely as possible without spamming anyone--
&lt;hr/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;CONTENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62; &amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptical Stats&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Dubious News&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;In this
issue&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Administrivia&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Skeptics in the Pub&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1. Number of members of Cambridge's Ghost Club: 280
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. Cost of The Spirit of Diana DVD, a series of live seances conducted
by Craig and Jane Hamilton-Parker: &amp;#163;11.99
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3. Amount of air a breatharian needs a day to replace food: 1,000
pounds
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4. Cost of a 1999 mission to Mars that crashed because contractor
Lockheed Martin had made calculations using Imperial instead of metric
measurements: $125 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5. Average number of mistakes a driver makes every two miles: 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6. Percentage by which human DNA differs from that of chimpanzees and
bonobos: 1.6
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7. Year when Lord Haddington predicts crop circles will cease: 2012
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8. Year in which the Vinland map of America, forged by a Jesuit priest
70 years ago, was supposed to have been drawn: 1440
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;9. Estimated annual value of wildlife crime: more than &amp;#163;5 billion 10.
Average number of items from endangered species, both plants and
animals, seized per day: 570
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11. Number of colours needed to colour a map drawn on a torus: a
maximum of 7
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12. Estimated percentage of the population that is allergic to peanuts:
2
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13. Number of people who have died in crowd disasters since 1990: over
2000
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;14. Number of graphologists hired by the National Art Collections Fund
to examine the last letter written by Mary, Queen of Scots (the
conclusion: her mind was tortured): 1
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;15. Number of questions each month in the Australian Skeptics' online
Dr Bob's quiz: 6
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16. Estimated number of Americans who have been victims of identity
theft in the last five years: 27.5 million
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;17. Number of times a single holidaymaker claimed on insurance for
having his appendix removed: 9
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18. Number of test subjects used by Halifax Bank of Scotland for
voice-stress testing security software in a three-month trial beginning
September 2003: 300 to 400
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19. Date of World Angel Day (Los Angeles): 4 October 2003
20. Date of World Angel Day (London): 28 September 2003
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;21. Number of children an October 2003 National Public Radio survey
found had actually died of poisoned candy handed out on Halloween: 0
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;22. Year by which two physiologists writing in Nature in 1992 predicted
the gap between men's and women's running times for the marathon would
close: 1998 23. Year by which the same two physiologists predicted the
gap between men and women would close over shorter distances: early in
the 21st century
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;24. Average number of major sporting events per day, worldwide, that
sports marketing company IMG is involved in: 9
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;25. Percentage of US households that own shares in mutual funds: 50
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;DUBIOUS NEWS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Drowning in exabytes&lt;br/&gt;
It's not enough for the US to account for about a quarter of the
world's energy consumption while holding only about two percent of the
population, but it is even further ahead in the information business.
According to the 'How Much Information' report, updated for 2003 by the
School of Information Management and Systems at the University of
California at Berkeley, the US produced about 40% of the world's new
stored information in 2002, including 33% of the world's new printed
information, 30% of the worlds new films, 40% of the new information
stored on optical media, and about 50% of the information stored on
magnetic media. Note that magnetic media (like hard drives) account for
about 92 of this stored information. The study estimates that the
amount of new information stored on these four media about doubled
between 1999 and 2003. If this goes on, it won't be people the Earth
drowns in, it will be information. About 17.3 exabytes of the stuff was
transmitted electronically last year. (In case you didn't know, one
exabyte = 2^60 bytes = 221,152,921,504,606,846,976 bytes.) For the sake
of comparison, the report estimates all the words ever spoken by human
beings at 5 exabytes. The study makes no attempt to quantify the
relative value of the information stored in these different media, so
we don't get to find out how much of that is pseudoscience. They say
it's new information, but unless they've been listening to all those
phone calls, how can they possibly know? But if you believed them when
they said that computers would do away with the need for paper you'll
be happy to know that paper use as a storage medium was up by about 36%
between 1999 and 2002.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Trust no one&lt;br/&gt;
Did you know that hotel key cards contain your personal information? A
thief could take the card, run it through a reader, and steal your
credit card. Actually, that's not true. But it makes a good
Internet-borne conspiracy-type rumour. So do the claims that the CIA
killed JFK, MI5 killed the Princess of Wales, aliens are living among
us, and the US government knew about the September 11 attacks well in
advance and chose to do nothing because they wanted the oil. The truth,
as they say, is just no fun. Plus, it's still putting its boots on
while those lies skid around the globe like demented quarks. The last
of those theories - the one about the September 11 attacks ? surfaced
in the mainstream media recently, when former environment minister
Michael Meacher espoused it publicly in The Guardian. Cue for The
Times, not ordinarily known for shunning conspiracy theories that might
sell a few papers, to discuss What's Happening to Us and get in a few
digs at the competition. What's happening, essentially, is that the
more uncertain we feel the more we believe that The Powers That Be are
plotting against us. In the case of folks like Diana, JFK, and Elvis,
these figures are so much larger than life to so many people that a
significant percentage simply can't believe that they were taken out by
something as ordinary as a drunk driver, an assassin, and a heart
and/or drug problem. The real problem, of course, is that there really
are conspiracies in the world. It's not paranoia if they really are out
to get you. For debunking of conspiracy theories specifically, see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthorfiction.com/&quot;&gt;www.truthorfiction.com&lt;/a&gt;; for debunking of a broader variety of urban
legends, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/&quot;&gt;www.snopes.com&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;With her head tucked underneath her arm ...
There are good sceptical theories and bad sceptical theories, we know
this. Bad sceptical theories dismiss people's experiences; good
sceptical theories try to take account of and explain them.
Increasingly, this is an important point; we should be looking at
people's emotional reactions as interpretations that may be mistaken
but may also have real causes that, if understood, can help us
understand why so many people believe so strongly. The University of
Hertfordshire's Richard Wiseman recently did a nice study in the good
sceptical line by sending a load of people to wander around Hampton
Court Palace, the supposed home of the ghost of Catherine Howard, Henry
VIII s fifth wife, with floormaps and pencils and getting them to note
how they felt at various points along the way. The team also took
readings of lighting, temperature, smell, and magnetic fields, and
compared the sets of data. Sudden changes in lighting and air currents,
for example, increased the likelihood that someone would report a
haunting. The conclusion: that people's brains are responding to
environmental cues.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;High on Delphi&lt;br/&gt;
According to Scientific American, the Oracle of Delphi's visions have
more to do with her breathing than her intuition. The oracle chamber
was sited above intersecting fault lines in petrochemical-rich layers
through which seeped ethane and ethylene gases. She was, in short,
likely to have been in a narcotic state when she gave advice and
uttered her dire warnings. In Plutarch's description, the chamber
smelled sweet - as ethylene in fact does. Ethylene fumes also produce
trances, euphoria, out-of-body sensations, and amnesia among test
patients. It is known to have caused spasms and death - which was also
the fate of some of the oracles. It's an interesting theory - and
another of those cases where we may learn more from accepting the
descriptions observers give than by dismissing them, as well as another
of those 'trust no-one' cases.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Breast implants: the return
In late 2003, an advisory panel to the US Food and Drug Administration
voted to lift the ban on silicone implants, which was brought in a
decade earlier when a number of women and their lawyers claimed that
the implants had made the women ill. There was a lot of what you might
call consequential damage. The lawyers won a record $4.25 billion
settlement against the implant manufacturers, causing the bankruptcy of
Dow Corning. Marcia Angell, then executive editor of the New England
Journal of Medicine and now teaching at Harvard Medical School, wrote
first a scathing editorial on the FDA's decision and then a book.
Science on Trial, which contended that there was no evidence backing
the claim that the implants harmed the women. Angell was in turn raked
over the coals by everyone except the manufacturers. Studies of breast
implants, however, have shown they do not cause the damage claimed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Angell recently told the Boston Globe that she blamed the whole mess on
the adversarial nature of courtroom battles. Lawyers seeking to prove a
case look for the most extreme viewpoints they can. Science, however,
is best served by moderation and careful thought. Let us hope the
Daubert rules that require expert witnesses to cite well-accepted
research and techniques will help in future. But there are plenty of
other issues - mobile phone health scares, genetically engineered
foods, MMR vaccines ? where the science is at least somewhat at odds
with the popular reaction.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Lightning strikes twice&lt;br/&gt;
Looking likely to join the ranks of strange stories about movies - you
know, like the old saw that playing Superman is bad luck for anyone who
does it - is the new film The Passion of Christ. Two people connected
with the production, actor Jim Caviezel and assistant director Jan
Michelini, have been struck by lightning while they were on a shoot in
a remote location in Italy. OK, here's the fun part: Caviezel plays
Jesus, and they were only a few hours from Rome. Michelini in fact has
been hit twice in this production. See this movie at your peril.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;Let there be light&lt;br/&gt;
It's not often the local press run stories debunking stories of the
paranormal (or the national press either), but the Richmond Informer
recently published the news that two local residents had shown that
pictures the Informer ran in April of a purported UFO in Richmond Park
were a hoax. Two giveaways. First, the original claimants said the ball
of light they'd seen and photographed was moving, but close examination
of the pictures showed that it was in the exactly the same place in all
of them. Second, the investigators were able to create near-identical
images using Photoshop.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;IN THIS ISSUE OF THE SKEPTIC (16.4, Winter 2003)
Features:&lt;br/&gt;
Death and the Microtubules - Susan Blackmore shows that even
experienced interviewees can be hoodwinked.
The Mosaic of Memory - Chris French considers the nature of memory.
From Medicine To Miracle - Peter May questions the remarkable healing
of Dr Mary Self.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;dl&gt;
  &lt;dt&gt;Columns&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Editorial (Julia Nunn and Chris French)
Hilary Evans's Paranormal Picture Gallery
Hits and Misses
Skeptic at large... (Wendy M. Grossman)
Rhyme and Reason (Steve Donnelly)
Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini)
Sprite (Donald Rooum)
ASKE News
Letters  &lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dt&gt;Reviews&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;Galileo's Finger: The Ten Great Ideas of Science by Peter Atkins;
Immortal Remains: the evidence for life after death by Stephen E
Braude; Are Universes Thicker than Blackberries? Discourses on G&amp;#246;del,
Magic Hexagrams, Little Red Riding Hood, and other Mathematical and
Pseudoscientific Topics by Martin Gardner; Science and Pseudoscience in
Clinical Psychology by Scott O. Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Jeffrey M.
Lohr (Editors); Love and Eugenics in the Late Nineteenth Century by
Angelique Richardson&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SOURCES FOR SKEPTICAL STATS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
1 The Times Magazine; 2&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychics.co.uk/shop/spiritofdiana.html&quot;&gt;http://www.psychics.co.uk/shop/spiritofdiana.html&lt;/a&gt;; 3 Wiley Brooks,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettingit.com/article/344&quot;&gt;http://www.gettingit.com/article/344&lt;/a&gt;; 4 Business Week; 5 New Yorker; 6
Financial Times; 7 Daily Telegraph; 8 Sunday Times; 9, 10 Interpol, The
Guardian; 11, 12 Scientific American; 13 The Sunday Telegraph; 14 The
Times; 15 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptics.com.au/features/quiz/quiz.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptics.com.au/features/quiz/quiz.htm&lt;/a&gt;; 16 Federal
Trade Commission; 17 Association of British Insurers; 18 BBC; 19, 20
Diana Cooper School of Angels and Ascension; 21 National Public Radio;
22, 23 &lt;a href=&quot;http://homepage.ntlworld.com/david.winship/op2003.htm&quot;&gt;http://homepage.ntlworld.com/david.winship/op2003.htm&lt;/a&gt;; 24 IMG
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imgworld.com/&quot;&gt;www.imgworld.com&lt;/a&gt;); 25 CNBC
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ADMINISTRIVIA&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks to Rachel Carthy for administrative support and Phil McKerracher
for managing the digest subscription list and the Skeptic's Web site.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Editorial and other email to The Skeptic should be addressed as
follows.&lt;br/&gt;
Subscription inquiries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;s&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=lRHFt01kZ7YqaxCk4lg5%2de4SR1xfqrpMgBamiUDOP00%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; (please do not phone)
Letters to the editor: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;lett&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=aEHzwW8kVIEyaziHWtaTbr0%2d1B6y6R0BQkyiiFhHQQg%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Contributions for Skeptical Stats and Hits and Misses:
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;n&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=pKVijinsH2sFLnapcPVfI6_aJoawfSP1RuD584F1yv0%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Book review section: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;revi&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=_Y6SowNb45VT_Y915QOgBZWZc9irbzqOdihp8_TY6Xk%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Article ideas and other editorial queries: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;e&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=1Rks7wST0uodqnZxgG%2dC6fdwMlPx7hTLofODTRVmHBI%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;
Unsolicited commercial email is NOT welcome at any of these addresses.
Email one address ONLY. If you do not get a reply, it probably means
that our reply email bounced.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic (UK) Digest is is written by Wendy M. Grossman
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&quot;&gt;http://www.pelicancrossing.net&lt;/a&gt;) and e-mailed quarterly alongside
published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional
mailings. To sign up to receive the digest or to get off the list,
visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/digest&lt;/a&gt; (we do not sell, give away, or
rent the e-mailing list).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Skeptic is published quarterly. For details see
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;. A free sample issue is available in return
for a self-addressed stamped A4 envelope. Subscriptions cost UKP15/year
for UK residents. For pricing and availability of back issues and
non-UK pricing, see our Web page or the back page of any printed issue.
The Skeptic accepts payment by credit card or by cheques in pounds
Sterling drawn on a British bank (sorry, but the banking charges for
foreign cheques and postal orders are impossibly high). The Skeptic is
no relation to the (more recent) American magazine or the (older)
Australian magazine of the same name.&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;ENDS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;SKEPTICS IN THE PUB&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
Skeptics in the Pub meets on the third Thursday of every month at
7:30pm at the Old King's Head, 45 Borough High Street, London (nearest
tube: London Bridge). The entry fee is &amp;#163;2 to cover the guest speaker's
travelling expenses and sundries. Free sandwiches and chips are
provided first-come, first-served, at 7.00pm. Non- skeptics welcome.
Turn up at any time during the night. Detailed directions, a list of
upcoming speakers and a map of how to get to the pub can be found at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&quot;&gt;http://www.skeptic.org.uk/pub&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;
Tuesday, June 17, 2004: Norman Hansen, &amp;#34;Thinking about Creationism: A
practical application of the 'Baloney Detector&amp;#34;
The talk will be followed by informal discussion in a relaxed and
friendly pub atmosphere.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeptics in the Pub is a regular evening for all those interested in
and/or skeptical of the paranormal, alternative medicine, psychic
powers, pseudo-science, UFOs, alien abductions, creationism, Fortean
phenomena, cult religions, water-divining, lost civilizations, etc.
Further information and mailing list announcements available from
&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&quot;&gt;p&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(&amp;#39;http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?c=oCVllf_ncUNZ0YDiX_aniOnJFmYZQSaiMdvMRStCqdo%3d&amp;#38;k=01pOmZYivVpG3b4iPwfv5eqg%3d%3d&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;height=300,location=0,menubar=0,resizable=0,scrollbars=0,statusbar=0,toolbar=0,width=500&amp;#39;); return false;&quot; title=&quot;Reveal this e-mail address&quot;&gt;...&lt;/a&gt;@skeptic.org.uk&lt;/a&gt; or Nick Pullar at 07793 158 697. Suggestions for
speakers or offers to speak are gladly welcomed.
&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;END ANNOUNCEMENTS&amp;#62;&amp;#62;&amp;#62;
&lt;/p&gt;
    	     
    </content>
  </entry>

 


</feed> 

